Pre-Pandemic Timeline
2000 – 2015

Chronological order of significant global, Australian and SA data points leading up to the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Navigate the timeline pages:

1800s | 1900-1945 | 1946-1979 | 1980-1999 | You Are Here | 2016-2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023

Best viewed on a large screen

Data points are continuously being added so please come back again soon

2000
January 1 2000

Y2K – the worldwide digital apocalypse (that didn’t happen)

Leading up to January 1, 2000, people thought the world as we know it was going to end. Transportation, utilities, medical supplies and more were all controlled by computers, including nuclear power plants!  Up to this point, computers processed dates in two digits (i.e. 1980 = 80) in order to save memory space, so the year 2000 (Y2K), that would become 00, the exact same unit as 1900. It was assumed when the clock struck midnight, computers would fail, networks would crash and the world would plunge into riotous chaos – it didn’t! [1, 2, 3] Reports of the “millennial bug” had begun on September 11, 1996, [4], where software upgrades were needed.  “By early 1998, the alarm bells were in full ring, and all were in a Y2K frenzy.”  Governments around the world spent billions to “exterminate” the bug!  The US spent $100 billion on fixes, and $300 billion was spent world wide!
Microsoft, headed by Bill Gates at the time, produced computer software which was sold with nearly every personal computer (PC) around the world, it just so happened to be one of the major beneficiaries of the Y2K crisis. [5]
January 13 2000

Bill Gates steps down as Microsoft CEO, and launches the BMG Foundation

On January 13, 2000 Bill Gates announced he stepped down as Microsoft CEO, the company he cofounded in 1975, “to concentrate on software strategy”.  Gates’ personal wealth at the time was estimated at nearly $85 billion.

In 1999, during Microsoft’s monopolistic anti-trust legal proceedings, Bill Gates began to reposition his brand from computer geek to “philanthropist” by forming the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) [ARCHIVE] as a Non-Governmental Organisation (NGO) that “gives back to global communities through increasing access to innovations in education, technology, and world health”, with a strong focus on reproductive health. [5, 6]

The BMGF was officially stated to have launched in 2000.

January 20 2000

Biotechnology is still in it’s infancy

On January 20, 2000 President Bill Clinton officially declared National Biotechnology Month 2000 and in his speech he stated:

“Remarkable as its achievements have been, the biotechnology enterprise is still in its infancy. We will reap even greater benefits as long as we sustain the intellectual partnership and public confidence that have moved biotechnology forward thus far…

We must … provide Federal regulatory agencies with sufficient resources to maintain sound, science-based review and regulation of biotechnology products.”

He also stated:

“Today, a third of all new medicines in development are based on biotechnology.  Designed to attack the underlying cause of an illness, not just its symptoms…”

The next day, January 21, 2000, President Clinton launched the new National Nanotechnology Initiative. [1]

January 21 2000

Nanotechnology Revolution begins

On January 21, 2000 President Clinton launched the National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI), which will lead the “next industrial revolution”. [1]  In his speech he stated “imagine, materials with 10 times the strength of steel and only a fraction of the weight; shrinking all the information at the Library of Congress into a device the size of a sugar cube; detecting cancerous tumors that are only a few cells in size. Some of these research goals will take 20 or more years to achieve.” [1]

One billionth of a metre is a nanometre.

Getting to this point began with the Interagency Working Group on Nanoscience‘s (IWGN) first report in December 1998 called  Nanostructure Science and Technology – A Worldwide Study this provided a “basis for the Federal government to assess how to make strategic research and development (R&D) investments in this emerging field of nanotechnology”.

Then in September 1999 the IWGN Workshop Report, Nanotechnology Research Directions, was released with a “Vision for Nanotechnology Research and Development in the Next Decade”.  Nanotechnology will fundamentally change the way materials and devices will be produced in the future.

At this point, in the year 2000, most people didn’t know much about nanotechnology, there was only a small core of scientists and engineers. In recent years new breeds of microscopes made it possible to control the movement of atoms. [2]

The previous day, on January 20, 2000 President Clinton acknowledged National Biotechnology month.

Exactly 20 years later, to the day, the US reported their first SARS-CoV-2 patient, and the day before, China confirms human-to-human transmission.  The “coronavirus pandemic” allowed both bio-technology (mRNA) and nano-technology (lipid nanoparticles (LNP)) to converge into a new technology “vaccine” used for the first time and en-masse, on a large percentage of the worlds population.

January 31 2000

GAVI is launched

The Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation (GAVI) “movement” was officially launched January 31, 2000  at the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos, Switzerland.  GAVI headquarters are based in Geneva, Switzerland. The board of GAVI held their first meeting held on October 28, 1999 in New York. The World Health Organization is a founding partner of GAVI with its Director-General, Dr Brundtland chairing the GAVI Board for the first two years. [1, 5]

Nearly three million children worldwide still die needlessly each year of vaccine-preventable illnesses,” … “For only US $17 per child, we can provide lifetime protection against the six historical scourges – polio, diphtheria, tuberculosis, pertussis, measles and tetanus. And for not much more, we can extend the protection to include hepatitis B, yellow fever and Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib), the leading cause of pneumonia and meningitis.”
said Dr. Gro Harlem Brundtland , Director-General of the WHO and the chair of GAVI, and author of “Sustainable Development”

The Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization is a partnership dedicated to ensuring that all children, however poor, have equal access to these vaccines. The Alliance also works to spur the development of new vaccines against major killers that primarily affect the world’s poorest people [Start with poor, as always]. It is founded on the principle[belief] that immunization is a human right and a key step towards overcoming poverty [heart strings]. ” [vaccinealliance.org]

GAVI believed vaccines and immunization play a “crucial role… in world health and economic development”, with the objective of “working with government officials to make universal immunization an important national priority.”  The actively asked for contribution$ to the Global Fund for Children’s Vaccines, and advocated for school curricula to include immunization education.  Currently “the key barriers to universal childhood immunization are insufficient financing and inadequate vaccination infrastructure,” and awareness of the “value and cost-effectiveness of immunization with both new and old vaccines…”  This way “under-used vaccines” [and all the new ones to come] will have a market! [Launch brochure 4]

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation‘s initial five-year pledge of US$753 million in 1999 provided the seed money to launch (GAVI), now referred to as Gavi The Vaccine Alliance.  It is a partnership with the global vaccine makers, Rockefeller Foundation, United Nations bodies all to help save lives through vaccination in the world’s poorest countries. [2, 3]

Gavi “not only pays for the vaccines, but also spurs their development and expanded production…the Vaccine Alliance’s business model influences the market for vaccines.”

Gavi is a public-private partnership with the Gates Foundation, WHO, UNICEF and the World Bank and others. Gavi is funded through an assortment of government pledges, the Gates Foundation and private sector donors.  Their funding model draws heavily on the private sector, especially vaccine manufactures.  Gavi is ran by a board of representatives.

Australia pledges yearly contributions to Gavi, in 2013 representing 2.3% of funds.

Gavi has changed it’s legal name and structure as it has evolved:

  • 2000 > The Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunizations
  • 2006 > The GAVI Alliance
  • 2014 > GAVI, The Vaccine Alliance

Since 23 June 2009,  when Gavi restructured it’s focus and separated from UNICEF, it has had total immunity from investigation or audit, meaning it is not accountable for it’s global influence, actions and decisions.  Also Gavi does not pay taxes. [@57min]

March 13 2000

Earth Charter: the transition document to sustainable development

The idea of the Earth Charter originated in 1987 from the recommendations in “Our Common Future” document, when the United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development called for a new charter to guide the transition to sustainable development. [1]

The drafting of the Earth Charter text was done during a six-year worldwide consultation process (1994-2000), overseen by the independent Earth Charter Commission, which was convened by Martin Strong and Mikhail Gorbachev with the purpose of developing a global consensus on values and principles for a sustainable future. It was approved at a meeting at the UNESCO headquarters in Paris in March 12-14, 2000, it contains a preamble, 16 main principles, sixty-one supporting principles, and a conclusion entitled “The Way Forward.” [5]

The document was justified as a “five year review of the implementation of Agenda 21 demonstrated, so far the world has failed to take the new course towards sustainable development.”

The Preamble affirms that “we are one human family and one Earth community with a common destiny,” and the Earth Charter encourages all people to recognize their shared responsibility, each according to his or her situation and capacity, for the well-being of the whole human family, the greater community of life, and future generations. [2, 3]

“The Earth Charter Commission member who presided over the unveiling just happened to be none other than Steven C. Rockefeller.” [4]

April 8 2000

Hybrid organisms are now considered part of phylogenetic nomenclature

By April 8, 2000 the International Society for Phylogenetic Nomenclature committee published their “first draft” of the new “PhyloCode: A Phylogenetic Code of Biological Nomenclature” as they deemed the current Linnaean system unable to accomodated “clades“.  The new PhyloCode included a provision for “Hybrids“.  This lays out the rules which taxonomists use to classify organisms, which now includes gene manipulated, chimeric organisms. [1, 2]

By definition a “hybrid formula” is “An expression consisting of the names of two taxa separated by a multiplication sign, designating a single organism or set of organisms of hybrid origin.” [3, 4]

If part of a virus genome (via mRNA vaccine) incorporates (transfects) into the human genome, does that make that human a hybrid?

September 1 2000

FDA’s CBER begins to regulate Gene Therapy products

In September 2000 FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) began to regulate the emerging market of human gene therapy products, which fall under the legal definition of a “biologic”.

Gene therapy research was 10 years old by this date.  The first clinical trial of a genetic therapy occurred on September 14, 1990, on a 4-year-old girl named Ashanthi DeSilva. She survived.  But then in September 1999, 18 year old Jesse Gelsinger died from a reaction to his experimental gene therapy treatment, which spurred and investigation that revealed not all trial adverse events were being reported. [1, 2]

It was reported that that since 1989 to September 2000, the FDA had “received about 300 requests from medical researchers and manufacturers to study gene therapy and to develop gene therapy products”, looking to find cures for genetic diseases. [3, 4]

September 1 2000

Brighton Collaboration is launched – thier purpose to define vaccine injuries

Around September 2000 (Fall) the Brighton Collaboration (BC) was officially launched, following a 1999 vaccine conference in Brighton, England, where US CDC’s Robert Chen and others called for “improving the quality of vaccine safety data”. [10]

Their initial stated mission “is an international voluntary collaboration to facilitate the development, evaluation, and dissemination of high quality information about the safety of human vaccines.” with a primary aim “[t]o develop globally accepted and implemented standardized case definitions of Adverse Events Following Immunization” (AEFI) i.e. vaccine injury.

“The Collaboration consists of researchers and other professionals from vaccine safety, public health, pharmaceutical and regulatory agencies to address the problems of the quality of information on vaccine safety. Its primary task is the harmonization and standardization of AEFI’s”. [3, 11]

The CDC and WHO got involved in the 2000 launch, and by 2001 the “Brighton Method for defining adverse events following immunization was established” and on May 22, 2002 they held their first International Symposium on the Evaluation of Safety of Human Vaccines. [1, 2]

In December 2003 the finalised formation of the Brighton Collaboration Foundation, was announced.  It is a “independent, not-for-profit organization, under the direct supervision of the Swiss government. It can accept funding and responsibly create strategies that help donors and The Brighton Collaboration scientists achieve their common goals”. [5]

By 2004 the first scientific publications of the BC included the “first six case definitions of adverse events following immunisation”. Curiously in 2003 they had a working group looking at “Idiopathic Thrombocytopenia”.  [Note in April 2021 Robert Chen, now the Scientific Director, and is defining Thrombosis with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome (TTS) [6]

In 2005 the United Nations recommends the “Brighton Collaboration case definitions and guidelines” and in 2007 they are recommended by the FDA then the EMA in 2008. [4]

In 2011 the BC partnered with the WHO to develop the Vaccine Safety Blueprint.  In 2013 templates for documenting the safety of Viral Vector Vaccines were created, the same year the “Brighton Collaboration Online Journal Club formalised to promote open and transparent scientific debate of current issues in vaccine safety.”

