Pre-Pandemic Timeline
2019
Timeline of significant global and Australian data points in the months leading up to the initial cases of “Viral Pneumonia of Unknown Cause”
Navigate the timeline pages:
1800s | 1900-1999 | 2000-2015 | 2016-2018 | You Are Here | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023
Quick links to months of 2019:
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sept | Oct | Nov | Dec
Best viewed on a large screen
Data points are continuously being added so please come back again soon
Immunisation Agenda 2030 – “leave no one behind”
In 2019 the World Health Organisation (WHO) began planning a new decade of vaccines called Immunisation Agenda 2030 (IA2030), superseding the Global Vaccine Action Plan (GVAP), that started in 2011 and expired 2020.
Vaccination or Immunisation, a practice the WHO claims saves “millions of lives every year”, is a component of 14 out of 17 of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). The plan is sold as “Immunization is an investment for the future, creating a healthier, safer and more prosperous world for all” and the intention is to “leave no one behind“, the market has opened up to everyone. [1, 2]
“Immunization is playing a critical role in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Immunization reaches more people than any other health and social service, making it the foundation of primary health care systems and a key driver toward universal health coverage.” (Now think digital “vaccination certificate” – which will morph into passport)
In August 2020 at the 73rd World Health Assembly the new global vision for vaccines IA2030 was endorsed.
WHO: “Vaccine hesitancy” labelled a global health threat
On January 20, 2019 the World Health Organisation (WHO) named vaccine hesitancy as one of the world’s top 10 global health threats, alongside air pollution and climate change, noncommunicable diseases, global influenza pandemic, fragile and vulnerable settings, antimicrobial resistance, Ebola and other high-threat pathogens, weak primary health care, Dengue and HIV. Pointing out that “vaccine hesitancy is directly related to most of them”, and their concern not getting vaccinated is it is putting “a generation at risk” [1].
The WHO defines Vaccine hesitancy as “the reluctance or refusal to vaccinate despite the availability of vaccines – threatens to reverse progress made in tackling vaccine-preventable diseases.”
Without citations they go on to state “Vaccination is one of the most cost-effective ways of avoiding disease – it currently prevents 2-3 million deaths a year, and a further 1.5 million could be avoided if global coverage of vaccinations improved.” By “avoid” do they mean prevent, as in you won’t develop symptoms?
The WHO SAGE Vaccine Hesitancy Working Group identified complacency, inconvenience in accessing vaccines, and lack of confidence are key reasons underlying hesitancy, which in December 2019, while cameras were rolling, the WHO representatives pointed out doctor’s are not trained in vaccinations and can’t get the information they need, yet they acknowledge “physicians’ advice has been shown to be the most important predictor of vaccine acceptance.”
But lawsuits reveal vaccines are not properly safety tested before apporval, and have complete liabilty shield, among many other issues.
The Stock Market introduced ESG Index – to measures a companies “sustainability”
The S&P 500 ESG Index(Environmental, Social and Governance) was launched January 28, 2019, just days after a WEF ESG white paper was released. [1]
The white paper was produced in collaboration with Allianz SE and Boston Consulting Group. [2]
The white paper states that the “role of the private sector in society is evolving. As the global community aims to deliver on the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals for 2030, citizens, governments and investors are looking increasingly to companies to take a leading role in addressing critical societal challenges.” “The evidence continues to mount that integrating environmental, social and governance (ESG) considerations into investment and company management helps deliver superior performance and long-term financial returns.”
Tesla’s ESG score rated poorly where as the heavy carbon producer EXXON rates in the top 10!
Munich Tabletop Simulation with global senior leaders
On February 14, 2019, one day before the start of the Munich Security Conference (MSC) a tabletop biothreat simulation exercise took place in Munich, headed by the Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI) with private and partners from Georgetown University and the Center for Global Development. Senior leaders from around the world took part “aimed at identifying gaps and making recommendations to improve the global system for responding to deliberate, high consequence biological events.” The event took place under the so-called “Chatham House Rule”, of secrecy. [1]
Rottmann-Großner, Germany’s Spahn’s sub-division head for “Health Security”, met key influential people from the international biosecurity scene such as BMGF Chris Elias, GAVI’s Tim Evans, Wellcome Trusts’ Jeremy Farrar and WEF’s Jeremy Jurgens just to name a few.
