COVID-19 Pandemic
2021
Timeline of significant global, Australian data points continuing into the second year of the COVID-19 Pandemic.
The first year of mass global rollout of brand new, experimental genetic technology COVID-19 vaccines and their lockstep vaccine mandates!
Navigate the timeline pages:
1800s | 1900-1945 | 1946-1979 | 1980-1999 | 2000-2015 | 2016-2018 | 2019 | 2020 | You Are Here | 2022 | 2023
Quick links to months of 2021:
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sept | Oct | Nov | Dec2021 still requires a lot more data points, which in time will be added.
Vaccine Adverse Event reports exceeds CDC’s expected daily maximum
By January 1, 2021 daily Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) reports received by CDC’s contractor General Dynamics Information Technology (GDIT) exceeded the expected worse case scenario of 1,000/day, this actually happened within 6 days of US roll out. [1]
On August 27, 2020 the CDC awarded GDIT a $35.4 million contract to manage the incoming VAERS reports. The FOIA’d “contract states that they were expecting up to 1,000 VAERS reports to be filed per day, with up to 40% of the reports being serious in nature”, up from the historical 5%. Reports exceeded 4,500/day on January 11, 2021.
Stories of vaccine injury were flooding social media in early January…but these were censored by Facebook and Twitter!
A month later on February 12, 2021 The New York Times reported that 34 million Americans had received a COVID-19 vaccine, but that “numerous federal health officials” had told them the FDA safety monitoring system “won’t be capable of analyzing safety data for weeks or months”! The Times also stated that “few serious problems have been reported through” VAERS and”no deaths have conclusively been linked to the vaccines.”
In February GDIT was asking for a 7 digit ID code to cope with the huge influx, as well as additional symptom codes, they reported processing a “record high” of over 40,000 VAERS reports in February, but have a backlog of 115,000 reports, and by March GDIT renegotiated their contract to accommodate a “minimum” of 25, 000 reports/week which approximates to 3570/day! In March they processed 60,200 reports, but were still “unable to keep up with the increased surge in reports”. They empolyed “over 90” backlog staffing positions – which continued every month for 2021. [2]
Mean while Fauci and Biden et al were claiming safe and effective!
New Beta variant escapes vaccine “immune protection”, starts talk of booster shots
As early as January 4, 2021, within weeks of the COVID-19 vaccine roll-out in the UK, their scientists expressed concerns that the new South African virus variant (501.V2) may render the new vaccines totally ineffective due to the spike protein mutations and “escape from immune protection”. [2]
The South African variant (B.1.351), later referred to as the Beta variant of concern (VOC), is thought to escape vaccine induced immunity. The virus mutations in the spike protein region, the target site for all COVID-19 vaccines, is a concern and has already prompted talk about developing booster shots. [1, 3]
“Developing” implies the manufactures are looking to “tweak” the spike protein mRNA code, which technically would require more clinical trials. They didn’t do this initially, boosters initially meant more jabs of the same Wuhan variant.
US: Thawed vaccine shots going to waste
From as early January 8, 2021 [1] reports began to emerge across the US, that health facilities were throwing out unused and spoiled COVID-19 vaccines.
“If a clinic has a no-show for a vaccine appointment that extra dose cannot be saved for the following day. Doses expire quickly after they’re thawed.” [1, 2, 3]
On January 4, 2021 the first US pharmacies start to administer the vaccines include Walgreens, CVS, & Walmart.
US remove vaccine allocation for states
On January 12, 2021 The US government reversed course and is now releasing its entire cache of COVID-19 vaccines to states — including doses previously reserved for second shots, Health and Human Services (HHS) czar Alex Azar, reasoned this to be because they “now believe that our manufacturing is predictable”.
The two vaccines currently authorised, Pfizer & Moderna, require a second doses, 21-28 days following the first dose. “The Trump administration had been holding back millions of doses to ensure that those who received the first shot would get their second.”
States are now encouraged “to immediately open up immunizations to everyone age 65 and older.”
Sinovac vaccine 50.4% efficacy
Sinovac is a Beijing-based bio-pharmaceutical company developing the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine called CoronaVac, an inactivated virus particle vaccine.