On May 21, 2019 the Brighton Collaboration is dissolved as a partnership under Swiss law and reconstituted as a programme of the Task Force for Global Health, a not-for-profit NGO that began in 1984 [11, 12].  The Swiss Brighton Collaboration Foundation remains. BC now operate out of Atlanta, where they’ve always had an office, but it is claimed The move to the Task Force for Global Health is “to help increase efficiency and meet the increasing social demand for information about vaccine safety”.  [7, 8, 9]

On May 28, 2019 CEPI in partner with the BC launched the Safety Platform for Emergency vACcines (SPEAC) Project to “help assess the safety of various CEPI-funded vaccine candidates undergoing clinical trials” – just in time for the COVID-19 vaccines.

In 2020 the “World Health Organization (WHO) Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety (GACVS) recommended that “any review of the safety of new vaccines be based on the appropriate Brighton Collaboration standardized templates for benefit–risk assessment of vaccines (by technology platforms) when available and approved, which offer a structured approach to evaluating safety””,

September 8 2000

UN Millennium Development Goals are declared

The United Nations Millennium Declaration was signed on September 8, 2000 by all 191 UN member states, agreeing to try to achieve Eight Millennium Development Goals (MDG) by the end of the year 2015. [1, 2]

The Eight Millennium Development Goals were to:

  1. eradicate extreme poverty and hunger;
  2. achieve universal primary education;
  3. promote gender equality and empower women;
  4. reduce child mortality;
  5. improve maternal health;
  6. combat HIV/AIDS, malaria, and other diseases;
  7. ensure environmental sustainability; and
  8. develop a global partnership for development.

“The MDGs are inter-dependent; all the MDG influence health, and health influences all the MDGs”.

UN released an assessment report in 2012 which revealed “the poorest and those disadvantaged because of gender, age, disability or ethnicity are often bypassed.” The follow up UN agenda for 2030 focus not only on edadicating “extreme poverty” which it didn’t achive, but to eradicate ALL poverty.

2001
June 1 2001

NORAD terrorist simulation featuring Osama Bin Ladin

On June 1-2, 2001 NORAD sponsored a multi-agency, joint taskforce, counter-terrorist and field training exercise called Operation Amalgam Virgo which was a hypothetical scenario of a cruise missile or an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) being launched by a terrorist group.  The advertising for this simulation had Osama Bin Ladin on the cover! [1, 2, 3]

Fast forward 102 days and New York experienced a terrorist attack where air craft crashed into the two Rockefeller built world trade center buildings which pan-caked on their footings and a third building, #7, mysteriously also pan-caked on it’s footings without being hit by any weapon. Osama Bin Ladin is accused of being the terrorist instigator, and the attack lasted 102 minutes.

On October 18, 2019 the Event 201 coronavirus pandemic simulation was held, then 104 days later a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) was declared by the WHO and 145 days later a pandemic was declared. (Were they 2 days late, and what’s the meaning of the “201” if not the reverse of 102? Just asking for a friend.)

June 22 2001

Dark Winter – Smallpox Bioterrorism Exercise

The Dark Winter [7] bio-terroism exercise was held at Andrews Air Force Base in Washington, DC, on June 22-23, 2001.  The exercise portrayed a fictional scenario designed to simulate possible US reaction to the deliberate introduction of smallpox in three states during the winter of 2002.  It was supported by the Johns Hopkins Center for Civilian Biodefense Studies together with the Oklahoma City National Memorial Institute for Prevention Terrorism, the Center for Strategic and International Studies and the ANSER Institute for Homeland Security. [1, 2, 3, 5]

Health and Human Services assistant secretary for preparedness and response, Robert Kadlec, participated in the script writing and came up with the name Dark Winter, a reference to the outcome with a lack of vaccines. [4]

In the scenario, the “participants in Dark Winter, representing the National Security Council, quickly deduce that smallpox has been deliberately introduced and that this is the result of a “bioterrorist attack on the United States.” The assumption is made that the attack is “related to decisions we may make to deploy troops to the Mid-East.” – remember this is prior to 9/11! [6]

As part of the scenario, “mainstream media outlets…were sent anonymous letters that threatened renewed attacks on the U.S., including anthrax attacks, if the U.S. did not withdraw its troops from the Middle East.”

“[T]he operation showed how quickly a public health disaster could lead to widespread chaos and social collapse.”

September 11 2001

9/11 Twin Tower terrorist attack

Two hijacked commercial aircraft crashed into each of the World Trade Center twin towers in New York city, and another into the Pentagon building. On that day 3 building in New York, the twin towers and World Trade Center 7 all “pancaked” down onto their foundations, the latter was not hit by any aircraft! Chances?. [1]

This event triggered an enormous US effort to combat terrorism, a “threat” that from this point on, became real in the minds of the global community.

“The crises of 2001 led to a cultural shift in how public health, emergency management, and medical experts think about national security….Health departments became accepted as important partners by traditional emergency management.” [2]

September 17 2001

Anthrax bioterrorism attack in the US

On September 18, 2001, just days after the September 11 terrorist attack, anonymous letters laced with bacterial spores of Bacillus anthracis aka Anthrax, were mailed to media companies and congressional offices. The “anthrax letters killed five people and sickened 17”.  This type of bioterrorism attack was simulated just months before in June 2001, and game-played using letters – it was called Dark Winter.

The crime was investigated by the FBI et al for 7 years and on February 19, 2010 concluded that Dr. Bruce E. Ivins who worked at the at the United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID), worked alone and sent the letters.  In July 2008, Ivins was reported to have committed suicide. [1, 2, 3, 4]

Following this threat, the Clinton administration’s military were mandated to receive anthrax vaccines, to “protect troops against the use of anthrax as a biological weapon”, a practice which just months before in June 2001 the Department of Defense had halted! [5]

In 2003 Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ordered the 6-shot non-FDA approved, mandated anthrax vaccines to stop.  Many soldiers were injured by the vaccines, 85% of troops had reported some adverse reaction to the vaccine, this vaccination practice could explain the 1990’s Gulf War syndrome which had an alleged unknown cause! [10]  The CDC started recommending the shots in 1991, the vaccine was only FDA approved in 2005, some military refused to take it. [6, 7, 8, 9]

 

October 10 2001

Global Health Security Initiative established

The Global Health Security Initiative (GHSI) originated at the international symposium of the Commonwealth Fund in Washington, D.C. on October 10, 2001, under the leadership of former U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Tommy G. Thompson.

The mailing of anthrax-laced letters just 1 month after the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, in the United States (FBI), highlighted several inadequacies in U.S. and international preparedness and response to biological threats.  It was now deemed necessary to establish a regular, formal opportunity for the Health Ministers of the major industrialized nations and the WHO to meet and exchange ideas on health security and bioterrorism, whether the biological threats is naturally occurring, accidental, or intentionally-released. [1, 2]

The first meeting was held on November 7, 2001 in Ottawa, Canada.

October 26 2001

The Patriot Act becomes law

Just 45 days following the 9/11 terrorist attack, the Bush administration’s USA Patriot Act draft legislation was signed into law on October 26, 2001, “a law that significantly expanded the search and surveillance powers of federal law-enforcement and intelligence agencies.” [1, 2]

The 300 page document was ready to go so fast because Senator Joe Biden had written it in 1994 as the “Omnibus Counterterrorism Act of 1995” following the Oklahoma bombing, but it had been rejected up til then. [3, 4]

December 11 2001

China joins the World Trade Organisation

China “a developing country” became the 143rd World Trade Organisation (WTO) member December 11, 2001. It ” began to work towards joining the WTO from July 10, 1986, from which time it entered into negotiations with General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) on the “resumption of its status as a contracting party to GATT”.  [1, 2, 3]

In 1986 the Chinese Government expected to “receive treatment equivalent to that accorded to other developing contracting parties”.  President Bill Clinton, is said to have been  “a major proponent of China’s bid”.

2002
April 19 2002

Gain of Function Patent submitted for Coronavirus – mRNA vaccine model

On April 19, 2022 a patent application was filed by Ralph Baric et al, of University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill called “Methods for Producing Recombinant Coronavirus” which stated a method for producing an “infectious, replication defective coronavirus” called a nidovirus.  This engineered modification to the “common cold” coronavirus made it more pathogenic to humans, and thus is a gain of function manipulation potentially weaponising a virus. This work was funded by NIAID head by Dr Anthony Fauci.

This patent forms the basis for the mRNA vaccine model. “For vaccine purposes, these data indicate that robust gene order rearranged Coronaviruses can be assembled and used as safe heterologous vaccines in swine and other vertebrate

A few months later the SARS virus “emerged” in China, creating a brand new disease!

June 12 2002

The Bioterrorism Act becomes law

In the wake of 9/11 and the anthrax attacks, the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response bill was introduced to parliament on December 11, 2001 and became law on June 12, 2002 and became known as the Bioterrorism Act.

As stated the act is to “improve the ability of the United States to prevent, prepare for, and respond to bioterrorism and other public health emergencies.”

Amongst other things the Bioterrorism Act “addressed the accelerated approval of priority Medical Counter Measures (MCM) and the development of a final rule on using animal models [1] for when human efficacy studies are not feasible or ethical.” The Act established the Strategic National Stockpile (SNS) of vaccines and other MCM.

October 1 2002

Declaration of Taipei

The Declaration of Taipei was first adopted a 53rd WMA General Assembly, Washington, DC, USA, October 2002.

Research has been evolving since the Declaration of Helsinki was adopted in 1964. Large collections of data and human specimens allow for the development of new research strategies, modelling and predictive analysis in the age of technology.

To balance the very powerful tool for increasing knowledge with the dangers of abuse and misuse of such data from commercial, administrative or political areas the Declaration of Taipei was born in 2002 and updated in 2016.

November 1 2002

Ralph Baric et al create a synthetic coronavirus in a US lab

On November 1, 2002 University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill (UNC) researcher Ralph Baric et al publishes a peer reviewed paper considered a “breakthrough work” in gain-of-function research which describes “the creation of a synthetic clone of a natural mouse coronavirus.” [1] The paper was received for review in January 31, 2002.

“In essence, the authors have “translated” the RNA virus into the language of DNA (using reverse transcriptase), which enabled them to manipulate its genome with the help of existing genetic engineering tools.” [2]

Then the first SARS coronavirus disease broke out in China a few weeks later.

2003
January 1 2003

Coronaviruses become a “global concern”

Coronaviruses have received global public health concern since 2003,

  • after an outbreak caused by SARS-CoV (SARS) emerged in China.
  • Later on, in 2012, the Middle-East respiratory syndrome (MERS) spread in Saudi Arabia, caused by MERS-CoV.
  • In 2020 the COVID-19 outbreak starts in Wuhan, China caused by SARS-CoV-2 virus resulting in the WHO declaring a pandemic.

All of these human coronaviruses belongs to the genus betacoronaviruses (β-CoVs) which are said to have the “ability to genetically evolve inside the host body and then in the intermediate putative host, which is, in turn, the suitable media to jump towards humans.”

“Since 1960, 30% of respiratory illnesses were caused by the pneumotropic coronaviruses…and were deemed to be nonfatal, until [Nov] 2002” when SARS “appeared in Guangdong province, China.”

Coronaviruses are the most recombinogenic and mutative known viruses [1, 2, 3].  It is known that RNA “produce large numbers of progeny” which is likely “the key to their evolutionary survival”…buffering them from “deleterious mutations” and allowing “advantageous mutations” to continue on. [4]

A comment by an Irish laboratory expert in June 2020, warned that now a “pattern” of 3 viruses of this kind have “emerged” expect “these viruses…to cross species boundaries again” in the future.  A precedent for the push for a “pan coronavirus vaccine” which Peter Dazak “prophesied” in 2016.

January 1 2003

WHO: Vaccine Safety Net Project established

The Vaccine Safety Net Project is a WHO initiative established in 2003 for helping to control vaccine safety information on websites, giving approval to those who “adhere to good information practices”. [1]

The Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety (GACVS) assesses submitted web content before an organisation can become a VSN member.