The tabletop exercise in Munich was apparently inspired by Bill Gates’ ‘prophecies‘ at 2017 MSC, In the 2019 final report “A Spreading Plague: Lessons and Recommendations for Responding to a Deliberate Biological Event“, Gates’ (germ war games) speech was quoted verbatim: “We ignore the link between health security and international security at our own peril.” [1]
“Bat woman” gives a “TED Talk” on “Tracking the Source of SARS”
On February 22, 2019 Shi Zhengli known as “Bat Woman” gave a One Seat presentation (like a TED Talk) titled Tracking the source of SARS. [1, 2, 3]
Not even a year later, a new SARS virus “emerges” which the media pushes to be of animal origin (zoonotic), and “officials” try to discount any consideration for SARS-CoV-2 being of potential lab origin, the very lab in Wuhan, China where Shi Zhengli stores collected bat coronaviruses, and genetically manipulates them.
Paper: China bat coronavirus transmission potential urgently needs studying
On March 2, 2019, Shi Zheng-li and her Wuhan team published in the journal Virology “Bat Coronaviruses in China”, explaining that they aimed “to predict virus hot spots and their cross-species transmission potential,” describing it as a matter of “urgency to study bat coronaviruses in China to understand their potential of causing another outbreak.” [1]
WHO launch Global Influenza Strategy for 2019-2030
On March 11, 2019, the WHO launched their Global Influenza Strategy for 2019-2030 framework document “for WHO, countries and partners to approach influenza holistically through tailored national programmes – from surveillance to disease prevention and control – with the goal of strengthening seasonal prevention and control and preparedness for future pandemics.” The goal of the strategy is to prevent seasonal influenza, control the spread of influenza from animals to humans, and prepare for the next influenza pandemic.”
” The question is not if we will have another pandemic, but when. We must be vigilant and prepared – the cost of a major influenza outbreak will far outweigh the price of prevention.” said WHO Director-General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.
Justified by the [alleged] global health “challenge” of influenza where every year they state globe has “an estimated 1 billion cases… resulting in 290 000 to 650 000 [or 500K?] influenza-related respiratory deaths”, but this figure for death is an “extrapolation” of US statistics of mostly “pneumonia” or linfluenza-like illness. [4]
The “WHO recommends annual influenza vaccination as the most effective way to prevent influenza”, however it is known that “licensed vaccines provide suboptimal protection against seasonal influenza (typically ranging from 10% to 60% [3]), need to be updated each year…”. This global health organisation, who is funded by private interest parties, does not consider or promote the known immune-fortification benefits gained from cheap Vit D, Vit C or the many other options already available.
This strategy builds on the Global Influenza Surveillance and Response System (GISRS) which for 65 years has monitored seasonal influenza strains – the backbone of the global alert system for influenza, as well as the Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Framework. Note: The WHO’s Global Influenza Surveillance Network “writes the annual vaccine recipe” targeting ” the 3 most virulent strains in circulation”. [6]
This new strategy framework “integrates broader goals for prevention, control and preparedness for all countries” and is “aligned with the goals of WHO’s 13th General Programme of Work for achieving universal health coverage, addressing health emergencies and promoting healthier populations.” [2]
FDA considers mRNA products “gene therapy”
On March 13, 2019, Moderna submitted their Form 10-K Annual Report to the Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) in which they claimed on page 150 that “Currently, mRNA is considered a gene therapy product by the FDA“. [1, 2]
In that same filing they state “because no product in which mRNA is the primary active ingredient has been approved, the regulatory pathway for approval is uncertain. The number and design of the clinical and preclinical studies required for the approval of these types of medicines have not been established…”
Fast forward to early 2020 and suddenly this mRNA product is no longer a “type of medicine” or drug, but is referred to as a “vaccine”, which means they can slip into an established regulatory pathway of a “biologic“. According to the FDA vaccines are meant to “prevent infectious diseases”. The FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) regulates vaccine products – a separate department within the FDA to medicines/drugs, with their own assessment and licensing process (BLA).
