Pre-Pandemic Timeline
1980 to 1999
Chronological order of significant global data points in the years leading up to the COVID-19 Pandemic
Navigate the timeline pages:
1800s | 1900-1945 | 1946-1997 | You Are Here | 2000-2015 | 2016-2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023
Best viewed on a large screen
Data points are continuously being added so please come back again soon.
US Supreme Court rule GMO bacteria can be patented
On June 16, 1980 the US Supreme Court in Diamond v Chakrabarty (a landmark case) determined genetically modified bacteria could be patented because such an invention constituted a “manufacture” or “composition of matter”, and though “micro-organisms are alive is withoug legal significance for the purpose of the patent law” [1, 2]
General Electric filed a US patent application for a genetically modified bacterium capable of breaking down crude oil (Pseudomonas putida), listing Ananda Mohan Chakrabarty as the inventor, but the application was rejected by a patent examiner, because under patent law at that time, living things were generally understood to not be patentable subject matter.
US passes Bayh-Dole Act: Government funded scientists can now own patent rights
On December 12, 1980 the Patent and Trademark Law Amendments Act otherwise known as the Bayh–Dole Act passed into law in the United States. It is legislation dealing with intellectual property arising from federal government-funded research. Bayh-Dole permits universities to lay claim to all new ideas made in labs and research centers backed by federal funding—taxpayers’ money, instead of allegedly laying dormant when patents are assigned to the federal government. [1] In short Federal officials can profit from patents in the specialties for which they are hired using tax-payer funds. [6]
“The idea was simple and straightforward. Create a single set of rules for all federal funding agencies to grant ownership of inventions to the universities and researchers that created them. With schools and researchers given the freedom to negotiate their license terms, more ideas would start to migrate from the lab to the market and in turn, provide economic growth.”
“Consider the fact that each year, NIH doles out $32 billion in grants to approximately 56,000 grantees”. The NIH and it’s department directors control who receives that funding – they control/direct where “innovation” can occur!
Scientists could then license-out their patents to private companies, such as pharmaceutical companies if it was a drug/vaccine patent, and then personally receive royalties, all from their research which was funded by US taxpayers money – the intent to spur innovation! The pharma company would then sell the “drug” back to the American people, the initial funders, at a premium. [5] An example being Dr Fauci receiving royalties on his patent ownership of AIDS medications! [3, 2]
But what about the inherent conflict of interest? Especially if they’re the vary public health officials pushing vaccine mandates! [4]
US: The first Genetically Modified (GM) drug is approved, in record time
On October 28, 1982 biosynthetic human insulin (BHI) called Humulin, received FDA marketing approval for human use, and marked the first drug product developed through recombinant DNA techniques, a genetically modified (GM) drug. It represented a “technological advance through the demonstration of scientific and commercial viability of recombinant DNA technology”
Dr. Henry Miller, the medical officer in charge of the FDA approval said it approval stated it “launched a revolutionary new era in pharmaceutical development…both the drugmakers and regulators were exploring unknown territory…” [3, 4]
Approval was awarded in only 5 months, and that was allegedly delayed, Miller was ready to approve after 4 months. The NY Times reported such apporval would normally take 20 to 30 months. [2]
It is called human insulin because it is claimed to be an “exact copy of the insulin molecule produced by the body and therefore it would produce less antibodies.” The synthetic insulin is said to cause the patient to be unaware they are hypoglycaemiac and may be connected to ‘dead in bed syndrome‘, wher patients die suddenly in their sleep! [1]
Following the isolation of a ringlet of DNA called a “plasmid” from a bacterium in 1973, which sparked the GM revolution, Eli Lilly and Co. obtained from startup Genentech, Inc., the licence for the recombinant Escherichia coli bacteria that contained the insulin genes, they developed the processes for the large-scale cultivation of the bacteria…and for the purification and formulation of the insulin. Lilly began the clinical trials in July 1980 with “400 patients in 12 medical centers in the United States” were tested some insulin-naive (101) others changed from animal insulin (112) and followed for 6 and 3 month respectively. The submission was made to the FDA in May 1982, and approval received just 5 months later.[2, 5]
Prior to this GM insulin, people with diabetes used animal pancreas derived insulin, originally beef insulin. In the 1970s highly purified pork insulin became available. These non-synthesised animal insulins didn’t have a patent. It was claimed animal insulins would run out and so GM versions would be needed and would be cheaper. The 2 manufactures (Novo Nordisk & Eli Lilly) of animal insulin systematically withdrew them from the market, even as concerning side effects were reported from use of the GM version.
Britain approved it one month earlier (according to NY Times), similar to COVID-19 vaccine approval a few weeks apart for UK versus USA in December 2020.
UN GA agrees to establish the “Brundtland Commission”- basis for future Earth Summit
At the 38th session of the UN General Assembly held December 19, 1983, they approved [38/161] a May 23, 1983 decision adopted by the 11th Governing Council of the United Nations Environment Programme‘s (UNEP), thei resolution titled “Process of preparation of the Environmental Perspective to the Year 2000 and Beyond” [6]. UNEP recommended the UN establishment of a “Special Commission” to “make available a report on environment and the global problamatique to the year 2000 and beyond, including proposed strategies for sustainable development” The report was to be completed “within a period of two years from its establishment.” [1, 2, 3]
The UN Secretary-General Javier Pérez de Cuéllar, appointed Gro Harlem Brundtland as Chair, The Special Commission (Intergovernmental Inter-sessional Preparatory Committee), which had adopted the name the World Commission on Environment and Development in 1984 (commonly known as the Brundtland Commission), began its work in May 1984. Over the next three years it held public hearings and studied the issues. [4, 5] and in 1987 the commission published their report titled Our Common Future, where they cemented the term “sustainable development”. This document formed the basis for the 1992 first UN Earth Summit (UNCED).