According to the WHO “vaccine safety issues are the responsibility of those who provide the vaccines as well as those who develop or manufacture the products.”  This is where the Global Vaccine Safety Initiative (GVSI) closely recognises the close collaboration “between regulators and industry” to monitor vaccine safety data.

January 26 2003

Bill Gates Launches FNIH Grand Challenges initiative

At the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, in January 26, 2003, Bill Gates announced a $200 million grant to establish the Grand Challenges in Global Health initiative, an effort in partnership with the non-profit Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Inc. (FNIH).  “The initiative will identify critical scientific challenges in global health and increase research on diseases that cause millions of deaths in the developing world.” [1, 2, 3, 6]

“The initiative will identify critical scientific challenges in global health and increase research on diseases that cause millions of deaths in the developing world.” The initiative is managed by the “global health experts at the FNIH, the BMGF, the CIHR, and the Wellcome Trust”

On the Scientific Board is Dr Anthony Fauci and a BMGF representative, who are “charged with identifying specific scientific or technological innovations that are likely to:

  • Have a global impact
  • Show high potential for feasibility
  • Potentially remove a critical barrier to solving health problems”

In 2007, the Gates Foundation launched Grand Challenges Explorations,small scale funding initiative to “engage more of the world’s innovators more quickly.” [4]

The initiative was relaunched on October 7, 2014 as the Global Grand Challenges, to expand to “a family of initiatives fostering innovation to solve key global health and development problems” [5]

March 11 2003

Project BioShield to incentivise private industry

On March 11, 2003 Project BioShield bill was introduced to US congress, Dr Fauci testified on April 4, 2003 and the legislation became public law July 21, 2004. [Curiously 2020 pandemic was declared  exactly 17 years later on March 11!]

The Project BioShield Act of 2003 was established “to help incentivize private industry to develop vitally needed medical countermeasures by providing multi-year funding to support advanced research, clinical development, manufacture and procurement” othewise to “speed production of vaccines and other countermeasures in case of biological or other terrorist attacks.”

The federal bioterrorism budget went from [about] $305 million in 2001 to $3.8 billion for 2004, down from $5.9 billion in 2003.  HHS staff assigned to bioterrorism increased from 212 in 2001, to 1,700 in 2004. [1]

March 15 2003

The SARS epidemic declared in China

Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is a viral respiratory illness caused by a coronavirus, called SARS-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV) [10]. According to the CDC, SARS began in February 2003, it wasn’t until March that the WHO backdated it til the “end of February 2003.   According to WHO February 2003 Weekly Epidemiological Reports (WERs) [12] they mention reports of atypical pheumonia in China but Chinese officials designated the cause as chlamydia pneumoniae, which was found in 2 patients who died. [11]

WHO records from November 2002 to February 2003 reveal people in the southern Chinese province of Guangdong started to become ill from atypical pneumonia, China played down the illness. [1, 2, 3, 4]

On March 16, 2003 the WHO had released their website with the Case Definition as reported, the first recognized case was from Hanoi, Vietnam dated mid-February – not China.   At a March 25, 2003 WHO press conference it was claimed they were 10 days into an outbreak, making the official start of the SARS outbreak on March 15, 2003.

A novel coronavirus was discovered through complete viral genome sequence  and was characterised as SARS-CoV and published by May 30, 2003.

The illness spread to more than two dozen countries in North America, South America, Europe, and Asia before the SARS global outbreak of 2003 was contained

Contact with a doctor from China is said to have “seeded” the SARS pandemic with a 10% mortality rate.  The virus origin is unknown. [9]

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), a total of 8,098 people worldwide became sick with SARS during the 2003 outbreak. Of these, 774 died.  The US had 8 confirmed infections.  [5, 6, 7, 8] Since 2004, there has been no known SARS transmission anywhere in the world.  

Dr David Martin, stated that the WHO declared SARS eradicated in 2008, but I was unable to find a reference, though interestingly in October 2019 the question about SARS eradication was asked.

Coronaviruses were mostly known for causing common colds. “The SARS outbreak was a game changer,” says Linfa Wang, formally of CSIRO Australia, it caused coronaviruses to now receive global “public health” attention and research funding.

SARS timeline >>>

March 20 2003

Iraq War begins because of “Weapons of Mass Destruction” – which was fake news

On May 20, 2003 the United States (Bush) led a coalition that launched a fully-fledged invasion of Iraq, closely supported by the United Kingdom (Blair), the reason  was “built on three basic premises: that the regime of Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction (WMD); that it was developing more of them to the potential advantage of “terrorist” groups; and that creating a “friendly and democratic” Iraq would set an example for the region.” [1]

They multinational force were “ultimately unable to find substantial evidence that Hussein had an active weapons development programme”.  The chemical and biological, and potential nuclear WMD idea was pushed by “trusted media” and was manufactured fake news.  “[J]ournalists had betrayed the public by not doing their job and by accepting and amplifying and echoing the lies of Bush and his gang [official sources], instead of challenging them and exposing them.”  Had the “media exposed the lies, up to a million people might be alive today.”

A consequence “biosecuity” and “bioterrorism” policies were passed into law following this purported “threat”.

Did the Trusted News Initiative deceive the public again in the 2020 pandemic response?  Compared to some public funded media.

April 14 2003

Human Genome Project concludes – thus begins the Genomic Age

On April 14, 2003, UC Santa Cruz, as leaders of the Human Genome Project announced the project’s successful completion at a press conference and made the completed reference sequence of the human genome chromosomes publicly available on their Genome Browser to be used daily by thousands of biomedical researchers throughout the world to help usher in the Genomic Age.

The “finished” reference sequence covers about 99 percent of the gene-containing regions in the genome, and has been sequenced to an accuracy of 99.99 percent. “The missing portions can’t be reliably sequenced using current technology”, and are regions for continued exploration.

The genome sequencing endeavour was conceived in June 1985 at UCSC and was launched in 1990, through funding from the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Department of Energy (DOE) and concluded April 2003. [7, 8, 14]  “The DOE had become interested in studying the human genome as a way of aiding the detection of mutations that nuclear radiation might cause.” [15]

The Human Genome Project (HGP) was a collaborative effort of the International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium  who set out in a research program with a goal to completely map all the genes in the human genome by sequencing the 3 billion DNA “letters” and identify all protein coding genes.

“DNA is the genetic code that we all carry in our cells. The code is made up of the four chemical letters A, T, C and G. These letters are called bases and form the genetic code in all living things from plant to animal, bacteria to human. However, variation in the order of the bases is crucial to the differences both between and within species” [9]

The “Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome” was released in 2001, which estimated there to be “about 30,000–40,000 protein-coding genes in the human genome—only about twice as many as in worm or fly.”

In February 2001 a “draft sequence of the human genome” was released, where they stated “there appears to be about 30,000–40,000 protein-coding genes in the human genome—only about twice as many as in worm or fly”, far fewer than the ~100,000 previously estimated.  By 2004 that number reduced to 20,000-25,000, around the same as a round worm, though this may be as low as 19,000 genes. [11, 12, 13]

Of the human genes only 3% code for proteins and 97% has been termed “junk DNA” by scientist’s over the years. In 2002 it was determined that 99% of mouse genes have “direct counter parts to humans.” [3, 4, 5]

The field of Systems Biology came out of the Genome Project, realising that complexity of a species does not come from the number of it’s parts (genes), it’s more complex, with interacting sub-systems and feedback loops.  A normal functioning human body expresses (up-regulates) genes when required, triggered by many factors; thus emerged the field of study is known as epigenetics. [2, 6, 10]

Out of the Genome Project, scientists then “went to work to find the specific genes that cause certain illnesses and traits, so that gene-based therapies could be created.” [1]


The model of the immune system that vaccination is based upon, is out of date. The new model of the immune system is more complex than the 1950’s Innate-Adaptive model.  It’s show that pathogens turn-on epigenetic of which there are natural feedback systems in our bodies that modulate immune responses.  The protection granted to us by our immune system is more that the production of antibodies, that vaccine focus on measuring.

May 22 2003

WHO endorsed NGO FIND is launched – a new era in Diagnostics (Dx) begins

On May 22, 2003 at the WHO WHA the Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND) was created. FIND is an independent, non-profit research foundation based in Geneva, launched by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) and the UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR), and a Global Alliance for TB Drug Development (TB Alliance) Stakeholder. With initial funding of $30 million over 5 years by the BMGF, FIND is the only NGO dedicated solely to the development of diagnostic tests for infectious diseases. [1, 2, 3]

The creation of FIND was sold as a means to “develop better diagnostic tests for infectious diseases, with an initial emphasis on tuberculosis” as “TB is still diagnosed with century-old technology, by examining a patient’s sputum under a microscope”. The foundation’s first exccutive director was Dr. Giorgio Roscigno and Dr. Mark Perkins as the scientific director. [4]

FIND because diagnosis matters“[T]here is an urgent and unmet need for more accurate and cost-effective diagnostic technologies, particularly for diseases devastating the developing world.” The initiative will enable the “development and delivery of much-needed diagnostic tests for poverty-related diseases”.  Innovations in biotechnology and modern science could transform both the diagnosis and treatment of diseases, especially in the world’s poorest countries.

FIND will be “governed by a board composed of public health experts, business leaders, influential scientists and patient representatives. Working with specialised agencies, academia and civil society, FIND’s non-profit status will also enable close partnerships with industry to target investment toward promising diagnostics best suited to meet public health needs.

And so begins the new era of Diagnositics (Dx)

October 16 2003

International Declaration on Human Genetic Data (2003)

The International Declaration on Human Genetic Data (2003) was adopted unanimously and by acclamation at the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization’s (UNESCO) 32nd General Conference on 16 October 2003.  This document began several years before the Human Genome Project drew to an end. [1, 2]

With the rapidly developing field of genomic research and increasing speed with which to sequence genomes, many people fear that human genetic data will be used for purposes contrary to human rights and freedom. Governments, non-governmental organizations, the intellectual community and society in general are calling for guidelines at the international level.

This Declaration and the Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights (1997) are the only international points of reference in the field of biological-ethics.

November 21 2003

Australian Biosecuirty CRC for Emerging Infectious Disease is founded

On November 21, 2003 the University of Queensland launched the Australian Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre (AB-CRC) for Emerging Infectious Disease following the award of a 7-year federal government grant of $60 million to a consortium. It consisted of 3 universities, 8 federal and state government agencies, 5 industry groups and 3 international organisations (Bangkok, New York and Winnipeg). [1, 2, 3, 4]

The intent is for the partners to combine their resources and expertise using the latest diagnostic, computer and satellite technologies to develop specialised early warning systems for the rapid detection and response to disease outbreaks.

The spread of new infectious diseases into Australia, through the movement of people and animals, viruses jumping from animals to humans, or even bioterrorism, is an increasing risk according to Dr Stephen Prowse the CEO

The global SARS epidemic is a perfect example of the far-reaching impacts of newly emerging diseases” Dr Prowse said.

Experts in  AB-CRC, including Dr Hume Field and Professor John Mackenzie who were involved in the global response to the SARS outbreak, under the auspices of the World Health Organization. [3]

Prof Mackenzie was on the WHO Emergency Committee in 2020, and both were authors on The Lancet statement organised by Peter Daszak whom they worked closely with via the New Yorks Conservation Medicine, an arm of EcoHealth Alliance.

December 20 2003

Australia & NZ sign treaty to establish a bi-national therapeutic product Regulator

In December 20, 2003 the Australian and New Zealand Governments signed a treaty to establish a single, bi-national agency to regulate therapeutic products, including medical devices and prescription, over-the-counter and complementary medicines, as part of “Globalisation and the way “Towards a harmonised regulatory pathway”. [2, 3, 4]

Harmonisation of therapeutic products regulation is a relatively recent development, but there are ongoing activities at both the global and regional levels, as well as numerous formal and informal bilateral arrangements. For example, a number of states have chosen to recognise approvals by the United States FDA, either de jure, through a formal agreement, or de facto“.