Moderna goes from a company that has “incurred significant losses since our inception”, having never brought a product to market, to $12 billion in profits in 2021 on the back of an mRNA product they called a “vaccine”.
‘We probably would have had a 95% refusal rate’ for these shots two years ago, but the pandemic and marketing of the injections as ‘vaccines’ has made them popular with the public, said Stefan Oelrich, president of Bayer’s Pharmaceuticals Division, speaks at the 2021 Global Health Summit
Moderna in their June 30, 2020 Q2 Report they state (pg 70) that “mRNA is considered a gene therapy product by the FDA…” yet the FDA and CDC told the public it was an mRNA COVID-19 “vaccine,”. In addition Moderna stated “no product in which mRNA is the primary active ingredient has been approved, the regulatory pathway for approval is uncertain. The number and design of the clinical trials and
preclinical studies required for the approval of these types of medicines have not been established,…” They also state “ We have incurred significant losses since our inception and anticipate that we will continue to incur significant losses for the foreseeable future….As of June 30, 2020, we had an accumulated deficit of $1.74 billion.” [3] How convenient the global regulators allowed mRNA to enter a “vaccine” pathway under EMERGENCY USE legislations.
NSF Convergence Accelerator program begins
On March 15, 2019 the US National Science Foundations (NSF) sent out a call for applications (NSF 19-050) for their new Convergence Accelerator Pilot (NSF C-Accel). The accelerator program stems from the NSF Growing Convergence Research which began March 31, 2017 as “one of 10 Big Ideas for Future NSF Investments”. [3]
The NSF Convergence Accelerator (C-Accel) seeks to encourage public-private partnerships (Cohorts). The initial set of pilot awards are focused on two of the NSF Big Ideas: Harnessing the Data Revolution (Track A) [surveillance?] and Future of Work at the Human-Technology Frontier (Track B) [trans-humanism?]. The idea is to support projects “that are identifying new ways to apply Big Data to science and engineering and create technologies that can enhance the lives of American workers.”
NSF C-Accel issued it’s first round of awards in September 2019 totaling $39 million. [ The C-Accel is “a new capability within NSF to accelerate use-inspired, convergence research in areas of national importance via partnerships between academic and non-academic stakeholders.” $27M in 2020 and $50M in 2021, $12M in 2022 [6]
By October 2022 the NSF C-Accel program awards $5 million to accelerate “Phase II development of the Analysis and Response Toolkit for Trust (ARTT) [1, 2], a suite of expert-informed resources that are intended to provide guidance and encouragement to individuals and communities as they address contentious or difficult topics online.” Phase II is led by Hacks/Hackers , a non-profit organization focused on journalism and technology.
This $5M funds software and behavioural science to manipulate and control free thinking and create bots to counter “misinformation” online! “Users are encouraged to paste in their friends’ Twitter and Facebook posts, and the tool will tell them how “harmful” they are.” with emphasis on vaccine misinformation! Hacks/Hackers said “Additional advising in Phase I has come from members of WHO’s Vaccine Safety Net.” [4, 5]
Johns Hopkins promotes Vaccine Platform Technologies
On April 23, 2019 the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security publishes a report titled “Vaccine Platforms: State of the Field and Looming Challenges“. The project was sponsored by Facebook’s co-founder, Dustin Moskovitz’s “Open Philanthropy Project“, which coincidentally also sponsored the Event 201 coronavirus simulation. [1, 2, 3]
“[O]ver the past several years, [vaccine] platform technologies have been developed that could make it possible for multiple vaccines to be more rapidly produced from a single system.” In the report “the researchers describe major scientific and policy issues related to vaccine platforms” and “it provides recommendations aimed at helping realize the potential benefits of vaccine platform technologies” such as mRNA vaccines.
To date “there has been little in-depth analysis of platform vaccine technologies as a distinct class of technologies and approaches.” If these vaccine platform could be accepted by regulators and policy makers it would open the flood gates for investors and development, not to mention the promoted “urgent need for vaccines to combat emerging infectious disease outbreaks.”