On January 13, 2021 the Brazillian clinical trial results were announced and found the vaccine to have 50.4% efficacy, BARELY over the 50% needed for regulatory approval.
Norway: 23 Elderly die following vaccine
As of January 14, 2021, 23 reports of deaths following COVID-19 vaccination had been reported to the Norwegian adverse reaction register. The Norwegian Medicines Agency have linked 13 of these deaths to “common” vaccine side effects – these were elderly nursing home patients, the very risk group we are trying to help. [1, 2]
13 of these deaths are in nursing home patients and “the reports may indicate that common side effects from mRNA vaccines, such as fever and nausea, may have led to deaths in some frail patients,” says Sigurd Hortemo, chief medical officer at the Norwegian Medicines Agency (NMA).
The NMA noted that the vaccine clinical trials “on which the temporary approval of the vaccine is based included very few people over the age of 85. We therefore know little about how any side effects will affect the very elderly.”
A week earlier, on January 7, 2021, 2 nursing home residents died a few days after receiving their Pfizer vaccine. Then two days after this report the post-vaccination death count rises to 29, but the age group affected is lowered to 75 years.
The UK watchdog says vaccine reactions are “normal”, following “33 elderly people living in nursing homes [who] died shortly after being immunized.”
Stories of vaccine injury and death floods social media
By January 14, 2021, just a few weeks after vaccine roll-out in the UK, US & Israel, reports of serious injuries and death following COVID-19 vaccinations have been flooding social media.
Drive-through vaccine “super-stations” were set up across the world to vaccinate as many people as possible, healthcare workers first, to get to “herd immunity”. [1, 2, 3]
A collection of allergic reactions were thought to come from a particular batch of 33,000 Moderna vials distributed across the US, providers were asked to “delay” administering that batch.
US Fact Sheet on WIV – risky research and military ties
On January 15, 2021 the US the State Department released a fact sheet on the Activity at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) which disclosed that the United States was aware that the lab had been conducting risky research on coronaviruses since 2016 and was conducting Secret CCP military reasearch at the lab. A fact that the NIH, NIAID and their head the HHS were all aware of. [1, 2]
WHO Emergency Committee continue PHEIC
On January 15, 2021 the WHO Emergency Committee decided to continue the Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) due to the “threat” of virus “variants”. The PHEIC is a necessary declaration to justify “emergency use” of vaccines.
At this point “the impact of vaccines in reducing transmission is yet unknown.”
The Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier released
Dr David Martin with his company M-CAM have since 1999 monitored patent activity in the arena of ‘health’ and compiled the comprehensive 205 page public document titled “The Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier” highlighting numerous breaches and violations of international law by the “experts” and agencies funded by taxpayers, and supplying all links to source material.
Martin states that the Dossier is
“one place to tell the story of corruption” and
“Crimes go unpunished if law enforcement don’t do their job.”
WHO: Medical Product Alert for PCR tests – Ct above 30 likely false positive
Just one hour after US Presidential Inauguration of Joe Biden, the WHO released a “Medical Product Alert” for PCR tests to “clarify” the previous Jan 13, 2021 notification, reiterating that false positive cases will occur if the PCR cycle threshold (Ct) is set too high. In short they now advise labs/physicians to be mindful of the need for clinical symptoms and to not use high amplification cycles (Ct 40 to 45), but to dial it back (Ct 30) and “manual adjustment” may be necessary. [1, 2]
On December 14, 2020 the WHO already warned about PCR cycle thresholds were too high, just as the vaccine roll out began!
No longer is PCR the “gold standard” for diagnosis, they refer to it now as “an aid for diagnosis”, meaning used in conjunction with other factors before declaring a diagnosis! Exactly what the alleged “skeptics” have been warning since November 2020 as the test is done on healthy, sympton-less people and a positive result renders that person statistically ill and is misleadingly considered “asymptomatic”. [1, 2]
Compare this to the WHO’s criteria for accepting a case of MERS in 2014, a positive antibody test was needed – proof of infection.