“The single agency, which will replace the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) and the New Zealand Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Authority (Medsafe), will be accountable to both the Australian and New Zealand Governments. It is expected that the same regulation in force in Australia will also apply to New Zealand as per the amended law.” [1]

If the bi-national regulator is “implemented, the joint agency could serve as a model that would usefully inform initiatives in other jurisdictions”.  On January 12, 2012 the “Australia New Zealand Therapeutic Products Agency (ANZTPA)” had their “first meeting” following June 20, 2011 agreement to proceed, and completed a “harmonisation activity”.  But on November 20, 2014 the Oceania Regulator ANZTPA was officially scrapped. [5]

Harmonisation is still alive. The FDA is a founding member of International Conference on Harmonisation, on March 26, 2020 encouraged the “pharmaceutical regulatory authorities globally” to implement the ICH Guidelines to achieve International Regulatory Harmonization.

 

2004
February 4 2004

Facebook begins

Facebook was founded by Mark Zuckerberg and launched on February 4, 2004.   The platform began exclusively for US college students, once the “trend” was established, they opened up the platform to the wider public, globally.  This social media platform allows people around the world to voluntarily provide a wealth of their personal information including facial photos, voice and listening (microphone & camera), text, location data, habits, family and social relationships, interests and education and so much more.

Curiously the same day Facebook was launched the 2003 DARPA/Pentegon project Lifelog was shut down due to a “change in priorities”. [1, 2, 3]

Lifelog was an “ambitious effort to build a database tracking a person’s entire existence” that had referenced Microsoft’s MyLifeBits project. A government tracking it’s citizens is illegal without a warrant.

Ex-DARPA employees such as Regina Dugan went across to work for Facebook.  It is heavily involved in “cutting-edge experiments and hardware” research projects. [4, 5, 6]

Facebook now has the power to surveil, track, influence and censor citizens of the world not just internally, and via granting unauthorised access to user data through data-sharing deals with hundreds of external companies.  Why won’t China allow Facebook?

Zuckerberg is married to his Chinese “college sweetheart”, Priscilla Chan, together they formed their influential, philanthropic Chan-Zuckerberg Foundation.

Do Big Tech companies like Facebook, Google and Twitter function as publicly acceptable fronts for domestic (illegal) spying/data collection operations?

August 31 2004

Vaccine Safety Net project is launched

The World Health Organisation (WHO) Vaccine Safety Net Project (VSN) officially launched in August 31, 2004 and was communicated to the media on May 10, 2005.  The aim to improve global dissemination, via the internet [6], of information on vaccine safety that adheres to good information practices – linking to trusted sources of vaccine information.  The Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety (GACVS) [1] who “was constituted by WHO in September 1999″, to respond promptly, efficiently, and with scientific rigour to vaccine safety issues of potential global importance,” [2] this committee determines who is a good source of vaccine info. [3]

The Vaccine Safety Net is a global network of websites, evaluated by the WHO advisory committee, that provide reliable information on vaccine safety”. WHO evaluates the electronic resources (websites) for their adherence to the criteria of credibility, content, accessibility and design. [4]

The trusted websites included private, non-profits like Immunization Action Coalition (IAC) [5] who is affiliated with Bill Gates’ Children’s Vaccine Program (CVP) who together are the Allied Vaccine Group (AVG).

September 29 2004

Symposium sets the One World, One Health concept for disease prevention

Health experts from around the world met on September 29, 2004 for a symposium focused on the current and potential movements of diseases among human, domestic animal, and wildlife populations organized by the Wildlife Conservation Society and hosted by The Rockefeller University in New York City. The symposium called “One World, One Health: Building Interdisciplinary Bridges to Health in a Globalized World”.

The symposium set 12 priorities to combat health threats to human and animal health. These priorities, known as the “Manhattan Principles,” called for an international, interdisciplinary approach to prevent disease and formed the basis of the “One Health, One World™” concept.

Recent outbreaks of West Nile Virus, Ebola Hemorrhagic Fever, SARS, Monkeypox, Mad Cow Disease and Avian Influenza remind us that human and animal health are intimately connected.

A broader understanding of health and disease demands a unity of approach achievable only through a consilience of human, domestic animal and wildlife health – One Health.

We are in an era of “One World, One Health” and we must devise adaptive, forward-looking and multidisciplinary solutions to the challenges that undoubtedly lie ahead.

September 29 2004

WCS: One World, One Health Symposium

On September 29, 2004 a “One World, One Healthsymposium organized by the Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) [3, 4] was held at The Rockefeller University, and was followed by many other workshops, to bring into plan One Health.

Health experts “focused on the current and potential movements of diseases among human, domestic animal, and wildlife populations.” They state “A broader understanding of health and disease demands a unity of approach achievable only through a consilience of human, domestic animal and wildlife health” what they call One Health. [1]

“Phenomena such as species loss, habitat degradation, pollution, invasive alien species, and global climate change are fundamentally altering life on our planet from terrestrial wilderness and ocean depths to the most densely populated cities. The rise of emerging and resurging infectious diseases threatens not only humans (and their food supplies and economies), but also the fauna and flora comprising the critically needed biodiversity that supports the living infrastructure of our world”

William H. Foege, a Fellow at the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation gave the Keynote Speech:  “One World, One Health, Could We Muddle Through?” and Dr. Steven Sanderson, a Political Scientist [7] who was President & Chief Executive Officer of the Wildlife Conservation Society in Bronx, NY, Introduced the Manhattan Principles on “One World, One Health” written by Robert A. Cook, William B. Karesh, and Steven A. Osofsky. [2]

The Manhattan Principles “lists 12 recommendations (see below) for establishing a more holistic approach to preventing epidemic / epizootic disease and for maintaining ecosystem integrity for the benefit of humans, their domesticated animals, and the foundational biodiversity that supports us all.” [6]

  • Dr Karesh became Executive VP for Health and Policy for EcoHealth Alliance and the WHO’s IHR roster (in case of a public health emergency) as well CFR and other influential organisations and is quoted as coining the term “One Health” in 2003.
  • Dr Osofsky launched and managed some of the first major applied One Health global programs, [5] which WCS expressed as an “exciting societal ‘tipping point’ toward ‘One Health’ thinking” – the  One World, One Health™ approach.
October 11 2004

Dr Fauci acknowledges the superiority of natural acquired immunity

On October 11, 2004 while speaking with the Washington Journal, Dr Anthony Fauci acknowledges naturally acquired immunity through getting infected is superior relative to vaccine-acquired immunity, to the respiratory virus influenza.

“”It’s the most potent vaccination, is getting infected youreslf““
says Dr Fauci

Natural immunity has been known “since the Athenian plague in 430 B.C”.

November 1 2004

International Finance Facility for Immunisation (IFFIm) begins

In November 2004 the United Kingdom treasury and France announce their commitment to launch an International Finance Facility for Immunisation (IFFIm) – a pilot that would apply the principles of the broader IFF on a smaller scale to the immunisation sector.  The International Finance Facility (IFF) starting January 2003, was inspired to provide development assistance funds for the United Nations 2015 Millennium Development Goals (MDG) to end global poverty. [1]

In his speech in May 2005 addressing the World Health Assembly, Bill Gates mentioned the International Financing Facility for Immunizations which was “[p]roposed by the United Kingdom, with support pledged by France, Germany, Sweden, and Italy.”  Gates went on to say that “this initiative would provide developing countries with the reliable funding they need, year after year, to buy vaccines, which gives the private sector the market incentive to make them and deliver them. Market forces will work for poor people only if governments put up the funds to create a market.”

IFFIm is a international development institution and vital component of GAVI’s capital structure.  The IFFIm is designed to accelerate the availability of funds to be used for health and immunisation programmes through the GAVI Alliance (GAVI) in 70 of the poorest countries around the world.  The IFFIm is ran by the World Bank [2, 34]

In November 7, 2006 the IFFIm launch their inaugural Vaccine Bonds, their means for raising capital and being able to provide consistent and predictable finance for GAVI to fund their vaccine programs. [1]

December 13 2004

NIH begin new SARS DNA vaccine trial

On December 13, 2004 the first U.S. SARS vaccine trial began at NIH, tested in 10 healthy volunteers to be followed up for 32 weeks (appox. 8 months) [1]

Stated in a press release ““The Vaccine Research Center, a cutting-edge facility established here at NIH just five years ago, encompasses the entire spectrum of vaccine development from basic research to clinical testing,” says NIH Director Elias A. Zerhouni, M.D. “This is why our team at NIAID has been able to develop this vaccine at an unprecedented pace, using technological discoveries that were not available just a few short years ago.”

Dr Anthony Fauci stated: “Instead of using weakened or inactivated virus, which is typical for vaccine development, the new vaccine is composed of a small circular piece of DNA [plasmids] that encodes the viral spike protein. Scientists modified the DNA to minimize the risk of it combining with the SARS virus or other viruses of the SARS type, called coronaviruses….Scientists expect that the DNA will direct human cells to produce proteins very similar to the SARS spike protein. The immune system should recognize these proteins as foreign and then mount a defense against them. If the vaccinated person ever encounters the actual SARS virus, his or her immune system will be primed to neutralize it.”

By April 2003, NIAID-funded researchers in Hong Kong were the first to show that SARS is a viral disease. They soon proved that a newly emerging coronavirus causes SARS. By May, an international collaboration of researchers had decoded the genetic sequence of the SARS coronavirus, opening many avenues of research to develop diagnostic tests, therapies and vaccines.

2005
January 1 2005

A Decade of Education for Sustainable Development (2005-2014)

Starting 2005 the United Nations began their Decade of Education for Sustainable Development (DESD) aiming “at integrating the principles and practices of sustainable development [Agenda 21] into all aspects of education and learning, to encourage changes in knowledge, values and attitudes with the vision of enabling a more sustainable and just society for all.” [1, 2, 3]

UNESCO’s Global Action Programme (GAP) was launched at the World Conference on Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) in November 2014 in Aichi-Nagoya, Japan. It focuses on generating and scaling up ESD action at all levels and in all areas of education, and in all sustainable development sectors. [4]

If we can shape the minds of children it will be easier to implement the Sustainable Development goals!

January 14 2005

Atlantic Storm – smallpox bioterrorist simulation

Atlantic Storm, a bioterrorism “table-top” simulation based on a scenario 0f a smallpox outbreak, was convened on January 14, 2005 and organized by the Center for Biosecurity of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), the Center for Transatlantic Relations of the Johns Hopkins University (JHU), and the Transatlantic Biosecurity Network.

The event was sponsored by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the German Marshall Fund of the United States, and the Nuclear Threat Initiative. [1, 2, 3]

January 26 2005

The Real ID Act of 2005 – the prelude to digital ID and vaccine cards

On the back of 9/11, on January 26, 2005 the US government introduce the federal Real ID Act of 2005 (HR 418), which is passed into law later that year “essentially standardized ID requirements for all states” or centralising control! The legislation is implemented by the Department of Homeland Security. [1, 2]

By January 2019 it is recognised this centralised/standardised ID system is an international reaching program, with control repercussions for everyone. Making it impossible to work, make a living, travel without their ID! [@1:05:45]

Argentina added a “vaccination card” [@52min] to their drivers licence in December 2018, which happened to be the country where Pfizer concentrated their COVID-19 vaccine phase III clinical trial – coincidence? [3]

May 23 2005

WHO International Health Regulations (2005) signed

At 58th World Heath Assembly (WHA) on May 23, 2005, 194 Member States adopted a new set of International Health Regulations (2005) (IHR) to manage a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC).  The IHR are a “key global instrument for protection against the international spread of disease.”  This is a legally-binding instrument of international law for member states which came into force June 15, 2007. [1, 2, 5]

Which this regulatory update the term  Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) and what constitutes it’s determination is found in Article 12.

When a PHEIC is declared by the WHO Director-General, as advised by an his/her self appointed Emergency Committee, the Member States are obliged (under international law) to follow the Directions of the WHO Director General.  Also note, the WHO Director General consults with the Member State before an Emergency Committee is convened.

Under the IHR, Australia, as a Member State who’s signed the agreement, is now legally obliged to follow directives given by WHO Director-General.  It is important to note that declaring a “pandemic” has no international response power!