Twelve non-state health agencies met to accelerate global health-related SDGs
On April 30, 2019, 12 non-state actors for global health and development (Gavi, GFF, Global Fund, UNAIDS, UNDP, UNFPA, UNICEF, Unitaid, UN Women, WFP, WHO and the World Bank) met to discuss “new ways of working together to accelerate progress towards the health-related Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) targets. To guide their collaboration, organizations are developing a Global Action Plan (GAP) to be presented at the UN General Assembly in September 2019.” [1, 2, 3]
Eight days later on May 8, 2019, the German led Global Health committee met to discuss “Strengthening global health – implementing the UN Sustainable Development Goal”.
Congress to Strengthen Global Health led by Germany
On May 1, 2019, the leaders of Germany’s two conservative parties, the CDU and the CSU, pledged to stick together after a year of public discord, then 7 days later on May 8, 2019, at a “top-class congress”, the CDU/CSU parliamentary group met in the Bundestag with invited guests to discuss the topic “Strengthening global health – implementing the UN Sustainable Development Goal”.
In attendance was German Chancellor Angela Merkel, WHO‘s director general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, and members of the Global Health subcommittee represented by Gates Foundation, Christian Drosten, Wellcome Trust’s Jeremy Farrar and the 2017 founder of the Center for Global Health Prof. Dr. Clarissa Prazeres da Costa. [1, 2, 3, 4] [NOTES]
Germany has taken on a pioneering lead role in “developing a strategy for global health, and the World Health Organization (WHO) is working on an action plan.”
“With its G20 presidency, Germany has put global health on the international agenda.”…”I think it’s fair to say that Germany is one of WHO’s greatest supporters and best friends.” Tedros said. Tedros will present the Global Health The Plan to Nations General Assembly in September 2019!
At the meeting Ilona Kickbusch warned of “thinking in national units or in delimited sectors”, but rather “No one should be left behind” and that “Health ministers in the 21st century always have international responsibilities.” Today, health policy can no longer be separated from climate policy: “The health of people can no longer be understood separately from the health of the planet.”
Federal Health Minister Jens Spahn “cited vaccine fatigue in Germany with a view to the re-spread of measles. He recalled that the WHO ranks opponents of vaccination among the ten biggest risks to global health. That is why he is campaigning for compulsory vaccination…”
“Spahn is also focusing on digitization. He said smartphones and health apps can be used to reach people who have never been reachable in traditional ways for healthcare services.”
The Center for Global Health was founded in 2017 by Prof. Andrea Winkler and Prof. Clarissa Prazeres da Costa. Their “goal is that research results are quickly translated into meaningful and effective political measures. This is the only way we can achieve the goals for sustainable development of the United Nations, to which the Federal Republic of Germany has also committed itself.” “Due to the increasing interconnectedness of our world, health has also become an issue that needs to be viewed globally.” [4]
The One Health Lancet Commission is formed
On May 9-10, 2019 the One Health Lancet Commission (OHLC) is formed in Oslo, ” the importance of a One Health approach, [is] simply because pandemics are more than 75% likely to stem from animal disease’. A year later they release their official report. [1, 2, 3, 4] [The other 25% lab origin???]
The commission comes just in time, as the COVID-19 pandemic propelled One Health into “importance“! [5, 6] The zoonotic origin story was pushed early by OHLC member Peter Daszak et al, claiming the lab leak hypothesis as a “consipracy theory“, which turned out to be the most plausable origin.
Australia’s OHLC representative Dr Anna Okello said in 2019 that ‘someone can hop on plane and travel across the world quicker than the incubation period of a virus. Health security is everyone’s problem.’
WEF’s Schwab declares the 4th Industrial Revolution has already begun
On May 13, 2019 at the Chicago Council on Global Affairs, [2, 3] allowed World Economic Forum’s founder, Klaus Schwab to declared the Fourth Industrial Revolution [globalisation 4.0.] had already begun.
