On January 20, 2019 the World Health Organisation (WHO) named vaccine hesitancy as one of the world’s top 10 global health threats, alongside air pollution and climate change, noncommunicable diseases, global influenza pandemic, fragile and vulnerable settings, antimicrobial resistance, Ebola and other high-threat pathogens, weak primary health care, Dengue and HIV. Pointing out that “vaccine hesitancy is directly related to most of them”, and their concern not getting vaccinated is it is putting “a generation at risk” [1].

The WHO defines Vaccine hesitancy as “the reluctance or refusal to vaccinate despite the availability of vaccines – threatens to reverse progress made in tackling vaccine-preventable diseases.”

Without citations they go on to state “Vaccination is one of the most cost-effective ways of avoiding disease – it currently prevents 2-3 million deaths a year, and a further 1.5 million could be avoided if global coverage of vaccinations improved.”  By “avoid” do they mean prevent, as in you won’t develop symptoms?

The WHO SAGE Vaccine Hesitancy Working Group identified complacency, inconvenience in accessing vaccines, and lack of confidence are key reasons underlying hesitancy, which in December 2019, while cameras were rolling, the WHO representatives pointed out doctor’s are not trained in vaccinations and can’t get the information they need, yet they acknowledge “physicians’ advice has been shown to be the most important predictor of vaccine acceptance.”

But lawsuits reveal vaccines are not properly safety tested before apporval, and have complete liabilty shield, among many other issues.

The S&P 500 ESG Index(Environmental, Social and Governance) was launched January 28, 2019, just days after a WEF ESG white paper was released. [1]

The white paper was produced in collaboration with Allianz SE and Boston Consulting Group. [2]

The white paper states that the “role of the private sector in society is evolving. As the global community aims to deliver on the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals for 2030, citizens, governments and investors are looking increasingly to companies to take a leading role in addressing critical societal challenges.”  “The evidence continues to mount that integrating environmental, social and governance (ESG) considerations into investment and company management helps deliver superior performance and long-term financial returns.”

Tesla’s ESG score rated poorly where as the heavy carbon producer EXXON rates in the top 10!

On February 14, 2019, one day before the start of the Munich Security Conference (MSC) a tabletop biothreat simulation exercise took place in Munich, headed by the Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI) with private and partners from Georgetown University and the Center for Global Development.  Senior leaders from around the world took part “aimed at identifying gaps and making recommendations to improve the global system for responding to deliberate, high consequence biological events.” The event took place under the so-called “Chatham House Rule”, of secrecy. [1]

Rottmann-Großner, Germany’s Spahn’s sub-division head for “Health Security”, met key influential people from the international biosecurity scene such as BMGF Chris Elias, GAVI’s Tim Evans, Wellcome Trusts’ Jeremy Farrar and WEF’s Jeremy Jurgens just to name a few.

The tabletop exercise in Munich was apparently inspired by Bill Gates’ ‘prophecies‘ at 2017 MSC, In the 2019 final report “A Spreading Plague: Lessons and Recommendations for Responding to a Deliberate Biological Event“,  Gates’ (germ war games) speech was quoted verbatim: “We ignore the link between health security and international security at our own peril.” [1]

On March 11, 2019, the WHO launched their Global Influenza Strategy for 2019-2030 framework document “for WHO, countries and partners to approach influenza holistically through tailored national programmes – from surveillance to disease prevention and control – with the goal of strengthening seasonal prevention and control and preparedness for future pandemics.”  The goal of the strategy is to prevent seasonal influenza, control the spread of influenza from animals to humans, and prepare for the next influenza pandemic.”

” The question is not if we will have another pandemic, but when. We must be vigilant and prepared – the cost of a major influenza outbreak will far outweigh the price of prevention.” said WHO Director-General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.