History: “In 1948, the WHO constitution came into force and in May 1951 WHO Member States adopted the International Sanitary Regulations (ISR), which were renamed the International Health Regulations in 1969 [3]. The regulations were modified in 1973 and 1981.   IHR were originally intended to help monitor and control six serious infectious diseases: cholera, plague, yellow fever, smallpox, relapsing fever and typhus which were reported in the WHO Weekly Epidemiological Record (WER).  Today, only cholera, plague and yellow fever are notifiable diseases.” [4]

August 1 2005

CCP known to have an “offensive biological weapons program”

The US State Department released a report dated August 2005 titled “Adherence to and compliance with arms control, nonproliferation and diarmamament agreements and commitments

The report examined the compliance of  China, Cuba, Iran, Iraq, Libya, North Korea, Russia (and the former Soviet Union) and Syria to the United Nations 1972 Biological Weapons Convention (BWC).

They determined that “communist China maintained an offensive biological weapons program in violation of its treaty commitments and that it was run in part by an arm of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Academy of Military Medical Sciences (AMMS). That report specifically cited the AMMS’ Fifth Institute as the epicenter of the country’s bioweapons program.”

From 2015, a “decade later, multiple medical publications emerged from China that linked the AMMS to research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology”.  The same lab that received grant funding from Dr Fauci’s NIAID. [1, 2]

It was reported that a “2015 book in which China scientists tied to both AMMS and the Wuhan lab declared that coronaviruses were the leading edge of a new era of genetic weapons warfare”…”The central premise of the AMMS book is that SARS-CoV-1, the strain of coronavirus that caused the 2002 SARS outbreak, did not emerge naturally but was a chimeric virus artificially engineered as a genetic weapon to infect humans.”! [3]

August 22 2005

Chloroquine shows strong antiviral properties in SARS-CoV in-vitro study

Virology Journal is the official publication of the National Institute of Health which is headed by Dr Anthony Fauci.

In August 2005 the authors of a paper, that was sponsored by NIH, reported from their in vitro studies in primate cells that “chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection”  and that “these inhibitory effects are observed when the cells are treated with the drug either before or after exposure to the virus, suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage.”

Chloroquine or Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), it’s milder form, should have been potential study candidates to prevent and treat SARS-CoV-2 from the beginning of the pandemic. This study suggests early timing is key.

Studies by official agencies, designed experiments to use the drug late – in hospital settings, and demonstrated this timing to be ineffective – no surprise there.  Which is contrary to how frontline doctors used it in the very early stages of virual infection and they reported great success.

Why did officials push vaccines from the beginning when science held this information, albeit anecdotal, but important?

The authors stated that “concentrations of 10 uM completely abolished SARS-CoV infection. What other viruses could this cheap, off-patent drug  work against, and what effect would that have on the pharmaceutical market?

August 23 2005

Study: RNA shown to evade the innate immune system if altered to pseudouridine

In August 2005 Dr’s Weissman and Kariko published a paper showing a way for foreign mRNA to evade the body’s immune system, which became a “scientific milestone” that was key to the advancement of the mRNA vaccines in 2020″.  This codon-optimisation technique allows the mRNA to last longer.

By modifying the RNA code (replacing the nucleoside uradine with pseudouradine [Ψ] a synthetic uradine), a foreign RNA is able to bypass the immune systems first line of defense: the innate immune system.  It does this by “turning-off ” the Toll-like receptors (TLR) – the body’s natural warning system!  Without this change the “vaccine” RNA would get broken down before the hijacked cells of the body would have a chance to make the foreign protein which a then-immune-antibody response would be wanted.

“Toll-like receptors are important components in defence against infection and downstream effects may also include inhibition of CD8 T cell response. CD8 is a vital part of the immune system’s ability to eradicate infection and cancer.” [2]

In 2016 the effects of Ψ were still largely unknown!

By 2020 it is simply “assumed” that the RNA will be “transient” like natural mRNA, but an “off-switch” is unknown for the modified vaccine mRNA as explained by Geneticist Professor Alexandra Henrion-Caude. [1]

In September 2021 Weissman and Kariko won the 2021 Lasker Clinical Medical Research Award for this 2005 work developing this messenger RNA technology, but missed out on the Nobel Prize.

December 30 2005

US: Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP)

Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP) arose as part of the December 30, 2005 Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act), and “was pushed through to shield drug companies from lawsuits over products like the anthrax and smallpox vaccines, which had a relatively high rate of dangerous side effects.” [1, 2]

CICP “has just four employees and few hallmarks of an ordinary court. Decisions are made in secret by government officials, claimants can’t appeal to a judge and payments in most death cases are capped at $370,376.” – this court was “created by a 2005 law specifically to deal with vaccines developed under emergency authorization.” [3, 4, 5, 6]

2006
February 12 2006

The term “social distancing” is first coined

On February 12, 2006 the phrase “social distancing” was first coined in a New York times article:

If the avian flu goes pandemic while Tamiflu and vaccines are still in short supply, experts say, the only protection most Americans will have is “social distancing,” which is the new politically correct way of saying “quarantine.”

But distancing also encompasses less drastic measures, like wearing face masks, staying out of elevators — and the [elbow] bump.

The “highly contagious” (spreads easily) H5N1 avian flu of 2005-06, went away “without the imposition of totalitarian controls that the U.S. president sought at the time.”   The Bush government produced a national strategy pandemic report in November 2005, the proposed “plans were never deployed. At the time, not many people took the thing that seriously. There were tests and a vaccine available, though not widely used. In 2005, 98 people died globally, and another 115 the following year.” [1]

March 21 2006

Twitter begins

On March 21, 2006 Jack Dorsey, an engineer at Odeo, sent the first-ever tweet from @Jack (“just setting up my twttr”). Four month later on July 15, 2006 the San Francisco-based podcasting company Odeo officially released Twttr to the public, and within 6 months changes it’s name to Twitter. [1, 2]

Twitter was founded by Evan Williams, Jack Dorsey, Noah Glass, Biz Stone. It began as a short messaging service (SMS) for groups, starting with a founder-imposed 140-character limit, which later extended to 280 characters. [3]

In March 2007 the platform used the South by Southwest convention in Texas to “catapult itself into the limelight”, at that time “more than 60,000 tweets were sent per day”. [4]

In September 13, 2013 Twitter tweeted, that they had filed with the SEC to go public, and on November 7, 2013 they officially became a publicly traded company opening at $45.10/share, a value of $31 billion with around 200 million users.

Twitter’s “prominence rose” with the election campaign of President Donald Trump in 2016, he used the platform to get messages to the people which the “fake news” media and “fact checkers” refused to cover without bias. [9, 10, 11]  On January 8, 2021 Twitter decided to permanent suspend President Trump’s official account claiming he incited violence.

At the beginning of 2016 Twitter employed 3,900 people and the platform has 500 million tweets sent each day [5], with 310 million users, the user base grew to 330 million by 2018 end [6]. In Q1 2019, Twitter changed its account reporting method to ‘Monetizable Daily Active Users’ (mDAUs). [8]

By year end 2019 the platform had 152 million mDAUs and 2021 yr end 217 million. In 2021 391 million accounts have no followers at all! [7]   The “platform hit its peak in Q1 2018 when it clocked in 336 million monthly active users” and declined there after, allegedly due to removing bot accounts.

On October 27, 2022 Elon Musk buys out all of Twitter for $54.20 per share, a takeover that was announced on April 25, 2022.  Musk’s objective to make Twitter the “common digital town square” and bring back free speech.

May 1 2006

Origin of “Lockdown” – a school project

At a May 1, 2006, Science and Engineering fair in Indianapolis, 15 year old Laura Glass’ science project laid the plan for 2020 social distancing and lockdowns. [1, 2, 6]  Maybe Laura was inspired by the New York Times article earlier that year which mentioned “social distancing“?

Laura’s father, Dr Robert Glass, “a senior scientist at Sandia in New Mexico who specialized in building advanced models to explain how complex systems work” [3] explored the separation and closure concept further and the paper “Targeted Social Distancing Designs for Pandemic Influenza” was published by the CDC in November 2006.

This concept flowed through Bush administration “federal bureaucracy in 2006 and 2007, it was viewed as impractical, unnecessary and politically infeasible.” But by February 2007, the CDC wrote the Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs) policy for pandemic influenza mitigation, which included “social distancing” and “stay at home” and closure of schools. [4]

Disease mitigation was challenged by Johns Hopkins academics in 2006. [5]

MORE

August 21 2006

Patent filed for modified mRNA using pseudouridine

On August 21, 2006 the University of Pennsylvania (UPenn) filed a patent titled “RNA containing modified nucleosides and methods of use thereof“, on behalf of the two “inventors” Katalin Kariko and Drew Weissman.   On October 2, 2012 the patent application was granted.

The patent is, in part, for the used of “pseudouridine” in create a synthetic mRNA code, which help’s the mRNA evade immune detection and last longer than natural mRNA

In 2007, the companies mRNA RiboTherapeutics Inc. and CellScript LLC. were established, both connected to Gary Dahl, the director and CEO respectively.  mRNA RiboTherapeutics has an exclusive license to the patent from the Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania. That patent was then sublicensed to CellScript. [2, 3, 4, 5]

In 2017, CellScript signed a “Patent Sublicense Agreement” with Moderna on Jun 26, 2017 and the next month mRNA RiboTherapeutics signed one on July 14, 2017 with BioNTech.

CellScript, who supplies the modified mRNA [with minimal safety data], went from $7.4M in revenue in 2019 to just under $50M in 2020.  Moderna was to pay “a non-refundable, non-creditable sublicense fee of twenty-two million U.S. dollars ($22,000,000)” by an undisclosed date in 2019, though BioNTech’s fees & royalties are not disclosed.

September 27 2006

US establishes BARDA for advanced pandemic countermeasure development

On September 27, 2006 the US House passed the Biodefense and Pandemic Vaccine and Drug Development Act of 2006 (H. R. 5533) which established the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) within in the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). BARDA was set up to develop advanced countermeasures to pandemic viruses and defenses against biological attacks, and build on Project BioSheild. [1]

The bill also called for HHS to establish a National Biodefense Science Board with public and private members to advise HHS on current and future trends and advances in biological and life sciences, biotechnology, and genetic engineering. [2, 3]  Their positions were meant to last 3 years, this doesn’t appear to be the case for many members in the role since 20182023! [4]

  • BARDA were responsible for coordinating the FDA’s revoking of the EUA for Hydroxychloroquine (which should have been an Expanded Access IND protocol in the first place, but FDA’s Janet Woodcock encouraged BARDA to apply for EUA instead) > WATCH

On this very same day in 2006, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals was awarded $23 from HHS to help launch their “new initiative dubbed Alnylam Biodefense” for the development of new biodefense therapies. In 2018 the FDA approved Alnylam’s first Lipid Nanoparticle (LNP) mRNA injectable product called patisiran traded as ONPATTRO™.  This product grandfathered in the “safety” data for LNP technology used in the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines.

November 7 2006

IFFIm Vaccine Bonds launched

On November 7, 2006 the International Finance Facility for Immunisation (IFFIm) issues its inaugural Vaccine Bonds. IFFIm raises finance by issuing bonds in the capital markets and so converts long-term government pledges into immediately available cash resources.  Proceeds raised are used by GAVI Alliance to fund their effort to immunise children in the poorest countries of the world in order “to save the lives of millions of the poorest children”.

The IFFIm uses long-term pledges [$6.3 billion over 23 years] from donor governments to sell ‘vaccine bonds’ in the London and Tokyo capital markets, borrowing against donor countries’ commitments, and provide the raised funds for GAVI programmes, which are the agenda‘s of the WHO.

Launched in 2006, IFFIm [vaccine bonds] was the first aid-financing entity in history to attract legally-binding commitments of up to 20 years from donors and offers the “predictability” that developing countries need to make long-term budget and planning decisions about immunisation programmes.”

Australia and other countries have pledged (legally binding grant payments) to contribute US$6.8 billion to IFFIM spanning 32 years. These funds are used to repay IFFIm bondholders.

Australia issued Kangaroo Bonds in 2010.

These tax-payer funded government pledges form legally binding financial commitment for vaccines!

If off-patent, cheap and effective disease solutions were identified and accepted, this would devastate these global investments, using taxpayer funds.