The Task Force for Child Survival and Development is formed – plan to vaccinate the world’s children
In March of 1984, at conference sponsored by The Rockefeller Foundation and held at the Bellagio Conference Center in Bellagio, Italy, where 34 world health leaders met The Task Force for Child Survival and Development (TFCSD) was formed, founded by Dr. Bill Foege. [1].
They agreed:
To a plan not only to immunize all the world’s children as an impetus to primary health care, but also to promote other effective means–ranging from oral rehydration to child spacing and family planning–where and when opportunities present themselves, so as to reduce morbidity and mortality in this most vulnerable of all groups.
In ~November 2004, with funding from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, CDC and Rockefeller Foundation the Task Force began research on coalitions and collaborations in Global Health. [8] Following the publication of the book, Real Collaboration: What it Takes for Global Health to Succeed, authored by Task Force President and CEO Mark Rosenberg et al [3, 7] the organisation had morphed, to now target every person on the planet and became The Task Force for Global Health, a nonprofit, public health organization, recognized as a 501(c)(3) corporation, based in Atlanta, Georgia, USA, plus a non-profit subsidiary called Global Health Solutions (GHS). [4, 5, 6]
In 1991 the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) through grant money set up the All Kids Count program to “develop immunization registries, then the Task Forced got involved with the program to forge “new alliances between the public and private health care sectors.” [8, 9] In 2002 it morphed into the Public Health Informatics Institute (PHII). RWJF is a philanthropist orgainsation heavily involved in electronic health tracking and “evidenced based medicine”.
In October 1987, the Mectizan® Donation Program was announced where Merck & Co., Inc., the discoverer of Mectizan® (ivermectin, M.D.), a “very safe” drug, donated the drug, without cost, for the treatment of Onchocerciasis (river blindness) for as long as was needed, this act ushered in the era known as “pharmacophilanthropy”. [2]
FDA: All safety doubts about vaccines are not allowed to exist
Published in the June 1, 1984 US Federal Register, and on the back of the polio vaccine fiasco, the FDA made very clear their protective policy position on polio vaccines:
..any possible doubts, whether or not well founded, about the safety of the vaccine cannot be allowed to exist in view of the need to assure that the vaccine will continue to be used to the maximum extent consistent with the nation’s public health objectives…the importance of the vaccine and of maintaining public confidence in the immunization program that depends on it…
“Note: This policy was likely made in response to concerns that the specific polio vaccines which later paralyzed were not the ones that had been tested in the clinical trials. Sadly, the FDA’s “solution” was to simply stop testing all the vaccine lots.”
This position has carried over to all products categorised as a “vaccine”. Any safety concerns have to be qushed, regardless of their validity, as it would lead to would cause vaccine hesitancy and threaten the “immunization” program. [1]
[Throughout history the medical establishment has failed to successfully treat infectious disease, they found some success with vaccines, and this lucrative narrative has prevailed and been their cornerstone. Other successful natural treatments and modalities have systematically been deemed quackery!]
Hiroshima bomb spurs “purpose” for the eventural human genome project
On December 9 to 13, 1984 at the the Alta Summit, a ski resort in Utah, the Department of Energy (DOE) and the International Commission for Protection Against Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens sponsored a meeting which begins the threads of the human genome project. [1, 2, 3, 4]
“Alta links human genome projects to research on the effects of the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki 40 years earlier. If genome projects prove important to biology, then historians will note the Alta meeting.”…”The purpose was to ask those working on the front lines of DNA analytical methods to address a specific technical question: could new methods permit direct detection of mutations, and more specifically could any increase in the mutation rate among survivors of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings be detected (in them or in their children)?”
“The idea behind the Alta meeting came from another meeting on March 4 and 5, 1984, in Hiroshima, at which new DNA analytical tools were deemed second highest priority for human mutations research, just behind establishing cell lines from atomic bomb survivors, their progeny, and controls.”
In time it will morph into association with “climate change“, noting the Dept of Energy sponsored in the first place!
First genetically engineered vaccine approved by FDA – a “new era for vaccine production”
Commercial production of the first genetically altered vaccine for humans was approved by the FDA on July 24, 1986, “opening what Federal officials called a new era for vaccine production.”
The new genetically engineered hepatitis B vaccine, “is to be marketed as Recombivax HB by Merck, Sharpe & Dohme” and avoids the use of human blood – a concern in an era of HIV. “Hepatatis B is often called ”serum hepatitis” because it is primarily transmitted through infected blood and blood components, as in blood transfusions or contaminated needles.” but can also be transmitted through infected saliva or semen.
“A milder and more common form of the disease, hepatitis A, is spread largely by contaminated food and water or personal contact.”
The beginnings of Artificial Intelligence
According to Dr Eli David every Deep Learning AI algorithm used in 2020, for vision, speech, text or cybersecurity, is based on an algorithm that dates back to a 1986 paper co-authored by Geoffery E Hinton. The “back-propagation” algorithm is used for “training the neural net, for gradually updating the synapses of the neural network until it trains.”