Justified by the [alleged] global health “challenge” of influenza where every year they state globe has “an estimated 1 billion cases… resulting in 290 000 to 650 000 [or 500K?] influenza-related respiratory deaths”, but this figure for death is an “extrapolation” of US statistics of mostly “pneumonia” or linfluenza-like illness. [4]

The “WHO recommends annual influenza vaccination as the most effective way to prevent influenza”, however it is known that “licensed vaccines provide suboptimal protection against seasonal influenza (typically ranging from 10% to 60% [3]), need to be updated each year…”.  This global health organisation, who is funded by private interest parties, does not consider or promote the known immune-fortification benefits gained from cheap Vit D,  Vit C or the many other options already available.

This strategy builds on the Global Influenza Surveillance and Response System (GISRS) which for 65 years has monitored seasonal influenza strains – the backbone of the global alert system for influenza, as well as the Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Framework. Note: The WHO’s Global Influenza Surveillance Network “writes the annual vaccine recipe” targeting ” the 3 most virulent strains in circulation”. [6]

This new strategy framework “integrates broader goals for prevention, control and preparedness for all countries” and is “aligned with the goals of WHO’s 13th General Programme of Work for achieving universal health coverage, addressing health emergencies and promoting healthier populations.” [2]

On March 15, 2019 the US National Science Foundations (NSF) sent out a call for applications (NSF 19-050) for their new Convergence Accelerator Pilot (NSF C-Accel). The accelerator program stems from the NSF Growing Convergence Research which began March 31, 2017 as “one of 10 Big Ideas for Future NSF Investments”. [3]

The NSF Convergence Accelerator (C-Accel) seeks to encourage public-private partnerships (Cohorts). The initial set of pilot awards are focused on two of the NSF Big Ideas: Harnessing the Data Revolution (Track A) [surveillance?] and Future of Work at the Human-Technology Frontier (Track B) [trans-humanism?]. The idea is to support projects “that are identifying new ways to apply Big Data to science and engineering and create technologies that can enhance the lives of American workers.”

NSF C-Accel issued it’s first round of awards in September 2019 totaling $39 million. [  The C-Accel is “a new capability within NSF to accelerate use-inspired, convergence research in areas of national importance via partnerships between academic and non-academic stakeholders.” $27M in 2020 and $50M in 2021, $12M in 2022 [6]

By October 2022 the NSF C-Accel program awards $5 million to accelerate “Phase II development of the Analysis and Response Toolkit for Trust (ARTT) [1, 2], a suite of expert-informed resources that are intended to provide guidance and encouragement to individuals and communities as they address contentious or difficult topics online.”  Phase II is led by Hacks/Hackers , a non-profit organization focused on journalism and technology.

This $5M funds software and behavioural science to manipulate and control free thinking and create bots to counter “misinformation” online! “Users are encouraged to paste in their friends’ Twitter and Facebook posts, and the tool will tell them how “harmful” they are.” with emphasis on vaccine misinformation!  Hacks/Hackers said “Additional advising in Phase I has come from members of WHO’s Vaccine Safety Net.” [4, 5]

On April 23, 2019 the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security publishes a report titled “Vaccine Platforms: State of the Field and Looming Challenges“.  The project was sponsored by Facebook’s co-founder, Dustin Moskovitz’s “Open Philanthropy Project“, which coincidentally also sponsored the Event 201 coronavirus simulation. [1, 2, 3]

“[O]ver the past several years, [vaccine] platform technologies have been developed that could make it possible for multiple vaccines to be more rapidly produced from a single system.”  In the report “the researchers describe major scientific and policy issues related to vaccine platforms” and “it provides recommendations aimed at helping realize the potential benefits of vaccine platform technologies” such as mRNA vaccines.

To date “there has been little in-depth analysis of platform vaccine technologies as a distinct class of technologies and approaches.”   If these vaccine platform could be accepted by regulators and policy makers it would open the flood gates for investors and development, not to mention the promoted “urgent need for vaccines to combat emerging infectious disease outbreaks.”