Schwab’s message was that a “successful global future will require states, individuals, and organizations to innovate and cooperate in entirely new ways.”…”At the end what the Fourth Industrial Revolution will lead to is a fusion of our physical, our digital and our biological identities.”! [1]
The Chicago “Council leaders, especially its former president Adlai Stevenson, helped create the United Nations”
WHO partners with the Wellcome Trust
On May 15, 2019 the World Health Organisation (WHO) announced the formation of a partnership with the Wellcome Trust, a non-state actor. The partnership is focused “on three broad areas of work: health emergencies and epidemic preparedness, anti-microbial resistance and supporting the acceleration of health-related Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) through research, innovation and data.” [2]
“Epidemic preparedness is key for both organizations. As part of a joint initiative with the UK’s Department for International Development, Wellcome is one of the partners providing funding for WHO’s Research and Development (R&D) Blueprint activities.”
Endorsed at the World Health Assembly in May 2016 the R&D Blueprint “is a global strategy and preparedness plan that allows the rapid activation of research and development activities during epidemics” with the aim “to fast-track the availability of effective tests, vaccines and medicines that can be used to save lives and avert large scale crisis.” [1, 3]
China began buying up global supplies of PPE
A retrospective look found that “China had started hoarding Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) far earlier than the initial date of the [official SARS-CoV-2] outbreak”. China allegedly bought up PPE stock from US, Europe and Australia from mid 2019 (May-June). Between August and September of PPE exports from China to US fell by around 50%, and as early as May-June 2019 China’s PPE spending doubled in 2019 compared to both 2017 and 2018 together. This information which calls into question whether China was aware of a virus outbreak earlier than December 2019? [1]
Additionally in late September 2019 US hospitals reporting they were unable to get their “normal supply of masks, gloves, gowns and goggles”.
When the US Dept of Homeland Security was made aware of this statistical intel they allegedly “declined to investigate.”
The restricting of PPE exports happened around the time frame the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) removed a database of bat virus gene sequences, which has never been restored
WIV created mice with humanised lungs
A study submitted for publication in April 2020 from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) used transgenic humanised mice, engineered so their lungs express ACE2 receptors. These mice aid as animal models, representing a human subject and are used to study their susceptibility to viruses.
In a comprehensive Vanity Fair article, it was noted that working this study timeline backwards, it was estimated that sometime in the [US] summer of 2019 [winter in Australia JUNE], “months before the virus first appeared in Wuhan, the Wuhan Institute of Virology was growing human lungs, in mice, for the purpose of testing out the human infectivity of coronaviruses.” [1]
A paper by Ben Hu suggests the mice were created in 2018. [3]
The NSC officials who uncovered this important evidence in favor of the lab-leak hypothesis began reaching out to other agencies, but were immediately “dismissed” with a very “negative” response. Throughout 2020, the notion that the novel coronavirus leaked from the WIV lab was taboo, by anyone!
Further, the “NSC officials were left wondering: Had the Chinese military been running viruses through humanized mouse models, to see which might be infectious to humans?”
Did the Chinese engineer these mice, or were they given them by the US? [2]
The United Nations partners with the WEF
On June 13, 2019 the United Nations formed a partnership with the World Economic Forum (WEF) a member-only, private non-governmental organisation (NGO) and the promoter of The Fourth Industrial Revolution, The Great Reset and The Great Narrative. They signed a Strategic Partnership Framework to”jointly accelerate the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.” [3, 4]
The six areas they will focus on are “financing the 2030 Agenda, climate change, health, digital cooperation, gender equality and empowerment of women, education and skills. [1]
The WEF is a NGO, independent, unelected and unaccountable, yet has extreme global influence. The WEF are “committed to improving the state of the world, is the International Organization for Public-Private Cooperation. The Forum engages the foremost political, business and other leaders of society to shape global, regional and industry agendas.” [2]W
What this will mean >> WATCH
Fort Detrick infectious disease lab shut down by CDC
In July 2019 the US CDC sent a “cease and desist order” to the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) lab in Fort Detrick, Maryland, for failing to meet biosafety standards.
“After USAMRIID received the order from the CDC, its registration with the Federal Select Agent Program, which oversees disease-causing material use and possession, was suspended.” [1, 3]
“During an inspection in June, the C.D.C. found that the new procedures were not being followed consistently. Inspectors also found mechanical problems with the chemical-based decontamination system, as well as leaks…” The problems date back to May 2018, [2]
Fort Detrick military lab employed Bruce E. Ivins who was a leading suspect in the anthrax mailings in 2001, before his aparent suicide in 2008. The lab was previously suspended in February 2009. There have been many other pathogen containment issues at US labs.