1986 Act: US government makes vaccine makers 100% Liability Free
Following a 1977 Immunization Conference which called for a “no-fault” compensation system, on the back of manufactures facing increasing lawsuits, California’s Democrat Representative Henry Waxman introduced (for the second time) a bill to congress, which on October 14, 1986 was passed, and the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA), HR5546, was then signed into law “with mixed feelings”, [6] by President Ronald Reagan, “as part of a larger health bill on November 14, 1986″ [1, 4, 5]
Vaccine manufacture Wyeth (now Pfizer) allegedly told President Reagan that vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe” and that phrase is written in the preamble of the VICP statute, this phrase was reiterated in 2011 Supreme Court ruling. [9, 10]
The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (PL 99-660) established the [13]:
- National Vaccine Program (NVP) Office in 1986 – to coordinate R&D
- Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) – est 1988. The law established a Vaccine Injury Table [12]
- Noteworthy, in 1988 the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) was created within the FDA to regulate vaccines
- National Vaccine Advisory Committee (NVAC)
- Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS)
- Mandated a 6-month supply of vaccines
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) then established the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), co-administered by FDA and CDC, to accept all reports of suspected adverse events, in all age groups, after the administration of any U.S.-licensed vaccine. The 1986 Act “required healthcare providers and vaccine manufacturers to report to the Department of Health and Human Services specific adverse events” following the administration of all vaccines. [2]
In the US “before 1985, the recommended immunization schedule included only seven vaccines” by 4 months of age: measles, mumps, rubella, (MMR), oral polio (OPV), diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis (DTP) vaccines were given plus Td at 15 years (5 jabs, 24 doses & 4 oral). By 2016 the schedule increased to 74 doses, 53 injections and 3 oral vaccines. [3]
The Institute of Medicine in their 2013 report [11] of the “first… attempt to examine the entire childhood immunization schedule” acknowledged that “Studies designed to examine the long-term effect of the cummulative number of vaccines or other aspects of the immunization schedule have not been conducted” [11]
The NCVIA removed all legal liability (and incentives to create safe vaccines) from manufactures for vaccine injury or death. The government (tax payer) became liable for vaccine injury payouts made through “Vaccine Court” which was created in 1988.
Dr Malone states this Act “has created an incentive structure with the familiar problem of coupling private profit to public risk, and has resulted in widespread corruption of both FDA/CBER and CDC.”
Australia uses many vaccines manufactured off-shore and the TGA use international regulators such as the FDA. Australian doctors refer to the CDC website for vaccine guidance.
In the years following the Act, (1988-2017) journal articles and patent applications for vaccines has increased substantially in the face of no legal liability. [7, 8]
Barbara Loe Fisher, a pioneer of the Vaccine Injury Awareness movement, was intemately involved in the initial bill, which immediately after it was passed, it was altered and removed the clauses that parents demanded! – INTERVIEW [14]
The Fourth World Wilderness Congress
The Fourth World Wilderness Congress (WWC) :Worldwide Conservation, the Proceedings of the Symposium on Biosphere Reserves was held in Denver, USA on September 11-18, 1987 [1, 2]
The 4th WWC involved 1600 delegates from 62 nations, among them Ms Gro Harlem Brundtland (Prime Minister of Norway) and Maurice Strong, David Rockerfeller, James Baker and Edmund de Rothschild. [4, 5, 6, 7] “The conference ultimately revolved around the question of financing for the burgeoning environmental movement that Strong had shaped from the ground up through his work at the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP).”
It was at this conference that Rothschild called for a World Conservation Bank, which he envisioned as the funding mechanism for a “second Marshall Plan” that would be used for third world “debt relief” and “sustainable development.” [6, 7, 8]
George Hunt came to learn that the New World Order refers to the coming boundary-less world as the fourth world wilderness!
UN: Montreal Protocol on Ozone Depletion signed
On September 15, 1987 the United Nations members adopted the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, referred to as a “landmark multilateral environmental agreement” which regulates the production and consumption of nearly 100 man-made chemicals referred to as ozone depleting substances (ODS).
“The Montreal Protocol …emerged as a model for future efforts, based as it was on strong science, globally agreed-upon standards, and aggressive action by relevant industries…Relying on the formal international system alone to defend the environment risks a tragedy of the global commons: collective inaction because no country has much of an incentive to favor conservation except when national interests coincide.” writes political scientist and head of Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) in 2002 – the drivers of “One Health“. [2]
On November 9, 1987, 24 days later, NASA’s director Dr. James E. Hansen testifies as a “private citizen” to the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resource, responding to a Nov 2, 1987 letter requesting he provide his “views on the likely pace and regional implications of the greenhouse effect and global climate change…” [1]
NASA director testifies re greenhouse gas effect on climate change
On November 9, 1987, 24 days after the Montreal Protocol agreement, NASA’s director, Dr. James E. Hansen testifies as a “private citizen” to the US Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resource, responding to their Nov 2, 1987 letter requesting he provide his “views on the likely pace and regional implications of the greenhouse effect and global climate change…” [1]
Hansen said NASA began their “climate simulations in 1958 when CO2 began to be measured accurately”, measurements of other trace gases such as methane, chlorofluorocarbons (CFC) and nitrous oxide “began more recently”, though their trends were estimated back to 1958. Hansen presented three “trace gas” scenarios from their global climate model running the predictions from 1958 through to 2030.
“The model says that within 20 years global mean temperature [of 15°C] will rise above the levels of the last two inter-glacial periods and the earth will be warmer than it has been in the past few hundred thousand years.” The graph he refers to is in the pivotal paper published November 1988, the beginnings of “Global Warming“.