Throughout 2020 many global experts have been calling out the high false positive rates from the PCR test, which when used on masses of healthy people caused high numbers of “cases“, especially just before the November 3rd, 2020 US Presidential Election.
Each time PCR goes through a cycle, it doubles it reproduction, called amplification. The high number of cycles are known to return a high level of “false positives”. Any positive result was considered a “case” statistic and that person was “diagnosed”, often solely on the test, as infected, which is why the term “casedemic” emerged globally.
WHO Advice to healthcare professionals re COVID-19 vaccines
As per WHO Regulatory Update on COVID-19 they provide guidance to healthcare provides on how to answer COVID-19 vaccine related questions.
Their first claim is “there are still few effective anti-viral medicines for treatment of COVID-19 infection”, thereby justifying a vaccine. This is contrary to the experience of many frontline doctors.
TGA grants first COVID-19 vaccine Provisional Registration – Pfizer-BioNTech
On January 25, 2021 Australia’s TGA grants Provisional Registration for Pfizer Australia Pty Ltd‘s mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine for 16 years and older, the first vaccine for COVID-19 to receive “provisional approval” in Australia and the first new gene technology vaccine ever used. [1, 2, 3]
COMIRNATY (BNT162b2 [mRNA]) COVID-19 Vaccine has provisional approval for the indication below:
- Active immunisation to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by SARS-CoV-2
- The use of this vaccine should be in accordance with official recommendations.
- The decision has been made on the basis of short term efficacy and safety data. [clinical trial]
- Continued approval depends on the evidence of longer term efficacy and safety from ongoing clinical trials and post-market assessment.
This product, like all provisionally registered products, falls under the TGA black triangle safety monitoring scheme.
Moderna begins vaccine booster trials as evidence of “waning immunity” emerges
In a January 25, 2021 press release Moderna announce the “waning immunity” potential of their COVID-19 vaccine against mutating SARS-CoV-2 variants, in particular to the South African variant B.1.351 which is later called Beta. [1]
“Out of an abundance of caution and leveraging the flexibility of our mRNA platform, we are advancing an emerging variant booster candidate against the variant first identified in the Republic of South Africa into the clinic to determine if it will be more effective to boost titers against this and potentially future variants.” said Stéphane Bancel, Chief Executive Officer of Moderna, confirming talk from earlier in the month about boosters.
Moderna announced they will:
- First, “test an additional booster dos0 “of its current COVID-19 Vaccine (mRNA-1273) to study the ability to further increase neutralizing titers against emerging strains beyond the existing primary vaccination series.
- Second, they would begin “an emerging variant booster candidate (mRNA-1273.351) against the B.1.351 variant…into preclinical studies and a Phase 1 study in the U.S. to evaluate the immunological benefit of boosting with strain-specific spike proteins.
- Moderna expects either one will “further boost neutralizing titers in combination with all of the leading vaccine candidates.”
COVID-19 vaccines won’t stop infection or transmission of SARS-CoV-2
By January 26, 2021, it was already being talked about by public health experts, that the newly rolled-out COVID-19 vaccines will likely NOT prevent infection but more importantly they don’t know if it will stop community transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, the exact justification for mandating vaccines!
The vaccine trials were only designed to assess clinical disease (COVID-19) not prevention of infection or assessing their ability to stop transmission.
The argument supporting vaccination becomes that the vaccine will reduce viral load, and thus assumed to reduce community transmission. But “asymptomatic” individuals already have reduced viral load, if anything viable virus at all, and the already infected produce natural, long-lasting protection.
CDC begins defining a “vaccine breakthrough case” as “vaccine failure” becomes obvious
On January 27, 2021 the CDC (in an email obtained under Freedom of Information) defined a COVID-19 “vaccine breakthrough case” as
“a patient who has SARS-CoV-2 RNA or antigen detected on a respiratory specimen collected [greater than or equal to] 7 days after completing the primary series of an FDA-authorized SARS-CoV-2 vaccine” [1, 2]
Though in retrospect, we learn CDC’s Dr Fisher as early as December 21, 2020, only 7 days after rollout begins, he was directed by a superior “to start working on a protocol to evaluate COVID vaccine failures or breakthrough cases.” Also on January 30, 2021, CDC Director, Dr. Rochelle Walensky, began planting concern about virus variants being a “growing threat” of escaping the protection of vaccines.