Two research scientists with connections to China escorted from Canada’s Level-4 virology lab
On July 5, 2019 two research scientists and and an unknown number of her students from China were escorted out of the National Microbiology Lab in Winnipeg, Canada’s only Level-4 virology lab. [1, 2]
Dr. Xiangguo Qiu and her biologist husband, Keding Cheng, were stripped of their security clearances and escorted from the National Microbiology Lab (NML) in July 2019 and fired in January 2020 for reasons a possible patent “policy breach.” Xiangguo Qiu is listed as an inventor on two patents filed by official agencies in China in recent years.
“Qiu is a medical doctor from Tianjin, China, who came to Canada for graduate studies in 1996. She is still affiliated with the university there and has brought in many students over the years to help with her work.”
BBC led Trusted News Initiative (TNI) is announced
At a FCO Global Conference on Media Freedom on July 11, 2019, Tony Hall, Director-General of UK’s BBC, announced that “last month I convened, behind closed doors, a Trusted News Summit” with Big Tech giants and other media to fight disinformation and fake news. So was born the Trusted News Initiative (TNI).
Together with “[m]ajor publishers, Google, Twitter and Facebook” who have “helped devise the scheme” on the back of “criticism of big technology firms … failing to do enough to prevent the spread of “false news”” and assist with fact checking. Together they intend to control information “from scares about vaccines to stories manufactured to influence elections.” [1, 2, 3]
TNI partners include: AP, AFP; BBC, CBC/Radio-Canada, European Broadcasting Union (EBU),Facebook, Financial Times, First Draft, Google/YouTube, The Hindu, Microsoft , Reuters, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, Twitter, The Washington Post, all heavily funded or have ties with Big Pharma companies aka the vaccine manufactures. [4, 5]
From March 2020 the TNI network of media and Big Tech giants, coordinated the censorship and “fact checking” of any expert voice that didn’t ask “approved” questions or come to “approved” conclusions, or promotes anything that jeopardised the vaccine agenda.
The Narrative >>>
The Mockingbird Media >>>
BBC exposed >>
Mysterious outbreak of vaping-related lung injury illness in US
On August 1, 2019 the CDC launched a multistate investigation into a mysterious outbreak of lung injury illnesses later refered to as EVALI. At this time 25 US states had reported possible cases of lung illnesses associated with use of e-cigarette (vaping) products (e.g., devices, liquids, refill pods, and cartridges), of which 2 deaths had been reported. [2, 3]
As early as July 2019 several patients aged 18–35 years with acute lung injury, reported to all have “experienced several days of worsening dyspnea, nausea, vomiting, abdominal discomfort and fever”. “All five patients shared a history of recent use of marijuana oils or concentrates in e-cigarettes”.
On Feb 25, 2020 the CDC reported Emergency department (ED) visits related to vaping products continue to decline, after sharply increasing in August 2019 and peaking in September 2019. [4] As of February 18, 2020, a total of 2,807 hospitalized EVALI cases were reported to CDC from all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and two U.S. territories (Puerto Rico and U.S. Virgin Islands) of which 68 died. The first death was reported on Aug 23, 2019.
“No evidence of infectious diseases has been identified in these patients, therefore lung illnesses are likely associated with a chemical exposure.” Investigations by the CDC into EVALI revealed 82% of hospitalized patients reported tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)-containing product use, potentially contaminated. [5]
Kary Mullis, the inventor of PCR, passes away
Kary Banks Mullis, who received the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1993 for his invention of PCR, died on August 7, 2019 of pneumonia at the age of 74. [1, 2, 3]
Kary was clear that PCR tests are not a diagnostic tool, they can’t tell you that you’re sick. [5]
“PCR is just a process that is used to make a whole lot of something out of something” because there’s “very few molecules that you don’t have at least one single one of in your body.”