“…at the present time in the 1980’s in a given month, there are almost as many areas colder than normal as areas warmer than normal…in a few decades from now it is warm almost everywhere.”
“The greenhouse effect is real, it is coming soon, and it will have major effects on all peoples.” Hansen stated, NASA “must have major improvements in our observations and understanding of the climate system”. Which would require funding!
“Our Common Future” defines Sustainable Development
Following resolution 38/161 a “Process of preparation of the Environmental Perspective to the Year 2000 and Beyond”, in December 1983 the United Nations Secretary-General chose Norwegian Prime Minister Gro Harlem Brundtland to chair a special, independent commission to develop a formula for a “global agenda for change”. Brundtland and her co-chair chose all other task force members, referred to as the World Commission on Environment and Development. [3] This resolution traces back to the creation of the UNEP in 1972.
Four years later, on December 11, 1987, the Brundtland Commission presented their report, “Our Common Future”, to the 42nd UN World Assembly. This report defined and popularized the term Sustainable Development, and is the precursor to Agenda 21.
In this landmark report it said that: “Humanity has the ability to make development sustainable – to ensure that it meets needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs”. It also called for “a new era of environmentally sound economic development”. [1, 2]
FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) was created
In 1988 the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) was created within the FDA to regulate biological products, including blood, vaccines, tissue, allergenics, and biological therapeutics.
There was a merger of FDA Drug and Biologics departments on June 30, 2003 but vaccines and gene therapy products remained with CBER [1, 2]
NASA: James Hansen testifies that man-made Global Warming is underway
On June 23, 1988, Dr James Hansen, director of the NASA Goddard Space Institute, gave testimony to the U.S. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources presenting his computer simulated climate warming findings which were published 2 months later, on August 20, 1988, in the paper titled “Global Climate Changes as Forecast by Goddard Institute for Space Studies – Three-Dimensional Model“. [3]
This testimony, predicted man-made Global Warming through man-made greenhouse gas emissions that were warming the Earth’s atmosphere. They considered the combined effects of five greenhouse gases: CO2, CFC11, CFC12, N2O, and CH4 and predicted, via computer simulations, a “warming of 0.5°C per decade”. [1, 2]
- This computer Model II CAN NOT be checked as NASA lost [3] the 1988 “source code“!
- Hansen also provided testimony as a “private citizen” 7 1/2 months prior on November 9, 1987, where he shares these same findings.
- Hansen testifies again to the House committee on July 7, 1988.
Six months later in December 1988 the UN IPCC is established
More on Climate Change – HERE
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) was established
The establishment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) to “assess the available scientific, technical, and socio-economic information” on climate change was endorsed by UN General Assembly on December 6, 1988 (resolution 43/53 presented by the government of Malta). [1, 2]
A few months earlier on June 23, 1988, James Hansen of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) testified at the US Congressional hearing on Energy and Natural Resources and stated that he is 99 percent sure global warming is under way outside of normal variability of climate.
Maurice Strong, the founding director of UNEP wrote the terms of reference for the IPCC. The first term of reference was the “narrow” definition of climate change (@45:40) and “he deliberately limited it to human causes of climate change” thus eliminating all natural variability! [3]
“Following his exposure for bribery and corruption in the UN’s Oil-for-Food scandal Maurice Strong was stripped of many of his 53 international awards and honours he had collected during his lifetime working in dual role of arch conservationist and ruthless businessman” [5]
- Sometime in 1997, but definitely by January 14, 1998, James Hansen reported via email to Worldwatch, that NASA had changed the estimated average global temperature of 15 degrees Celsius to a lower “better base number” of 14 degrees Celsius, which instantly made the global average temperature reach a “record high” of 14.40°C in 1997! [4] What wasn’t clear was they changed the historical yearly records multiple times.
- In his 1993 book on page 83, Prof McMichael stated the “Average temperature over past 10,000 years = 15°C” – an inconvenient number if “Global Warming” was to be the agenda
- In 1991 the Club of Rome decided in their published report, that in the post Cold War era the “threat of global warming” would be the “new enemy to unite us” and that “humanity itself” would be “the real enemy”!
mRNA vaccine platform technology invented
Dr Robert Malone developed the platform technology that allowed mRNA to transfer into mammalian cells, by packaging it in a liposome with a positive charge. A liposome is a lipid sac that can carry drugs or other substances like mRNA into cells. This technology “induced a cellular immune response,” thus could be used as a vaccine.
Dr Malone’s patents contain “the first published research on mRNA vaccination” [1, 2, 3]
“In 1989, research was performed that gave rise to the groundbreaking patents on mRNA vaccination, all with a priority date of March 21, 1989. This is the same priority date as the Salk Patent application, showing that the two institutions were working together.”
Future lipid nanoparticle delivery systems are based on Dr Malone’s foundation technology.
The story of mRNA vaccine invention READ >>>
Berlin Wall falls, the Cold War declared over
On November 9, 1989 the Berlin Wall separating East and West Germany fell, figuratively the “Iron Curtain”, fell. It marked “one of the series of events that started the fall of communism in Central and Eastern Europe”. [1, 2]
Three weeks later on December 2-3, 1989 during the Malta Summit meeting US President George H. W. Bush and Soviet Union General Secretary Mikhail Gorbachev declared the Cold War Over.
The globalist now needed a “new enemy“… “which demands the solidarity of all peoples” – thus the “global warming” narrative begins to take shape.