On January 27, 2021 at the CDC a 1-page internal document about “vaccine failure” was being distributed by CDC medical officer Dr. Thomas Clark the Epoch Times reveals, but under FOIA it is fully redacted.
On February 2, 2021 in an email, the CDC’s Vaccine Breakthrough Case Investigation Team, led by Dr Fisher and part of the COVID-19 Vaccine Taskforce, alters the definition of a breakthough case to be least 14 days post the completion of a primary dose series of injections. This instantly eliminates cases and provides an inflated and misleading view of vaccine effectiveness. [3]
“A US. resident who has SARS-CoV-2 RNA or antigen detected on a respiratory specimen collected [greater than or equal to] 14 days after completing the primary series of an FDA-authorized COVID-19 Vaccine.”
On February 4, 2021 the CDC communicated with US States on how to count vaccine breakthrough cases and which to exclude!
It wasn’t until April 15, 2021 that the CDC began reporting vaccine Breakthrough Cases, which included some who were hospitalised and died. [4, 5]
On May 1, 2021 the ” CDC transitioned from monitoring all reported vaccine breakthrough cases to focus on identifying and investigating only hospitalized or fatal cases due to any cause”. [6, 7]
In an email to the Epoch Times it was claimed the “CDC made the change to the definition of a breakthrough infection time period due to the most current data that showed that the 14-day period was required for an effective antibody response to the vaccines.” At this point the CDC are assuming antibody production is equivalent to “preventing infection”, a theory. They claimed to have wanted to “eliminate cases where exposure [to the virus] happened before the vaccination response [antibody production] would be effective.”
As Dr Harvey Risch points out to Epoch Times, “If the vaccines don’t work for the first 7 or 14 days or increase risk of getting COVID-19 during that period, that is part of what happens when they [the mass vaccination program] are deployed in a population.”
Dr Jay Bhattacharya told The Epoch Times in an email, the CDC should have warned “recently vaccinated vulnerable older people that they were at higher risk for being infected during that period.”
WHO launch a team to investigate SARS-CoV-2 origin
Upon the back of new evidence, the US Secretary of State ,Mike Pompeo, demanded the WHO to launch an investigation into the possibility that the virus was a “accidental” lab leak.
On January 28, 2021, after 2 weeks of quarantine the WHO probe team begin their investigation in Wuhan, China tasked to learn the origins of SARS-CoV-2, this is a little over one year after the virus was discovered in humans.
Part of the investigation team is Peter Daszak from EcoHealth Alliance, whos organisation provides funding to the Wuhan lab for work on bat coronavirus research, a man who is clearly conflicted.
Shi Zhengli-Li who receives funding from EcoHealth Alliance and claimed no lab staff were infected, is the deputy director of the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The Wuhan lab deleted their data.
A cluster of COVID-19 case was found at the Huanan wet market, where bats were not sold, according to a paper sited by US officials in February 2020.
Lab origin is not ruled out!
CDC Director Walensky emails about “vaccine breakthroughs”
On January 30, 2021 (thanks to Freedom of information (FOIA)) the CDC’s Director, Dr Rochelle Walensky, sends an email titled “vaccine breakthroughs” – knowing that the COVID-19 vaccines are failing to prevent infection, and thus transmission, contrary to what the agency promoted to the public. [1, 2] Mandated vaccines were based on an alleged “community” benefit!
China: SARS-CoV-2 possibly circulating in parts of the world as early as Sept-Oct 2019
On February 2, 2021 China’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson Wang Wenbin “expressed the hope” that the US government would invite the World Health Organisation (WHO) experts to carry out novel coronavirus source tracing research in the United States. This follows the recent, January 28, 2021 launch by the WHO of a team to investigate the virus origins in China.
Wang noted the reason being that SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were found by the US CDC in blood donations collected that had been collected in December 2019, before the country’s first official case on Jan 21, 2020. There were allegedly “many clues, reports and studies” that indicate the virus had spread to many parts of the world as early as the second half of 2019.”