December 19 2006

BARDA is established

On December 19, 2006 the US Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Act of 2006 was passed [1, 2] under which Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) [3] was established within the new Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR) [6] in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). [4, 7]

BARDA was established under Title IV of the Act within HHS to “coordinate the acceleration of countermeasure and product advanced research and development”

BARDA was created to fill a critical gap in the U.S. Government medical countermeasure development pipeline and procurement processes by providing financial and technical support for companies entering the late stages of product development, which have been called the “Valley of Death”. Using a variety of mechanisms, BARDA supports the transition of promising MCM candidates from early research through advanced development to approval and production and, where appropriate, into national stockpiles.” [5]

BARDA uses Project BioShield funding to work with private industry for the procurement and advanced development of medical countermeasures for chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear agents (CBRN). [8]

December 29 2006

Wikileaks begins

Wikileaks was founded in 2006 by Australian computer programmer and activist Julian Assange, it’s first scoop was posted on the website on December 29, 2006. [1, 2, 3]

Wikileaks is a multi-national, award winning, media organization and whistleblower platform that specializes in the analysis and publication of large datasets of censored or otherwise leaked restricted official materials involving war, spying and corruption.  There are many mirrored sites in various countries.

“We believe that transparency in government activities leads to reduced corruption, better government and stronger democracies.”

WikiLeaks received its first batch of sensitive documents not from a whistleblower but from The Onion Router (Tor), an encryption network designed to allow users to transmit data anonymously. By early 2007 Wikileaks had “received over 1.2 million documents so far from dissident communities and anonymous sources.”

Wikileaks has helped to reveal the level of corruption in the world:  Climategate, Hillary’s private and DNC emails, John Podesta emails, Guantánamo Bay, wars, CIA, chlorine dioxide, Vault 7, and so much more.

2007
January 22 2007

PCR test causes pseudo-epidemic chaos

By 2007 the PCR test is increasing in usage to diagnose disease and is instrumental in escalating the incidence of pseudo-epidemics.  In 2006 the PCR test was relied upon for its speed and highly sensitive nature, and led epidemiologists and infectious disease specialists to use it’s positive result to diagnose what initially was suspected whooping cough epidemic.   [1]

The 2006 coughing spree at the Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center caused officials to PCR test all staff, furloughing and quarantining them until their PCR test was returned.  When results came in 142 people tested positive for Whooping Cough, and thousands were “treated” with antibiotics and vaccines.  The hospital ICU was closed. Eight months later, by January 22, 2007, the hospital staff were informed it was a false alarm. [2]

“Not a single case of whooping cough was confirmed with the definitive test, growing the bacterium, Bordetella pertussis, in the laboratory.”

It’s a problem; we know it’s a problem,” … “My guess is that what happened at Dartmouth is going to become more common.said Dr. Perl

The tests’ “very sensitivity makes false positives likely, and when hundreds or thousands of people are [mass] tested, as occurred at Dartmouth, false positives can make it seem like there is an epidemic.”

 

February 1 2007

HHS introduces Pandemic Severity Index based on CFR

On February 1, 2007 the US Health & Human Services released a Community Mitigation Guidance report for “Early, Targeted, Layered Use of Nonpharmaceutical Interventions” (NPIs).  This report introduced, for the first time, a Pandemic Severity Index (PSI) in which the case fatality ratio (CFR) (the proportion of deaths among clinically ill persons) serves as the critical driver for categorizing the severity of a pandemic. [1]

NPI’s of isolation and quarantine were promoted  as “voluntary”.   Teleworking was promoted – as online was still ramping up.

The CFR is “a single criterion that will likely be known even early in a pandemic when small clusters and outbreak are occurring”, such as was known for COVID-19 in February 2020. [2]

May 1 2007

Aaron Russo shares New World Order plan

Before Aaron Russo died in August 2007, he sat down and with Alex Jones for an interview around mid 2007, and revealed information that his friend Nick Rockefeller shared about the “elites” plans to bring their New World Order plan to fruition.  Their plans to implant an RFID chip into every person.  In 2006 Russo released his revealing documentary movie “America: Freedom to Fascism” exposing the private Federal Reserve bank and the illegal IRS/tax system.

Conspiracy theory or insider information?

WATCH

June 15 2007

WHO International Health Regulations (2005) went into force

The World Health Assembly adopted revised International Health Regulations (2005) (IHR) on 23 May 2005,  and it went into force on June 15, 2007 for all 194 member states who signed. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

“This international legal instrument governs the role of the World Health Organization (WHO) and its member countries, including the United States, in identifying, responding to, and sharing information about events that might constitute a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC). A PHEIC is an extraordinary event that constitutes a public health risk to other countries through international spread of disease and potentially requires a coordinated international response. All WHO member countries are required to notify WHO of a potential PHEIC. WHO makes the final determination about the existence of a PHEIC.” [6]

“The purpose and scope of the IHR (2005) are to prevent, protect against, control and provide a public health response to the international spread of disease in ways that are commensurate with and restricted to public health risks, and which avoid unnecessary interference with international traffic and trade. The IHR (2005) provide a framework for WHO epidemic alert and rapid response activities already being implemented in collaboration with countries to control international outbreaks and to strengthen international public health security.”

History of IHR (2005) – HERE

October 8 2007

WHO release guidance to fast-track pandemic influenza vaccine regulatory process

The WHO considers vaccines to be an important medical intervention for reducing illness and deaths during a pandemic, but during the previous 1957 and 1968 pandemics, vaccines arrived too late.  So as part of preparedness for an influenza pandemic the WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardisation (ECBS) met in October 8-12, 2007, after which they released their reportRegulatory Preparedness for Human Pandemic Influenza Vaccines“.

ECBS worked together with health officials, regulatory authorities, and vaccine manufacturers to explore a broad range of issues surrounding the regulatory approval of pandemic vaccines, with the objective to approve “fast-track procedures” to “shorten the time between the emergence of a pandemic virus and the availability of safe and effective vaccines.”

“In some cases, pandemic vaccines are not regarded by regulatory authorities as entirely “new” vaccines, as they build on the technology used to produce vaccines for seasonal influenza….[such as is] applied to “strain changes””

Expedited approval can be given in the US when the manufacturer “intends to use the same manufacturing process” for an already licensed vaccine. The EU has a “rolling review procedure” or they use studies from “mock-up” vaccines, thus negating the “need” for going through the evaluation process.

A pandemic vaccine can only be legally considered when there is a pandemic, or more specifically when there is a public health of international concern declared.  19 months later the WHO changed the definition of a pandemic, just before the 2009 influenza pandemic was declared!

2008
January 22 2008

2008 Financial Crisis

In response to a struggling housing market, the Federal Market Open Committee (FMOC) began lowering the fed funds rate, dropping to 3.5% on January 22, 2008, then to 3.0% a week later, hoping to restore demand. This marked the start of the 2008 financial crisis, the worst economic disaster since the Great Depression of 1929. [1]

It reached a climax with the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers on September 14, 2008, and the subsequent international banking crisis.

May 19 2008

WHO launches GISAID online database

On May 19, 2008, the WHO Global Initiative on Sharing All Influenza Data (GISAID) was launched at the 61st WHA as a public online database for influenza data, on the back of Indonesia’s 2007 bird flu and the mainstream media’s attention. [1, 2, 3]  The initial funding to “kickstart the development of GISAID’s EpiFlu™ database application” was provided by US HHS.

On April 15, 2010 a public-private partnership was made with the German government where they became the “official host of the GISAID platform and EpiFlu™ database”.  The goal is to have “free worldwide exchange of genetic and epidemiological data on known and newly discovered influenza viruses”.

Melbourne’s Doherty Institute has members on the GISAID governance bodies.

Around April 2020 Coronaviruses began being surveilled by the newly established GISAID EpiCoV platform, which CSIRO uses to track COVID-19 genomes. [4]

The CSL company Seqirus a vaccine manufacture and a “leading innovator in influenza vaccine technologies and pandemic response solutions, is [also] a contributor to the GISAID public-private partnership.”

October 25 2008

One World, One Health™ is endorsed as new strategy for fighting infectious diseases

On October 25, 2008, representatives from more than 120 countries and 26 international and regional organizations attended the 2008 International Ministerial Conference on Avian and Pandemic Influenza in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt. During this meeting, “Contributing to One World, One Health™ – A Strategic Framework for Reducing Risks of Infectious Diseases at the Animal-Human-Ecosystems Interface” was officially released. [1]

The document was put together based on recommendations of the 2007 International Ministerial Conference on Avian and Pandemic Influenza in New Delhi where FAO , OIE , WHO , UNICEF , the World Bank, and the United Nations System Influenza Coordination (UNSIC), said to be “built on the lessons learned from the highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza response during the early 2000’s and presented a strategy for applying the One Health concept to emerging infectious diseases at the animal-human-ecosystem interface.” [2, 3]

2009
January 1 2009

New system for monitoring global health events

EU Medical Information System (MedISys) is an internet monitoring and analysis system developed and managed by JRC, provides global Public Health focused events surveillance, which upon automated threat analysis will generate alerts.

The information processed by MedISys is derived from the Europe Media Monitor (EMM) also developed by the Europe’s Joint Research Center (JRC).

EMM developed around 2009

Automated latest news from or about Australia

February 1 2009

Lipid Nanoparticle developer Acuitas Therapeutics is founded

Acuitas Therapeutics is a private company incorporated in British Columbia, Canada. They were founded in February 2009 (initially as AlCana Technologies). Their “goal is to apply nanotechnology delivery solutions to improve the therapeutic options available to patients.”  They are the developers of the lipid nanoparticle (LNP) used to delivery mRNA code into cells. [1, 2]

By 2013 they used “rational design” to synthesize “over 200 novel cationic lipids and then screened these in an in vivo model system”.  The process starts with “a key lipid component of stable nucleic acid lipid particles (SNALP)” and has “resulted in the identification of LNP compositions with greatly improved potency and therapeutic index“. [5]

They have “partnered with Alnylam Pharmaceuticals [USA], the University of British Columbia [Canada], IRAP and others on several research and development programs relating to systemic delivery of nucleic acid therapeutics. ”

Acuitas owns intellectual property (IP) rights to LNP technology for development of protein replacement therapeutics.

In 2013 the company found “proof of concept” using mRNA that coded for luciferase, that the Acuitas LNP traveled to the liver when administered intravenously and the cells manufactured and expressed luciferase. [3]

Acuitas Therapeutics’ lipid nanoparticles are labelled ALC-0315 and ALC-0159 [4] and are used by BioNTech-Pfizer in their CV-19 vaccine.

May 6 2009

WHO changes the definition of a ‘pandemic’

By May 6, 2009 the World Health Organisation (WHO) had lowered the standards for defining a pandemic, not taking into account the number of infections and death (page 9, point 25), allowing for a ‘pandemic’ to be declared when a new virus is NOT causing serious harm to most of the population. [2]  This definition change occured between the first lab confirmed cases of a novel Influenza A virus 0n April 29, 2009 in 9 countries and then on June 11, 2009 when cases were reported in a total of 74 countries and territories the WHO Director General Dr Margaret Chan declared a global pandemic for the 2009 H1N1 virus. [3, 4, 5]

The declaration of a ‘pandemic’ after May 6, 2009 can be made simply if “a disease epidemic occurs when there are more cases of that [new] disease than normal.”  On May 3, 2009 there was the additional criteria of an “enormous number of deaths and illness” , this was removed. On May 4, 2009 “deaths and illness” were removed. [6 , 7]

WHO changes the definition of a pandemic May 2006 - Before and after screenshots

By changing the definition of “pandemic” in May 2009 the WHO can declare a PHEIC for the seasonal flu across the globe, excessive mortality and relative lethality are no longer a criteria to be considered.  Declaring a PHEIC is grounds for using vaccines under emergency status.

On the same day Jaques Attali, a French political theorist and special advisor to presidents wrote:

History teaches us that humanity only evolves significantly when it is truly afraid.

The [H1N1 swine flu] pandemic that is beginning could trigger one of these structuring fears.