On April 30, 2019  Columbia Journalism School hosted an “extraordinary Rockefeller Family-supported” event called Covering Climate Change, to “launch of an unprecedented, coordinated effort to change the media conversation.” [1]

CJR stated “Last fall, UN climate scientists announced that the world has 12 years to transform energy, agriculture, and other key industries if civilization is to avoid a catastrophe.”…. so the Columbia Journalism Review (CJR) a partner of Cover Climate Now (CCNow) [2] and The Nation “assembled some of the world’s top journalists, scientists, and climate experts to devise a new playbook for journalism that’s compatible with the 1.5-degree future that  scientists say must be achieved”.

Longtime researchers Dr Jacob Nordangård stated “There was a wide agreement on the urgency of pushing climate change to the fore in the media, and that the very basis for the public’s trust in journalism – aiming for neutrality and letting both sides be heard – needed to be abandoned in order to save the planet.”  “A new approach was aimed for, as the propaganda campaigns had not been successful enough.”

The CJR Cover Climate Now initiative was launched on September 16, 2019 with a week-long coverage of climate alarm.  By 2024  CCNow had aggregated “hundreds of partner news outlets from over 60 countries reaching billions of people”  With incentives and awards CCNow claims to help ” journalists produce more informative and appealing coverage of the climate crisis and its potential solutions.” [3]  The first article ‘We have a once-in-century chance’ was written by Naomi Klein of The Guardian.

The “climate crisis” is not a view held by all climate experts, which is likely why the needed to no longer let “both sides be heard”. see TIMELINE

On May 1, 2019, the leaders of Germany’s two conservative parties, the CDU and the CSU, pledged to stick together after a year of public discord, then 7 days later on May 8, 2019, at a “top-class congress”, the CDU/CSU parliamentary group met in the Bundestag with invited guests to discuss the topic “Strengthening global health – implementing the UN Sustainable Development Goal”.

In attendance was German Chancellor Angela Merkel, WHO‘s director general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, and members of the Global Health subcommittee represented by Gates Foundation, Christian Drosten, Wellcome Trust’s Jeremy Farrar and the 2017 founder of the Center for Global Health Prof. Dr. Clarissa Prazeres da Costa. [1, 2, 3, 4] [NOTES]

Germany has taken on a pioneering lead role in “developing a strategy for global health, and the World Health Organization (WHO) is working on an action plan.”

“With its G20 presidency, Germany has put global health on the international agenda.”…”I think it’s fair to say that Germany is one of WHO’s greatest supporters and best friends.”  Tedros said.  Tedros will present the Global Health The Plan to Nations General Assembly in September 2019!

At the meeting Ilona Kickbusch warned of “thinking in national units or in delimited sectors”, but rather “No one should be left behind” and that “Health ministers in the 21st century always have international responsibilities.” Today, health policy can no longer be separated from climate policy: “The health of people can no longer be understood separately from the health of the planet.”

Federal Health Minister Jens Spahn “cited vaccine fatigue in Germany with a view to the re-spread of measles. He recalled that the WHO ranks opponents of vaccination among the ten biggest risks to global health. That is why he is campaigning for compulsory vaccination…”

“Spahn is also focusing on digitization. He said smartphones and health apps can be used to reach people who have never been reachable in traditional ways for healthcare services.”

The Center for Global Health was founded in 2017 by Prof. Andrea Winkler and Prof.  Clarissa Prazeres da Costa.  Their “goal is that research results are quickly translated into meaningful and effective political measures. This is the only way we can achieve the goals for sustainable development of the United Nations, to which the Federal Republic of Germany has also committed itself.” “Due to the increasing interconnectedness of our world, health has also become an issue that needs to be viewed globally.” [4]

On May 13, 2019 at the Chicago Council on Global Affairs, [2, 3] allowed World Economic Forum’s founder, Klaus Schwab to declared the Fourth Industrial Revolution [globalisation 4.0.] had already begun.