Additional intel to support Sep-Oct 2019 potential virus releases/escape/spread:
- The World Military Games were held in Wuhan, China October 2019,
- US Intel: China paper suggested Sept 2019 may have been the start
- Wuhan Institute of Virology delete their bat virus genetic sequence database on Sept 12, 2019
- China conducts a novel coronavirus simulation in Wuhan on Sept 18, 2019
- As early as Sept 3, 2019 SARS-CoV-2 antibodies found in blood samples in Italy
- Anonymous prediction on Sept 4, 2019 makes “prophetic” claim of “major event” coming
WHO: the vaccine may not stop transmission of SARS-CoV-2
On February 5, 2021 the WHO’s released their interim position paper and stated “there are still critical unknowns regarding the efficacy of vaccination in reducing transmission”, and that “people who are vaccinated should not be exempt from complying with other travel risk-reduction measures.” [1]
Current “scientific unknowns… concerning the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines”:
- efficacy in preventing disease
- ability of limiting transmission including for new variants
- duration of protection
- timing of booster doses
- whether vaccination offers protection against asymptomatic infection
- age and population groups that should be prioritized for vaccination
- how long before travel vaccines should be offered
- possible exemption of people who have antibodies against SARS-CoV-2
For vaccines that were sold as 95% effective (Pfizer), 94.1% effective (Moderna), 2 doses 90% effective (AstraZeneca) – But what does “effective” mean?
Japan approves first COVID-19 vaccine – Pfizer-BioNTech
Japan’s Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare gave the first “fast-track approval ” to Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine on Sunday February 14, 2021 in ages 16 years and older. Stated as “95 percent effective at preventing symptoms of COVID-19”. [1, 2]
On Wednesday February 17, 2021 it began rollout first with 40,000 healthcare workers who will receive two shots to be administered three weeks apart. “Of the initial group of health workers, 20,000 will participate in a study to track side effects potentially caused by the vaccine.”
“A further 3.7 million front-line health workers are to begin receiving the vaccine in March, followed by 36 million people aged 65 or older from April” 2021. ” People with pre-existing conditions such as diabetes or heart disease and those working at elderly care facilities will come next, and then finally the general population.”
- COVID-19 vaccinations began 6 months out from the start of the 2021 Tokyo Olympics and Paralympics
- In 2020 Japan had no excess death above expected.
- By April 21, 2021 – Japan PM discussed receiving 50 M additional Pfizer doses, on top of existing agreements for 144 M doses – total 194 M doses, enough for 97 M people.
- By May 2023 Japan’s CV19 vaccine dose orders totalled: Pfizer 194M, Moderna 100M, Oxford/AstraZeneca 120M, Novavax 150M, of that 564M total, 10.24M doses were donated to other countries. This includes booster shots. With Japan’s population in 2021 as 125.6M, the remaing doses equate to 4.4 shots for every single person.
TGA grants Provisional Registration for AstraZeneca COVID-19 Vaccine
On February 16, 2021 the Australian TGA grants Provisional Registration for the AstraZeneca COVID-19 Vaccine, the second gene-based vaccine approved for use in Australia.
COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca has provisional approval for the indication:
- Active immunisation of individuals ≥ 18 years old for the prevention of coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19) caused by SARS-CoV-2.
- The use of this vaccine should be in accordance with official recommendations.
- The decision has been made on the basis of short term efficacy and safety data. [Clinical Trial]
- Continued approval is dependent upon the evidence of longer-term efficacy and safety from ongoing clinical trials and post-market assessment.
“As a provisionally registered product, this medicine will remain in the Black Triangle Scheme for the duration of its provisional registration.”
The TGA made a safety assessment based on clinical trials that used a meningococcal vaccine (MenACWY) as a control, and not an inert, saline placebo.