TGA established as a National Drug Regulator
The history of drug and substance control in Australia can be traced back to before 1938, and through an evolution of changes led to the establishment in 1990 of the national Therapeutics Goods Administration (TGA). This Federal Department of Health regulatory body was set up to “safeguard and enhance the health of the Australian community through effective and timely regulation of therapeutic goods”, overviewing quality, safety and efficacy of therapeutic goods as a regulator and watchdog for both premarket and post-market pharmacovigilance. [1]
US VAERS established
The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) was established in 1990 in the US to be an early warning system for the CDC and FDA to detect possible safety problems in US-licensed vaccines.
In 1986 vaccine manufacture liability was removed, so this system became the main means of post-marketing surveillance of short and long-term vaccine safety. The data collected is used to make claims about vaccine safety, which is only as good as the adverse event reports entered. VAERS went online in 2002.
The Harvard study commissioned by the CDC in 2007, concluded that “fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported” to VAERS.
With this passive reporting system, that many US healthcare providers are not even aware they are require by law to report to, makes the robustness of the under-reported data poor, and thus affects the system’s ability to effectively identify “warning signals” or support the common claim that there is a “1 in a million” risk.
A controlled study looking at anaphylaxis reactions following mRNA COVID-19 vaccines showed 2.47 events per 10,000 jabs (0.027%), yet VAERS data reports indicated only 2.5 to 4.7 events per 1,000,000 jabs, a 100% difference. This is in line with the conclusions of the 2010 Harvard report.
Human antibody titres to coronavirus infection are found to be short lived
A study shows that people infected with coronaviruses have short-lived active antibodies, but have a mild infection a year later if re-exposed. [1]
This is problematic for a vaccine which would expect a long-lived immune response. Early treatment approaches against viral infections have been demonstrated to be cheap and effective.
International Council on Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) established
The International Council on Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) was established in September 1990 after more than 200 local governments from 43 countries convened at the World Congress of Local Governments for a Sustainable Future, at the United Nations in New York. It was “conceived in 1989 when 35 local government leaders from Canada and the USA met with a leading atmospheric scientist to discuss the depletion of the ozone layer.” [2]
In 1991, the ICLEI wrote Chapter 28 of Agenda 21 including the mandate for all local authorities to prepare a “local Agenda 21.” The final version was approved at the Earth Summit and stipulated that “by 1996 , most local authorities in each country should have undertaken a consultative process with their population and achieved a consensus on a local Agenda 21 for the(ir) communities.” [3]
In 2003, ICLEI’s rebranded as ‘ICLEI – Local Governments for Sustainability‘ with a broader mandate to address sustainability issues. [1] The World Secretariat moved to Bonn, Germany, in 2009.
“ICLEI was created to implement Agenda 21 through out the world”…”giving the illusion of local control, but it circumvents requirements for ratification of international treaties” says Rosa Koire in 2012. [3]
Today (2022) ICLEI is a global network of more than 2500 local and regional governments committed to sustainable urban development.
WHO launch Children’s Vaccine Initiative (CVI)
At the WHO’s World Summit For Children in September 29-30, 1990 the Children’s Vaccine Initiative (CVI) was launched with the aim of getting 80% of the world’s children under the age of 1 year vaccinated with “under-used” vaccines by the year 2000. The program was co-sponsoered by UNICEF, UNPG, World Bank and Rockefeller Foundation. With the overarching “goal” to achieve a world in which all people at risk are protected against vaccine-preventable diseases. [1, 2]
The objective was not only to increase the number of vaccine antigens available to children, but to provide multivalent vaccine formulations that may be administered with fewer inoculations. [3]
The Human Genome Project is launched
The Human Genome Project officially began in October 1990 with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the National Institued of Health (NIH) publishing their plan for the first 5 years of what was projected to be a 15-year project in sequencing the entire human genome. Feasibility discussions actually began December 1984. [2, 3, 4] The budget expanded as time went on.
The goals of the project included: mapping the human genome and eventually determining the sequence of all 3.2 billion letters in it; mapping and sequencing the genomes of other organisms important to the study of biology; developing technology for analyzing DNA; and studying the ethical, legal and social implications of genome research. [1]
The genome sequencing endeavour was conceived in June 1985 at UCSC and was launched in 1990, through funding from the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Department of Energy (DOE) and concluded April 2003.
Also in 1990 the U.S. Department of Energy funds climate change research, through the Global Change Research Act of 1990, November 16, 1990. [5, 6, 7, 8]
Fastforward to 2020 and genetic vaccines meets diseases said to be the result of climate change and population growth.
Timeline of Discovery HERE
The Club of Rome decide the “new enemy” will be “humanity itself”
Sometime in 1991 in the Post Cold War era, the Club of Rome (a globalist think tank) published The First Global Revolution which in it they wrote “we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming…and the like“ would become the “new enemy to unite us” and that “these phenomena do constitue a common threat which demands the solidarity of all peoples“. They went on to state “all these dangers are caused by human intervention“…“humanity itself” is “the real enemy”. [1]
The following year in June 1992, Brundtland’s “Our Common Future” report formed the basis for Agenda 21 at the UNCED Earth Summit.
Where the UNFCCC was signed which “established an international environmental treaty to combat “dangerous human interference with the climate system”.
UN OCHA is established
On December 19, 1991 at the United Nations General Assembly the members adopt UN resolution 46/182, which called for stronger international leadership in response to complex emergencies and natural disasters as a result the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) was established. [1, 2]
OCHA’s Relief Web news site reports on relief activities such as profits made by mRNA COVID-19 vaccine manufactures while poor countries remain unvaccinated!