Schwab’s message was that a “successful global future will require states, individuals, and organizations to innovate and cooperate in entirely new ways.”…”At the end what the Fourth Industrial Revolution will lead to is a fusion of our physical, our digital and our biological identities.”! [1]

The Chicago “Council leaders, especially its former president Adlai Stevenson, helped create the United Nations”

On July 5, 2019 two research scientists and and an unknown number of her students from China  were escorted out of the National Microbiology Lab in Winnipeg, Canada’s only Level-4 virology lab. [1, 2]

Dr. Xiangguo Qiu and her biologist husband, Keding Cheng, were stripped of their security clearances and escorted from the National Microbiology Lab (NML) in July 2019 and fired in January 2020 for reasons a possible patent “policy breach.”  Xiangguo Qiu is listed as an inventor on two patents filed by official agencies in China in recent years.

“Qiu is a medical doctor from Tianjin, China, who came to Canada for graduate studies in 1996. She is still affiliated with the university there and has brought in many students over the years to help with her work.”

Spurred on by the 2009 Influenza Pandemic and the Ebola and Zirka outbreaks, and with the mission of “Saving Lives. Protecting Americans,” [7] the US Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR) headed by Dr Robert Kadlec [5, 6] “developed the Crimson Contagion 2019 Excercise Series” using a “non-traditional lead federal agency”.  The “Series” took place away from the public’s eye, throughout 2019. [1, 2, 4, 5]

“Crimson Contagion was a series of four simulations that involved 19 U.S. federal agencies, including intelligence and the military, as well as 12 different states and a host of private sector companies that simulated a devastating pandemic influenza outbreak that had originated in China….[which was led by] Robert Kadlec, who is a former lobbyist for military and intelligence contractors and a Bush-era homeland security “bioterrorism” advisor.” [3]

The Series of exercises and final report:

• January 23-24, 2019 – Internal HHS Pandemic Influenza Tabletop Exercise
• April 10, 2019 – Chicago and Illinois Pandemic Influenza Tabletop Exercise
• May 14-15, 2019 – Crimson Contagion 2019 Federal Interagency Seminar
• August 13-16, 2019 – Crimson Contagion 2019 Functional Exercise – the culminating event of the Series (still top secret)
• October 2019 – HHS ASPR: Crimson Contagion 2019 Functional Exercise Draft After-Action Report – REF, PDF
• December 9, 2019 – Kadlec “Crimson Contagion” After-Action Report released – Letter  [Pg 7]

The May forum was to discuss among other things “[h]ow the federal government will organize to manage a nationwide pandemic influenza response…”, the culminating event of the Series “focused on whole-of-community response and policy issues…[including]…priortizing of vaccines and other countermeasures; available (or potentially available) funding streams or mechanisms to fund the response…”  They used the term “social distancing”.

“The public knew nothing of this exercise until March 19, 2020, when the New York Times reported on it for the first time.” and the pandemic measures implemented by Birx [military] and Fauci fit in with Crimson Contagions plan “imagined”, including social distancing, remote working and lockdowns. [2]

Jeffery Tucker reports – WATCH

A declassified US State Department intelligence report released in January 15, 2021, stated there was reason to believe that several workers at Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) displayed symptoms consistent with COVID-19 in “autumn 2019” (Sept-Nov 2019) before the first official “identified” case of the outbreak.

“This raises questions about the credibility of WIV senior researcher Shi Zhengli’s public claim that there was “zero infection” among the WIV’s staff and students of SARS-CoV-2 or SARS-related viruses.”

Questioning  whether the virus “escaped” from WIV?

In September 2019, The Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE) released a deBeaumont funded, white paper titled, “Driving Public Health in the Fast Lane: The Urgent Need for a 21st Century Data Superhighway.”,

Then justified by the pandemic, the CDC uses CARES Act funding to promote their Data Modernization Initiative (DMI),  the Public Health 21st Century Surveillance Superhighway.

On June 6, 2022 the CDC shuts down their National Vital Statistics System (NVSS) for an upgrade – which allowed the CDC to “Short and Reassign Death Records” such as for cancer, excess deaths and SADS. [1]