The intended use of the PCR was, and still is, to apply it as a manufacturing technique, being able to replicate DNA sequences millions and billions of times, and not as a diagnostic tool to detect viruses.[4]
Mullis once stated that Dr Anthony Fauci “doesn’t know anything about anything” and because of this “he should not be in the position he’s in”.
More on PCR >>
Remdesivir dropped from Ebola trial in DRC – increased risk of death & kidney failure
On August 9, 2019 the independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) recommended the early termination of an Ebola Therapeutics Trial in Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) because an early stopping criterion in the protocol had been met by one of the products, REGN-EB3, a monoclonal antibody. They recommended that all future patients be randomized to receive either REGN-EB3 or mAb114 in what is being considered an extension phase of the study. [1, 2]
“The four therapies are administered as intravenous infusions. REGN-EB3 and mAb114 are administered as single infusions and ZMapp and remdesivir are administered as infusions over multiple days.”
“The study was designed to compare mortality among patients who received one of three investigational Ebola drugs with that from a control group of patients who received the investigational monoclonal antibody cocktail ZMapp”…”The mortality rate in the remdesivir treatment group, 53% (93/175), was similar to ZMapp.” Remdesivir increased the risk of deaths and caused renal failure.
Three drugs were supported by US NIH/NIAID and BARDA, and one of the products dropped from the trial, remdesivir is made by Gilead Sciences.
The Pamoja Tulinde Maisha (PALM [together save lives]) study is a randomized, controlled trial of four investigational agents (ZMapp, remdesivir, mAb114 and REGN-EB3) for the treatment of patients with Ebola virus disease. The study began on November 20, 2018 in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) as part of the emergency response to an ongoing Ebola outbreak in the North Kivu and Ituri Provinces.
The Ebola trial paper was published December 12, 2019 in the New England Journal of Medicine, just 19 days before Gilead posted clinical trial (NCT04292899) for a Phase 3 trial to “[e]valuate the Safety and Antiviral Activity of Remdesivir (GS-5734™)” for use in COVID-19 patients with severe disease! [3, 4, 5]
US HHS ASPR developed and ran the Crimson Contagion 2019 Exercise Series
Spurred on by the 2009 Influenza Pandemic and the Ebola and Zirka outbreaks, and with the mission of “Saving Lives. Protecting Americans,” [7] the US Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR) headed by Dr Robert Kadlec [5, 6] “developed the Crimson Contagion 2019 Excercise Series” using a “non-traditional lead federal agency”. The “Series” took place away from the public’s eye, throughout 2019. [1, 2, 4, 5]
“Crimson Contagion was a series of four simulations that involved 19 U.S. federal agencies, including intelligence and the military, as well as 12 different states and a host of private sector companies that simulated a devastating pandemic influenza outbreak that had originated in China….[which was led by] Robert Kadlec, who is a former lobbyist for military and intelligence contractors and a Bush-era homeland security “bioterrorism” advisor.” [3]
The Series of exercises and final report:
- January 23-24, 2019 – Internal HHS Pandemic Influenza Tabletop Exercise
- April 10, 2019 – Chicago and Illinois Pandemic Influenza Tabletop Exercise
- May 14-15, 2019 – Crimson Contagion 2019 Federal Interagency Seminar
- August 13-16, 2019 – Crimson Contagion 2019 Functional Exercise – the culminating event of the Series (still top secret)
- October 2019 – HHS ASPR: Crimson Contagion 2019 Functional Exercise Draft After-Action Report – REF, PDF
- December 9, 2019 – Kadlec “Crimson Contagion” After-Action Report released – Letter [Pg 7]
The May forum was to discuss among other things “[h]ow the federal government will organize to manage a nationwide pandemic influenza response…”, the culminating event of the Series “focused on whole-of-community response and policy issues…[including]…priortizing of vaccines and other countermeasures; available (or potentially available) funding streams or mechanisms to fund the response…” They used the term “social distancing”.