WEF started the Young Global Leaders program
The World Economic Forum (WEF) (a private enterprise founded in 1971 by Klaus Schwab) started Global Leaders for Tomorrow school in 1992, which was re-established in 2004 as the Young Global Leaders (YGL) program. Attendees must apply for admission and are then subjected to a rigorous selection process. [7, 8, 9]
The program is commitment is to “improving the state of the world”, which means grooming their acolytes and helping them “penetrate” positions of influence and government around the world. [4, 5, 6]
The first class had in it Angela Merkel, Bill Gates, later Aznar (former Spanish PM), Macron, Jens Spaan, Justin Trudeau and Jacinda Ardern. [1, 2]
Prelude to Agenda 21: The Convention on Biological Diversity adopted at Nairobi Conference
In response to the threat of species extinction caused by human activity and inspired by the world community’s growing commitment to sustainable development, the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP), led by Maurice Strong, convened the Ad Hoc Working Group of Experts on Biological Diversity in November 1988 to explore the need for an international convention on biological diversity. The UNEP established the Ad Hoc Working Group of Technical and Legal Experts to prepare an international legal instrument for the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity. [1, 2, 5]
By February 1991, the Ad Hoc Working Group had become known as the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee. At the May 22, 1992 Nairobi Conference the “agreed text” was adopted for the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD)
The CBD was opened for signatures on June 5, 1992 at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) (the Rio “Earth Summit”) and by June 4, 1993 it had received 168 Member State signatures. The Convention entered into force on December 29, 1993. [4]
Following the convention, they identified a need for “a practical tool for translating the principles of Agenda 21 into reality,” – The UNEP created the Global Biodiversity Assessment book which was published in 1995 by Cambridge University. This book “takes Agenda 21 and breaks down what each Nation is going to look like to save the planet…it tells you what is not sustainable, and therefore needs to be limited or eliminated. [3]
UNCED Earth Summit – Agenda 21
In 1987 the Trilateral Commission’s member Gro Harlem Brundtland presnted to the World Assembly the World Commission on Environment and Development task force’s report called Our Common Future. This report defined and popularized the term Sustainable Development for world consumption. [1]
From June 3-14, 1992 the United Nations Committee for Environment and Development (UNCED) ‘Earth Summit‘ was held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. It was organised by co-author, Maurice Strong, who is also the UNEP secretary general. [2, 3, 4]
The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) was signed which “established an international environmental treaty to combat “dangerous human interference with the climate system”, in part by stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere” [8]
Also at this conference “The Agenda for the 21st Century” (Agenda 21) was born. Brundtland’s report received praise and accolades from the UN for providing the framework for a sustainable future. [5, 6, 7]
Officially “Agenda 21 is the framework for activity into the 21st century addressing the combined issues of environment protections and fair and equitable development for all.”
According to extensive research by Patrick Wood, “Agenda 21 is a … comprehensive blueprint specifically designed to change our way of life and our form of government.” And as Rosa Koire [9] states the Agenda 21 sustainable development is the:
“…inventory and control plan of all land, water, all minerals, all plants, all animals, all construction, all means of production, all food, all energy, all information and all human beings.“
In 2015, Agenda 21 was significantly expanded to become Agenda 2030, a 15 year plan to achieve 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
The new “sustainable” or “green” economic paradigm is highly correlated with the original 1934 specification for Technocracy, namely, that it is a resource-based economic system that uses energy as the “currency”. Think “Carbon-Credits, “Smart Cities”, and know that the UN documents stress the doctrine of ‘no one left behind.”
A UN publication “Agenda 21: The Earth Summit Strategy to Save our Planet” states “Agenda 21 proposes an array of actions which are intended to be implemented by every person on Earth…it calls for specific changes in the activities of all people… Effective execution of Agenda 21 will require a profound reorientation of all humans, unlike anything the world has ever experienced.”
The Earth Summit allowed the World Conservation Bank to become a reality. Now known as the “Global Environment Facility” (GEF), is the largest public funder of global environmental projects. The GEF is the financial mechanism for the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), the organizing convention directing the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
George Hunt attended meetings leading up to this Earth Summit, on May 1, 1992 he released a video warning of what he witnessed.
The Convention on Biological Diversity at UN Earth Summit
The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) was opened for signatures on 5 June 1992 at the United Nations Conference (UNCED) on Environment and Development (the Rio “Earth Summit”) and entered into force on 29 December 1993 as a legally binding global treaty which Australia signed.
The CBD is said to be “inspired by the world community’s growing commitment to sustainable development.” the result of UNEP ad hoc intergovernmental workshops starting in 1988, including a sub-workshop on biotechnology as “a valuable contribution to resource conservation and sustainable development.”
At it’s core, the Biodiversity Convention’s “true mission was capturing and using biodiversity for the sake of the biotechnology industry,” and “protecting the pharmaceutical and emerging biotechnology industries”. [1, 2]
“[T]he convention implicitly equates the diversity of life – animals and plants – to the diversity of genetic codes, for which read genetic resources. By doing so, diversity becomes something modern science can manipulate.” [3, 4]
This convention treaty sets up the justification for classifying, mapping and cataloguing nature down to it’s genetic code using emerging technologies from that time.