“The world is engaged in the largest clinical trial, the largest global vaccination trial ever”
On February 21, 2021, in an ABC interview with David Speers, the Australian Health Minister, Greg Hunt noted, [1, 2]
“The world is engaged in the largest clinical trial, the largest global vaccination trial ever, and we will have enormous amounts of data.” said The Hon Greg Hunt MP [3]
Hunt also said:
“One of the things that is absolutely fundamental to confidence is the belief in safety. And the essence of safety is a full and thorough assessment. We know that from all of our research that in order to increase confidence, you need a strong belief in safety. “
This HERE is the Pfizer document FOIA assessment. Did Australia’s TGA do a “full and thorough assessment”?
How do you instil “belief”? explore controlling the narrative via censorship – HERE
COVID-19 vaccine roll-out begins in Australia
On February 22, 2021 together Australia’s Prime Minister, the Chief Medical Officer, and the Chief Nursing and Midwifery Officer, officially launched Australia’s COVID-19 vaccination program for groups at higher risk of death due to COVID-19.
FDA authorises higher storage and transport temp. for Pfizer vaccine
On February 25, 2021 in a press release the FDA authorised “alternative” storage and transport temperatures for Pfizer-BioNTech’s COVID-19 vaccine vials, to now allow the undiluted vials to be stored at “conventional temperatures commonly found in pharmaceutical freezers” for up to 2 weeks. This move makes the vaccine more widely available.
This follows Pfizer‘s Feb. 19 press release stating they have data to support higher temperatures, other than the sub-zero ( -80ºC to -60ºC (-112ºF to -76ºF)) that was required upon launch. These ultra-low temperatures, to keep the mRNA stable, caused transport and storage logistical issues, plus many vaccines were being thrown before used up as they fell outside of the usage guidelines.
Since November 2020, Moderna’s vaccine, which also uses mRNA technology, only required a normal freezer temperature of ” 2° to 8°C (36° to 46°F) for 30 days”.
Johnson & Johnson Vaccine receives US EUA, Australia rejects it’s use.
On February 27, 2021, following VRBPAC‘s green light, the US FDA granted the Johnson & Johnson (J&J) COVID-19 Vaccine Emergency Use Authorisation (EUA) for 18 years and older. To following day, Feb 28, the CDC’s ACIP committee voted unanimously to recommend the vaccine in the US population. [1]
The Janssen/J&J COVID-19 Vaccine is an adenovirus vector-based vaccine which carries the DNA code of a stabilized SARS-CoV-2 spike into the human cell. It is the first COVID-19 vaccine approved as a single dose.
In Australia, in early April it was announced that “Johnson & Johnson’s one-dose vaccine will not be part of Australia’s vaccine rollout…Health Minister Greg Hunt said that “similarities” to AstraZeneca’s vaccine “were the reason the federal government had decided against pursuing the option any further.” [1]
By April 2021 enough recipients of AstraZeneca’s vaccine was experiencing blood-clotting issues in the under 50 age group, to steer authorities to recommend Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine instead.
By May 5, 2022, the U.S. FDA limited the authorised use as the vaccine a is may cause “thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS) which may be life-threatening.”
Switzerland: 16 Elderly die following mRNA vaccine
At least 16 people in Switzerland, died after receiving Pfizer or Moderna COVID-19 vaccine.
“In 16 serious cases, the people concerned died at differing intervals after receiving the vaccine. Their average age was 86, and the majority of them had serious pre-existing conditions,” Swissmedic said in a statement.
“According to the agency, … fatalities had not been caused by the vaccination” – which given these are new technology “vaccines” and that the elderly weren’t part of the clinical trials, how can they be so sure? [1]
The Global Times found that major Western media outlets have been downplaying the deaths following the new vaccines.
Athletes began suddenly collapsing or dropping dead
From March 2021 young, healthy, fit healthy athletes across the world BEGAN collapsing or dying at RATES never recorded before in history. By February 5, 2022 that toll had reached 624 sudden deaths. [1] By mid 2021, various sports organisations made it a requirement for athletes to submit to the “emergency use” COVID-19 vaccines in order for them to participate in sports or receive pay, including school children. [2, 3, 4, 5]
By the end of 2021 the “fact checkers” assured the public that of their review of “publicly available information” of 19 athletes there is “no proof” of a causal relationship with the vaccine or whether they were vaccinated.