We will then come to the point, much more quickly than would have been possible on economic grounds alone, of putting in place the foundations of a true world government.

Points to note on pandemic lethality:

  • In 2004 WHO guideline on influenza pandemic vaccines it states “Experts anticipate that the next pandemic, whenever it happens, will be associated with a high death toll and a high degree of illness requiring hospitalization, thus producing a considerable strain on health care resources. Pandemics are global by their very nature, and few countries are likely to be spared.”
  • In 2005 the WHO updated their 1999 global influenza preparedness plan, with new “phases”, but still factored “severity of illness” into their decision for declaring phase 5 & 6, the 2009 update removed “severity“.  Every year seasonal flu is a global disease – a pandemic! [8]
  • 2009-10 Why the WHO faked a pandemic – READ, READ
  • February 24, 2020 WHO states: “A pandemic is the worldwide spread of a new disease.” [1]

“Pandemic Preparedness” with this now broad definition of what constitutes a “pandemic” can easily be employed as a weapon of global “health” control

June 1 2009

RNA Therapeutics Institute begins

In June 2009, the University of Massachusetts Medical School begins an new research paradigm initiative the RNA Therapeutics Institute (RTI) with Prof. Melissa J. Moore as co-director. (In 2016 she becomes Moderna‘s Chief Scientific Officer and 2017 is elected to the influencial National Institute of Sciences). [2]

“RTI represents a new model for scientific exploration… By interweaving basic and applied nucleic acid scientists with clinicians dedicated to finding new cures, our goal is to create a new paradigm for organizing molecular research that enables the rapid application of new biological discoveries to solutions for unmet challenges in human health” and curing diseases.  RNA both creates and regulates the complex patterns of gene expression, understanding RNA is the key challenges for molecular biology in the 21st century. [1]

June 11 2009

WHO declares novel H1N1 influenza a pandemic

On June 11, 2009, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the novel influenza A (H1N1) virus (called Swine Flu) had reached Phase 6 of their April 2009 (updated from 2005) version of the Pandemic influenza preparedness and response, PIP guidelinesPhase 6 is the designation which indicates a global pandemic is underway as the new virus spread beyond 2 countires and highlights the “need to implement resonse and mitigation efforts”. [1, 2, 3]

0n April 29, 2009 the WHO reported a new H1N1 influenza virus had emerged in 9 countries and spread to 74 by June 11, 2009, thus triggering the first global flu pandemic in 40 years.  On June 11, 2009, the WHO Director General Dr Margaret Chan declared  “the world is now at the start of the 2009 influenza pandemic.”  A month earlier May 6, 2009 the WHO updated the definition of what constitutes a pandemic, on their website! [1, 2, 3]

There was a big push for a fast-tracked vaccine, and 4 months after the declared pandemic, in October 2009 the vaccines rolled out, with manufacturers indemnified! Depending on the countries regulator, clinical trials were either 4 weeks in a few people or not required at all “as many clinical trials were done with similar annual vaccine preparation, and the assumption is that the new pandemic vaccine will behave similarly,” thus shortening the timeline of for approval. [11]

England had ordered 132 million doses before there was any trial data. Only 6 million people, mainly pregnant women and children took the vaccine.  The US CDC in July 2009 stopped testing, and said to diagnose “probable” or “presumed” as H1N1, thus exaggerating cases, but also advised recovered patients to “go ahead and get vaccinated anyway”. [5, 6]

In August 2010, a few months into vaccine roll out Finland, Sweden and Iceland identified a problem in children and adolescents who developed narcolepsy. [4, 7]  In February 8, 2011 the WHO reported 12 countries with narcolepsy cases, but advised to vaccinate anyway as it appears to be associated with only GSK Pandemrix vaccine and not a “general worldwide phenomenon”. The vaccine was also attributed to febrile convulsions and miscarriage.

It took until 2013 before public health England acknowledged they had a narcolepsy problem too, and only 11 years later, in 2020 did public health England published more data that says in retrospect it was worse than we thought! [3, 8, 9, 10]

On August 10, 2010 the WHO declares an end to 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic. [12]

CDC timeline >>>

September 2 2009

Pfizer agrees to pay $2.3 billion for fraud settlement

Pharmaceutical giant Pfizer agrees to pay $2.3 billion for fraudulent marketing with the intent to defraud or mislead.   This is the largest health care fraud settlement in the US Justice Department’s history. [1, 2, 3, 4]

In 2009 Pfizer’s total revenue was around $50 billion, with a declining trend from 2011 to 2020. [5].   Vaccine revenue in 2021 are responsible for 60% of Pfizer’s sales, with an expected $36 billion from vaccines alone!

Will this Big Pharma company be a repeat offender in 2020?

October 1 2009

USAID establishes the Emerging Pandemic Threats Program (EPT-1)

October 2009, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) launched the Emerging Pandemic Threats program (EPT-1), a 5-year program targeting “the early detection of new disease threats; enhanced ‘national-level’ preparedness and response capacities for their effective control; and a reduction in the risk of disease emergence by minimizing those practices and behaviors that trigger the ‘spill-over and spread’ of new pathogens from animal reservoirs to humans.” [1, 2]

This effort “grew out of a recognition that we are now in an era of new, re-emerging and recurring global health threats that argue for a longer-term, more strategic approach to global health security.”

“EPT-1 and Avian Influenza work has been focused on building those capacities and expanding the evidence base that contributes to mitigating the impact of novel “high consequence pathogens” arising from animals.”

In 2014 EPT-2 was born which “will also make major contributions to the Global Health Security Agenda to more effectively address threats posed by the natural emergence of new disease threats, as well as the intentional and/or accidental release of dangerous pathogens.”

November 19 2009

Climategate email scandal begins

Thousands of emails, from the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit (CRU) were released on a server in the city of Tomsk in Siberia, Russia [19, 20, 21] on November 19, 2009, just before the Copenhagen Summit on Global Warming [8, 23, 24, 25]; the email scandal was coined Climategate first by James Delingpole. [1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, 14, 22]

CRU, who’s director is Professor Philip Jones, is recognised as one of the world’s leading institutions concerned with the study of natural and anthropogenic [man-made] climate change, they keep “the global temperature record used to monitor the state of the climate system, as well as statistical software packages and climate models.”  They are a “small group of scientists who have for years been more influential in driving the worldwide alarm over global warming than any others, not least through the role they play at the heart of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).” [26]

“[h]undreds of internal emails written by scientists working at the CRU were obtained by a hacker [or whistleblower] and posted on the internet, some of which appeared to show that researchers had deliberately faked evidence of global warming by manipulating statistics” as climate warming was inconveniently lacking evidence. [8, 18]

“Researchers at CRU, one of the world’s leading research bodies on natural and human-induced climate change, played a key role in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report, which is considered to be the most authoritative report of its kind” [15, 16]

On November 29, 2009 the CRU scientists were “forced to admit they had thrown away most of the raw data that their global temperature calculations were based upon”  which means “other academics are not able to check basic calculations said to show a long-term rise in temperature over the past 150 years.” [17]  The Climategate scientists who conspired to delete emails, escaped criminal conviction on a “statute of limitations” technicality.

“The documents and emails illustrated how prominent climatologists, affiliated with the UN’s International Panel on Climate Change [IPCC], embarked on a venomous and coordinated campaign to ostracize climate skeptics and use their influence to keep dissenting reports from appearing in peer-reviewed journals, as well as using cronyism to avoid compliance with Freedom of Information Act requests”

As reported, 2009 is when “Global Warming” become known as “Climate Change”! [5, 10, 11, 12, 13]
By 2010 when no warming has occurred for 15 years, Obama science advisor wanted to dump the term “global warming” for “global climate disruption“!

Why does IPCC always quote a temperature variation around a zero point?
What average global temperature does that zero point represent, 14 or 15 degrees C?

On the back of these “man-made” Climate Change claims, they also claim that human disease incidence is on the rise!

Climategate WATCH, NOTES
CNN version of Climategate: PART 1, PART 2, PART 3
Australian Bolt Report on Climate Science – 2011

2010
January 29 2010

The “Decade of Vaccines” begins

At the WEF in Davos on January 29, 2010 Bill and Melinda Gates pledged their foundation would commit $10 billion over the next 10 years to help research, develop and deliver vaccines for the world’s poorest countries. And so the Decade of Vaccines (DOV) was “born”. [5, 6]

“Increased vaccination could save more than 8 million children by 2020; significant funding gaps remain,
others must join the effort.”…
We must make this the decade of vaccines,”  said Bill Gates.
“The foundation used a model developed by a consortium led by the Institute of International Programs at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health to project the potential impact of vaccines on childhood deaths over the next 10 years. …By significantly scaling up the delivery of life-saving vaccines in developing countries to 90 percent coverage—including new vaccines to prevent severe diarrhea and pneumonia—the model suggests that we could prevent the deaths of some 7.6 million children under 5 from 2010-2019…The new funding announced today is in addition to the $4.5 billion that the Gates Foundation has already committed to vaccine research, development and delivery to date across its entire disease portfolio since its inception.” [3, 4]
The Gates Foundation’s commitment to vaccines is unprecedented, but just a small part of what is needed. It’s absolutely crucial that both governments and the private sector step up efforts to provide life-saving vaccines to children who need them most.”
said WHO Director-General Margaret Chan
“The Gateses said that increased investment in vaccines by governments and the private sector could help developing countries dramatically reduce child mortality by the end of the decade…”
By December 2, 2010 global health leaders including the World Health Organization (WHO), UNICEF, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) together with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) announced a collaboration to increase coordination across the international vaccine community and create a Global Vaccine Action Plan. “This plan will build on the successes of current work to achieve key milestones in the discovery, development and delivery of lifesaving vaccines to the most vulnerable populations in the poorest countries over the next decade.” [1, 2]
2010 marked Bill Gates’ second year of  “full-time work was as co-chair of the [BMG] foundation”, along with Melinda and his father.
The WHO Global Vaccine Action Plan (GVAP) was endorsed by the 194 Member States of the World Health Assembly in May 2012 ― is a framework to prevent millions of deaths by 2020 through more equitable access to existing vaccines for people in all communities.”
In 2010 the global vaccine market was  estimated at $7 billion. By re-definine new vaccine technology, the market was expected to triple to more than $20 billion by 2015, in just 5 years. “The future vaccine market will take advantage of advances in immunology, genetics, and molecular biology to address a whole new range of cancer and infectious disease targets.”
February 1 2010

WBC for Sustainable Development release their “Vision 2050” report

The World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) an independent organisation established in 1995 released their Vision 2050: The New Agenda for Business report in February 2010.  Providing a vision of “what could be” and mapping out the transformative changes that would be necessary to allow over 9 billion people to be living well, within the boundaries of the planet” by 2050.  [1, 2, 3, 4]

They see 2 time timeframes for the pathway forward: “the Turbulent Teens, from 2010 to 2020, and Transformation Time, from 2020 to 2050.” They believe “traits formed during the first decade mature into more consistent knowledge, behavior and solutions. It is a period of growing consensus…” So that by 2020 through 2050 actions which “begun in the previous decade will gain momentum” and transformation will happen. [pg 10]

In this 2010 report on page 64, they conclude that “Crisis. Opportunity. It is a business cliché, but there is truth in it. The perfect storm we face, of environment, population, resources and economy, will bring with it many opportunities” for example “medicine to discover“.

The report planned the next 40-year journey, and they invite governments and civil leaders to join them.  “Our leaders efforts to build back better are focused upon a recovery which appears to have been planned long before anyone had even heard of SARS-CoV-2. [5, 6]

Their updated 2020 report, A Time To Transform, aims to transform the global economy to meet the United Nations Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the targets of the Paris Agreement.[8, 9]

The COVID-19 “opportunity” has brought with it a “Time to Transform” from the Turbulent Teens (2010-2020) to Transformation.