Starting with the Global Taxonomy Initiative (GTI), justified as “taxonomy is essential to implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity,”
- 1990 Human Genome Project begins
- 1990 PhyloCode theoretical foundation
- 2000 PhyloCode first draft includes “Provisions for Hybrids”
- 2003 DNA barcoding was conceived,
- 2004 International Phylogenetic Nomenclature meetings began
- 2008 The International Barcode of Life Consortium (iBOL) began
Two scientists who attended the conference wrote pg 42 of the book The Earth Brokers:
“The Convention implicitly equates the diversity of life – animals and plants to the diversity of genetic codes. By doing so, diversity becomes something modern science can manipulate. It promotes biotechnology as being ‘essential for the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity” – WATCH
Legislation allows FDA to be funded by Pharmaceutical giants
On September 22, 1992, the US Congress passed H.R.5952, the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA), which was signed into law October 29, 1992. This Act allowed the pharmaceutical sponsor to “fund the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) directly through “user fees” intended to support the cost of swiftly reviewing drug applications. With the Act, the FDA moved from a fully taxpayer funded entity to one supplemented by industry money. The PDUFA fees collected have increased 30 fold—from around $29m in 1993 to $884m in 2016.” PDUFA fee schedule is renewed every five years. [1, 2, 3]
New drugs have patents, which have a time limit before they expire, and research and development (R&D) costs cannot be recouped until a product gains regulatory approval. The FDA estimated a 30 day delay could cost the drug sponsor $10 million, and the regulator already had a backlog of drugs awaiting approval. A faster regulatory process was argued to be in the interest of the manufactures (lower cost to market), the regulator (fund more staff) and consumers (life saving drugs!). [1]
Spurred on by the AIDS and Cancer epidemics a presidential advisory panel on drug approval reported on August 16, 1990 that it “estimated that thousands of lives were lost each year due to delays in approval” and suggested it “should speed up approval of experimental AIDS and cancer drugs by requiring less evidence of the drugs’ effectiveness before they are put on the market”. [4, 5]
The regualtory staff are effectively hired by the pharmaceutical company to appove and market their products.
Between 1993 and 2003 the median approval time for priority New Drug Applications (NDA) and Biologics License Applications (BLA) decreased by over half — from 13.2 months to 6.4 months respectively, and standard approvals by one third from 22.1 months to 13.8 months. They increased efficiencies “while holding to the same high standard of evidence for drug safety and effectiveness”. PDUFA funding enabled increased review staff numbers to increase FDA-sponsor interactions for scientific and regulatory consultation at a number of critical milestones through-out drug development prior to submission (fig 3.1). [6]
On December 7, 1995 the FDA approved Roche Laboratories’ saquinavir, the first of a new category of drugs called protease inhibitors designed to prevent the HIV virus from replicating, in combination with older nucleoside analogue medications such as AZT, it took the FDA only 97 days after the agency received the marketing application to grant the red light. [5]
In June 2020 the British Medical Journal (BMJ) asked six leading global regulators in Australia, Canada, Europe, Japan, the UK, and US, “questions about their funding, transparency in their decision making (and of data), and the rate at which new drugs are approved” and they found that “industry funding of drug regulators has become the international norm.”
The concept of Evidence-Based Medicine is born
A paper published November 4, 1992 by Guyatt et al called “Evidence-Based Medicine: A New Approach to Teaching the Practice of Medicine” with the stated intent of Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) being “to shift the emphasis in clinical decision making from “intuition, unsystematic clinical experience, and pathophysiologic rationale” to scientific, clinically relevant research.” And so began the EBM movement.
Through the years EBM displaced “the doctor-patient unit as the ultimate decision-making authority”. EBM was quickly “hijaked” by industry to ” serve agendas different from what it originally aimed for.” To promote industry products through “clinical practice guidelines.” The guidelines are determined by a “consensus of “experts” who are often captured by industry funding, which “ironically, many guideline recommendations are based on low quality, or no evidence,” and fall short of trustworthy standards.
EBM “relies heavily on studies of large populations and therefore statistics, which are inherently unreliable and easy to manipulate“, yet these population level studies are used to “dictate” a one-size fits all treatment – ignoring clinical experience and individual patient needs. [2]
A cornerstone of EBM is the hierarchical system of classifying evidence known as the levels of evidence, where randomized controlled trials (RCT) are considered the highest level and case series or expert opinions are the lowest level. [1]
He who controls the “evidence” controls “the science” and then in turn “influences” third party “health officials” to formulate clinical practice guidelines (protocols) that hospital administrators then force their doctors to follow! [3, 4, 5]
Read more >>>
Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO) is created
In 1993 the Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO) is created through the merger of the Industrial Biotechnology Association and the Association of Biotechnology Companies both small Washington-based biotechnology trade (and lobby) organizations, who hired Washington veteran Carl B. Feldbaum as their first president. In 1993 there were but a handful of biotechnology drugs and vaccines on the market and the human genome project was only recently begun.
BIO hosts the largest biotechnology annual event in the world, which “dates back to 1987, when the Association of Biotechnology Companies hosted an international conference in Washington, D.C., that exceeded expectations by attracting 155 attendees”, which grew to 1,400 in 1993 and 14,000 by 2001. [1]
- Early BIO timeline HERE
- BIO lobbies the FDA – WATCH, and helps support FDA‘s efforts! WATCH
- BIO is working to “combat” legislations/policy that doesn’t work in their favour of biotechnology and science, with Big Pharma as their funding partners.