Good Sciencing is tracking the global collapse and death toll of athletes from public records – HERE
They reported studies done prior to 2020 showed average of 66 athlete deaths per year. Compare this to deaths vaccine mandate years:
- 2021 = 416
- 2022 = 791
- 2023 = 245
- The month of January 2022 = 97
Australia’s Biosecuirty Act extended
The human Biosecurity Emergency period under the Biosecurity Act (2015) was extended from 17 March 2021 for an additional three months until 17 June 2021, on the grounds that “the COVID-19 situation overseas continues to pose an unacceptable public health risk to Australia, including the emergence of more highly transmissible variants”.
More extensions >>>
US top-level officials colluded to cover-up myocarditis in teens following COVID-19 vaccination
It is now known through a Freedom of Information request (received ~Oct 18, 2023) that beginning March 2, 2021 that the CDC and top level Whitehouse and public health officials knew that the COVID-19 vaccines were associated with heart damage (myocarditis) and blood clotting. The emails from March 2, 2021, through May 28, 2021 reveal they colluded to produce an internal 17 page “Script” which formulated how to publicly cover up this startling finding. Especially to not connect the adverse events to “after vaccination”. [1, 2]
Dr Wolf reports that Admiral Rachel Levine, MD, Assistant Secretary for Health, HHS “seems to be running the show”, she reported that the American Association of Paediatricians were also in the loop, and (falsely) stated myocarditis “cases are infrequent and mild and seem to resolve without treatment”.
See MORE
TGA Access Consortium decide changing the “vaccine” mRNA code does not make it a new product!
On March 5, 2021 Australian TGA’s Access Consortium are considering changing the COVID-19 vaccine’s mRNA code during the pandemic, in a provisionally registered vaccine, and compare is to seasonal influenza vaccine changes, even though they are completely different technologies.
“On public health and scientific considerations, Regulatory Authorities do not consider an updated coronavirus vaccine to be an entirely novel product with the resulting requirement for lengthy full-blown clinical studies.”….”a regulatory approach like for seasonal updates for influenza vaccines can be taken”
“Since an updated vaccine variant will build on a previously authorised parent version with established quality, safety and efficacy; from a public health perspective, it may be justifiable to roll out the new vaccine candidate already in parallel with the previous version in absence of clinical immunogenicity and safety data while these studies are ongoing.”
It appears that since a “booster” has been granted TGA provisional approval, changing the mRNA code may not require much regulatory oversight!!! Yet a different protein could have profound cytotoxic implications.
It appears the regulatory agency is authorising the “vaccine platform” and not the “active ingredient” which mRNA code will force the body to manufacture. The body makes the “active ingredient”, that is unique for each vaccine, but apparently not according to the regulators.
Expert warns against mass COVID-19 vaccination
Geert Vanden Bossche, DMV, PhD, an independent virologist, vaccine expert and evolutionary biologist from Belgium sent a warning to the world against mass COVID-19 vaccination in the middle of a pandemic with the wrong type of vaccines. [1]
CDC adds the term “fully vaccinated”
On March 8, 2021 the CDC added the term “fully vaccinated” to their website specifically relating to COVID-19 vaccines, as being administered a dose of vaccine is no longer considered “vaccinated”.
“People are considered fully vaccinated:
- 2 weeks after their second dose in a 2-dose series, like the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines, or
- 2 weeks after a single-dose vaccine, like Johnson & Johnson’s Janssen vaccine
If it has been less than 2 weeks since your shot, or if you still need to get your second dose, you are NOT fully protected”
They also state “COVID-19 vaccines are effective at protecting you from getting sick [not protected from becoming infected or prevented from transmitting the virus]. Based on what we know about COVID-19 vaccines, people who have been fully vaccinated can start to do some things that they had stopped doing because of the pandemic.” “[But] keep taking precautions in public places like wearing a mask, staying 6 feet apart from others, and avoiding crowds and poorly ventilated spaces”
By January 5, 2022, when 3 monthly boosters caused confusion, “Fully Vaccinnated” speech was replaced with “Stay up to Date” with your vaccines!
Timeline pages:
1800s | 1900-1945 | 1946-1979 | 1980-1999 | 2000-2015 | 2016-2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023