“The public knew nothing of this exercise until March 19, 2020, when the New York Times reported on it for the first time.” and the pandemic measures implemented by Birx [military] and Fauci fit in with Crimson Contagions plan “imagined”, including social distancing, remote working and lockdowns. [2]
Jeffery Tucker reports – WATCH
Declassified: Breach of lab containment WIV
A declassified US State Department intelligence report released in January 15, 2021, stated there was reason to believe that several workers at Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) displayed symptoms consistent with COVID-19 in “autumn 2019” (Sept-Nov 2019) before the first official “identified” case of the outbreak.
“This raises questions about the credibility of WIV senior researcher Shi Zhengli’s public claim that there was “zero infection” among the WIV’s staff and students of SARS-CoV-2 or SARS-related viruses.”
Questioning whether the virus “escaped” from WIV?
Retrospective: China paper suggest virus origin September 2019 in US!
According to a September 23, 2021 article out of China, they report that “Chinese researchers have discovered by employing big-data analysis that the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States might have started to spread around in September 2019” [1]
“According to… a preprint in ChinaXiv, a series of previous studies showed that the United States, Spain, France, Italy, Brazil and other countries had shown signs of being hit by the virus before its outbreak in China” [2]
“The result indicated that, for the 12 U.S. states, the possible dates of the first infection, with a probability of 50 percent, fall mostly between August and October 2019, while the earliest is April 26, 2019 on Rhode Island, and the latest is Nov. 30, 2019 in Delaware.”
Other novel approaches suggested the virus started in China earlier than officially declared, as early as October-November 2021.
CDC’s Data Modernization Initiative starts with a white paper
In September 2019, The Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE) released a deBeaumont funded, white paper titled, “Driving Public Health in the Fast Lane: The Urgent Need for a 21st Century Data Superhighway.”,
Then justified by the pandemic, the CDC uses CARES Act funding to promote their Data Modernization Initiative (DMI), the Public Health 21st Century Surveillance Superhighway.
On June 6, 2022 the CDC shuts down their National Vital Statistics System (NVSS) for an upgrade – which allowed the CDC to “Short and Reassign Death Records” such as for cancer, excess deaths and SADS. [1]
SARS-CoV-2 was circulating in Italy – blood work antibodies indicate
Between September 3, 2019 to March 2020, blood was taken from healthy trial volunteers from across several Italian regions who were enrolled in a lung cancer screening trial. Upon later analysis it was found the blood from many participants had the “unexpected detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies”, strongly suggesting the virus was in circulation in Italy as early as September 2019, approximately 5 months before the first official reported case of COVID-19 in February 2020.
The National Cancer Institute (INT) of the Italian city of Milan published their data in Tumori Journal and it is reported to show that 11.6% of 959 healthy volunteers enrolled in a lung cancer screening trial had developed SARS-CoV-2 antibodies well before February 21, 2020 when their first official COVID-19 patient was recorded.
Italian researchers told Reuters in March 2020 that they reported a higher than usual number of cases of severe pneumonia and flu in Lombardy in the last quarter of 2019 [1]
Italy had a bad 2019 flu season (late 2019), and so did the US. [1]
Tests of the US blood supply indicates the SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were present in December 2019.
“The vaccine will be the real killer” states an anonymous “Operative”
Curiously on September 4, 2019 (US time) an anonymous person claiming to be an “Operative” who displays a Swedish flag, posted on 4Chan warning of a “major event” coming in 2020-2021 that will kill “9-10 million Americans“. They stated “Do not accept any vaccines that will be released for a deadly virus in the winter of 2020” [Dec-Feb?]. They stated the virus would first appear in “TORILLE! :)” which in Finnish translates to “square” or maybe market square or “wet market“?
A few minutes later they stated“It will originate from a pharmaceutical company working with military op’s in a west coast state. It will be accurately planted in major cities and It will cause flue like symptoms and may be deadly to elders and babies but the media will report it as deadly for everyone but It’s a hoax, the vaccine will be the real killer packed with copious amounts of toxic metals.”…then “…I know they have tested It multiple times already but in different “brand” names”.
Not all accurate, but the timing is interesting, as one person points out “That’s the plot to at least a dozen Hollywood movies.”Make of this as you will! – CREDIT
Timeline pages:
1800s | 1900-1945 | 1946-1979 | 1980-1999 | 2000-2015 | 2016-2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023