- BIO targeting adult vaccination, to get everyone! – WATCH
- BIO making short films to influence opinion? – WATCH
Fast forward 2021 to the COVID-19 pandemic where a new bio-pharma mRNA injectable platform product was accelerated through the regulatory agencies under emergency use, where otherwise no regulatory pathway had been established for a gene therapy vaccine, this lobby group, “BIO”, who’s members include Pfizer, Moderna, Gilead and more, funded the “public health nonprofit” “innovative media” organisation called the Public Good Projects (PGP) in turn paid for pro-vaccine action and the take down of counter-narrative doctors and nurses. [2, 3]
World Trade Center – Twin Tower Bombing
On 26th February 1993, just one month after President Clinton’s inauguration, just after noon a bomb went off in the “parking garage beneath the World Trade Center,” killing six people and injuring more than 1,000 others. [1, 2, 3]
“This event was the first indication for the Diplomatic Security Service (DSS) that terrorism was evolving from a regional phenomenon outside of the United States to a transnational phenomenon”. The FBI stated the “Middle Eastern terrorism had arrived on American soil—with a bang”.
This “terrorist attack” comes just 3 years after the fall of the Berlin Wall, an event that marks the end of the US-Soviet Union Cold War, and with it an end to the justification of a huge military budget with no enemy.
But on July 1, 1994, President Clinton introduced the National Security Strategy as a way to “sustain our active engagement abroad” [4, 5]
With few, if any, military threats to the US, Clinton defined security as including “protecting … our way of life” in order to seize the new opportunities for prosperity presented in the post-Cold War environment. The general approach of this strategy is “globalist” with “selective engagement” in areas and events in which the US has “particular interest”.
The World Wide Web is launched into the public domain
On April 30, 1993, CERN in Switzerland, declared the underlying code for the World Wide Web (WWW or W3) to be made available on a royalty-free basis, forever, thus launching the WWW into the public domain. [1]
Sir Tim Berners-Lee a British computer scientist based at CERN is credited with invented the World Wide Web in March 1989 following his Information Management “Proposal“. His aim was to “work toward a universal linked information system” creating a universal computing language so as to share information between the interconnected network of computers (the internet) all around the world. Berners-Lee realised they could share information by exploiting an emerging technology called hypertext. [3, 6]
By October of 1990, Tim had written the three fundamental technologies that remain the foundation of today’s web:
- HTML: HyperText Markup Language.
- URI: Uniform Resource Identifier, commonly called URL
- HTTP: Hypertext Transfer Protocol
By the end of 1990, the first web page was served on the open internet, and in 1991, people outside of CERN were invited to join this new web community. Following CERN’s 1993 code release, Tim moved to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in 1994 and founded the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), an international community devoted to developing open web standards. He remains the Director of W3C to this day. [2]
The history of the internet can be traced back to 1945. [4, 5]
With the advent of the World Wide Web together with search engines such as Google, all manner of information (true, false and in-between) became increasingly and instantly accessible to anyone with a computer.
WHO: Public-Private Partnerships begin
On May 3, 1993 the World Health Assembly called on the World Health Organisation (WHO) to encourage the support of all partners in health development, including non-governmental organizations (NGO) and private voluntary organisations – thus marking the begining of the public-private partnerships. WHO members raised concern of vested interests influencing decisions, but alleged safeguards are put in place to remedy this possibility. [1, 2]
The WHO knew that “over time informal exchanges may lead to the development of formal relations between WHO and NGOs”. [3, 4] Which by 2002 was already a huge list.
Three months after taking office as WHO Director General and armed with her promise to “change the course of things” and “make a difference“, Dr Gro Harlem Brundtland initiated a meeting with ten senior pharmaceutical representatives of the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association (IFPMA) who, on October 21, 1998, decided join forces to help 100 million people world wide who are “deprived of easy access to the most essential drugs and vaccines”.
The United Nations in 2012 reported the growing concern about the “influence of major corporations and business lobby groups within the UN.”
Inventor of PCR test wins Nobel Prize in Chemistry
In 1983, Kary Mullis figured out the steps to amplify DNA sequences called process called polymerase chain reaction (PCR). On October 13, 1993 he was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for developing this procedure. [watch] [1]
His prizes and patents can be found here.
Kary Mullis said PCR test is used to “make a whole lotta somethin’ out of somethin’, and the “PCR test, if you do it well, you can find almost anything.”
PCR tests are being used to “diagnose” COVID-19 disease, in both symptomatic and asymptomatic (healthy) people to determine if they are infectious. The PCR test kits are not standardised, each one uses a different, tiny fragment of the SARS-CoV-2 virus genome, it doesn’t test for the whole virus and it cannot determine if the fragment is part of a viable infectious pathogen. [2] Greater than 20 cycles are problematic, 45 cycles was recommended for SARS-CoV-2 testing protocol.
The PCR technique can produce a billion copies of the target sequence in just a few hours. [3]
The functional importance of small RNA is first described
Functionally important small RNA were first described in nematodes and published December 3, 1993. This begins the scientific understanding that not all RNA codes for a protein. It was not until 2001 that the functionality of micro RNA (miRNA), which are noncoding small RNA 18 to 26 nucleotides (nt) long, were understood, and to not be just confinded to the lower orders. [1, 2]
It was in 2005 that the regulatory function of miRNA’s begins to emerge. Gene expression is regulated by these non-coding miRNA’s, which in turn help regulate biological pathways – such as the immune system. This emerging field of gene regulation is know as epigenetics. [3]
Timeline pages:
1800s | 1900-1945 | 1946-1979 | 1980-1999 | 2000-2015 | 2016-2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023