Given this organisations is linked to WEF, is their goal also for us (non-corporates) to “own nothing and be happy.”? [7]

April 1 2010

Tripartite Collaboration (FAO-OIE-WHO) to address global health risks – One Health foundation

On April 2010 three international orgaisations FAO, OIE & WHO released  A Tripartite Concept Note document which “sets a strategic direction for FAO-OIE-WHO to take together and proposes a long term basis for international collaboration aimed at coordinating global activities to address health risks at the human-animal- ecosystems interfaces.” [1]

  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
  • World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH, founded as OIE)
  • World Health Organization (WHO)

“The emergence of new or the re-emergence of existing animal diseases, including zoonoses, the growing threat of transboundary animal
diseases, the impact of environmental changes and globalization, as well as new societal demands related to food security, food safety, public health and animal welfare, emphasize the critical need for collaboration between the three organizations.”  This builds the foundation for One Health.

  • “In February 2021, the three organizations called on the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) to join the Tripartite, reaffirming the importance of the environmental dimension of the One Health collaboration”
  • On October 14, 2022 the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) joined to become The Quadripartite Organizations
May 1 2010

Rockefeller Report: Lock Step Scenario

A May 1, 2010 report called “Scenarios for the future of technology and international development” and sponsored by the Rockefeller Foundation was released.  In it 4 different future scenario’s were envisioned to explore how society might develop over the next 15-20 years.

The Lock Step “scenario” (pg 18) covers a pandemic which the world has been anticipating! A deadly flu which spreads globally, leading to panic.  China with it’s restrictive approach is seen to effectively manage the crisis, of which mask wearing remains in place even after the pandemic is over! [1]

It noted “citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty — and their privacy…in exchange for greater safety and stability,” including “biometric IDs for all citizens.”  A scenario where “leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power.”  It covers lockdowns, temperature checks, masks and more.

The studies underlying objective is to “seed a new strategic conversation among the key public, private, and philanthropic stakeholders about technology and development at the policy, program, and human levels.”

Ten years later in 2020 these “scenarios” are reality, and are being brought to the attention of parliament in 2021

June 22 2010

China & Australia study SARS-CoV potential to infect bat species, call for more surveillance

On June 22, 2010, Shi Zhengli from the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China along with other authors including two from Australia’s CSIRO in Geelong, Victoria, published the study “Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) proteins of different bat species confer variable susceptibility to SARS-CoV entry” which called for the “continuation and expansion of field surveillance studies among different bat populations” as “bats could be the natural reservoir of SARS-CoV” with 2 species in particular.

They looked at 7 additional bat species and “tested their interactions with human SARS-CoV spike protein using both HIV-based pseudotype and live SARS-CoV infection assays. …Further, the alteration of several key residues either decreased or enhanced bat ACE2 receptor efficiency.”

It was stated “[c]himeric ACE2 was constructed by combining the N-terminal region of bat ACE2 with the C-terminal portion of human ACE2″… to see if SARS-CoV that infects human cells could infect bat cells via ACE2 receptors.

The 2019 SARS-CoV-2 genome was said to have HIV insertions.  Could this have resulted from continuation of this chimeric work? [1, 2]

August 10 2010

WHO declares end to 2009 pandemic

On August 10, 2010 the World Health Organisation (WHO) declares an end to 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic. [1]

September 21 2010

Wildlife Trust becomes EcoHealth Alliance – Leader in One Health movement

In a press release September 21, 2010 the “Wildlife Trust”, a non-profit international conservation organization founded in 1971, and stated to be “dedicated to protecting wildlife and safeguarding human and animal health”, announced that the organization will be re-branded with a new name and tagline: EcoHealth Alliance, “Local Conservation, Global Health.” [1, 2]

Dr. Peter Daszak, president of EcoHealth Alliance said

Building on our strong history, we have grown beyond our original conservation focus to become the central organization defining the intersection of local conservation and global health…A leader in the One Health movement which began in 2004, EcoHealth Alliance is on the forefront of informing the public, businesses, and the scientific community about emerging diseases, including potential pandemics.” [3]

Through The Intercept FOI requests over $95 million of EcoHealth Alliance funding comes from USAID and US Department of Defence into potential “bioweapons” research. [4, 5]

EcoHealth Alliance is in the center of tracking and cataloguing animal viruse genetic sequences and providing finance to laboratories for Gain-of-Function/Dual Use research.

November 4 2010

Dr Ralph Baric co-authors paper on Zinc ionophores – an effective way to treat coronaviruses

Dr Ralph Baric of University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, co-authors a paper that demonstrates that zinc inhibits RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), which functions as the core enzyme for the replication of positive-stranded RNA (+RNA) viruses such as influenza viruses and coronaviruses. Note COVID-19 vaccine mRNA is positively charged.  But zinc cannot enter the cell without an ionophore. [1]

An ionophore is a fat-soluble substance that can transport non-fat soluble elements (such as zinc) across the cell membrane to aid entry into the cell, from there the zinc can inhibit viral replication. [2, 3]

Combining zinc with an ionophore such as hydroxychloroquine could inhibit viral replication, and thus prevent disease progression.

Dr Ralph Baric is intimately involved in coronavirus GOF research with Zhengli Shi from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, as well as he has received funding for work on Remdesivir (GS-5734) by Gilead.

 

2011
February 28 2011

DNA: Its “purpose” and susceptibility may be different than what we’ve been taught

A paper published in Int. J. of Radiation Biology called “DNA is a fractal antenna in electromagnetic fields”, concludes that “DNA appears to possess the two structural characteristics of fractal antennas, electronic conduction and self symmetry. These properties contribute to greater reactivity of DNA with EMF in the environment, and the DNA damage could account for increases”…in adverse health outcomes such as cancer.

Science is still figuring out the complexities of our genetic material and the role it plays in life and health, and to introduce a brand new gene-based technology referred to as a “vaccine” on the global population (2021), at the same time as rolling out 5G towers is alarming.

March 7 2011

UN PrepCom 2 marks beginning of the Sustainable Development Goals

The United Nations Committee on Sustainable Development (UNCSD) hold their second session of the Preparatory Committee (PrepCom 2) at UN HQ in New York on March 7-8, 2011. This meeting marks the begining of the Zero Draft version of “The Future We Want” report which forms the basis for the the 2015 Sustainable Development Goals, along with “the scope of a green economy” which is adopted in the June 2012 second Earth Summit. [1, 2, 3, 4,]

June 1 2011

Foundation for Vaccine Research is launched

As a progression from “It’s Time Campaign”, 14 scientists, led by Peter Hale, together with “advocacy experts” launch the Foundation for Vaccine Research incorporated in Washington DC on June 1, 2011.  The aim of the foundation is “to create global awareness for the need for increased, flexible, long-term funding for vaccine research”. [1, 2]

June 15 2011

CDC: Advanced Molecular Detection (AMD) initiative needed to remain an international leader

Following a June 15, 2011 Future Strategies for Bioinformatics in CDC’s Infectious Diseases Laboratories intenal report which identified a “critical need” for increased Advanced Molecular Detection (AMD) capacity at the CDC.  Concluding “[t]he authoritative analysis and interpretation of scientific data is a critical area where CDC must excel for the Agency to continue to provide international leadership in public health and policy. The mission of CDC will be seriously compromised if the organization does not have the appropriate bioinformatics expertise and computational infrastructure.”  Among other things “Should this occur, CDC will be at risk of going from outdated, to obsolete, and then to irrelevant”

President Obama’s 2014 budget gave life to CDC’s AMD initiative, which may have been motivated with the threat of an” emerging variety of highly antibiotic-resistant bacteria” called superbugs!

Using next-generation sequencing technology to identify complete genetic sequences of microorganisms, the CDC aimed to user a “new era for controlling infectious threats” and “revolutionizing” its “ability to diagnose infectious diseases, investigate and control outbreaks, understand transmission patterns, develop and target vaccines, and determine antimicrobial resistance—all with increased timeliness and accuracy and decreased costs”. [1]

CDC claim “each year the flu costs businesses approximately $10.4 billion in direct costs for hospitalizations and outpatient visits for adults.” CDCs intention is to detect patterns more precisely in order to make better vaccines!

Fast forward November 2020 and AMD becomes the precursor to CDC’s NS3 and SPHERES SARS-CoV-2 genetic sequencing efforts.  [It’s as though they knew the virus would mutate and accelerate variants after vaccine rollout!]

August 1 2011

NIH funded the Single Cell Analysis Project (SCAP)

NIH launched the Single Cell Analysis Project (SCAP), a 5 year Common Fund program aimed to:

  1. Improve our understanding of cell heterogeneity, including defining cell types and dynamic cell states.
  2. Accelerate the development of new innovative tools and approaches fore cell analysis.
  3. Accelerate the validation, translation, and adoption of new technologies.
  4. Engage multidisciplinary teams and attract new approaches and researchers to the field.

Laying the foundation for the future global medical progression. [1]

Grant funding was awarded for such projects that encourage the development of “next-generation, innovative technologies to better define cell heterogeneity in situ.” The techniques were to “provide new analytical measures and manipulations of cellular contents, structure and activity significantly beyond those currently available at the single cell level.”

August 25 2011

IOM: vaccine injury review – “the evidence is inadequate”

On September 25, 2008 a committee of experts met, who were convened by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) to review “the epidemiological, clinical, and biological evidence regarding adverse health events associated with specific vaccines covered by the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.”

Three years later, in a press release on August 25, 2011, they stated “[a]n analysis of more than 1,000 research articles concluded that few health problems are caused by or clearly associated with vaccines.” Also they state “that while no vaccine is 100 percent safe, very few adverse events are shown to be caused by vaccines“.  Their  reportAdverse Effects of Vaccines” was published 2012. [Inadaquate evidence!]

A key component of the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act required the U.S. HHS to collaborate with the Institute of Medicine to assess the safety of vaccines and potential adverse events, especially in children.

The National Academy of Sciences web page specifically states “the MMR vaccine is not associated with autism or childhood diabetes”, but there are many more vaccines than just MMR.

The IOM review found that “the evidence is inadequate to accept or reject a causal relationship between [DTaP] vaccine and autism.”  So when the CDC states there is “no evidence” that [all] vaccines cause autism [4] – they are correct, and through FOIA the CDC can produce NO evidence! [1, @27:30 2].

Also the one DTaP study which happened to “suggest an association between serious neurological disorders and whole-cell pertussis immunization” was “rejected” from the review as it “lacked an unvaccinated comparison population.”!

In 2023, Kathleen Stratton, a NASEM official AGAIN leads a panel of experts to assess, this time, the COVID-19 vaccine specific injury. [3]

September 16 2011

Genome sequencing is now cheap and fast

On September 16, 2011, Richard Resnick in his TED talk revealed that genome sequencing is now so cheap and fast it will open up opportunities for personalised genome sequencing for health care, insurance and politics!

Now what we do is we take a genome, we make maybe 50 copies of it, we cut all those copies up into little 50-base reads, and then we sequence them, massively parallel. And then we bring that into software, and we reassemble it, and we tell you what the story is.”

The Human Genome Project sequenced 3 gigabases which took 15 years, now one run on a modern machine can process 200 gigabases in a week, and that capacity is increasing and now the price of sequencing a base has fallen 100 million times!

With a world wide capacity to sequence human genomes is 50-100 thousand per year, in 2011 and the one lab that represents 20% of all the global capacity is the Bejing Genomics Institute (BGI) in China.

[BGI provided 10 million COVID-19 PCR test kits to Australia.  It is known that the Chinese are building a DNA profiling database for genomic surveillance, which is of great concern for Australians.]

There is still much to learn about the human genome and genetic material.  In March 2022 the first complete, gapless sequence of a human genome revealed there are hidden regions! “These unresolved regions include segmental duplications, ribosomal rRNA gene arrays, and satellite arrays that harbor unexplored variation of unknown consequence” [1]

October 31 2011

Global population reaches 7 billion

On October 31, 2011, top United Nations officials marked the global population reaching 7 billion with a call to action to world leaders to meet the challenges that a growing population poses.

The “implications of the new milestone for sustainability, urbanization and migration in a world where conflicts and weather disasters are driving people from their homes and climate change is exacerbating food and water shortages” provide “opportunities” to take action.

UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon “noted that the world’s population reached 6 billion in 1998, only 13 years ago, and it is expected to grow to 9 billion by the middle of this century, or even a few years earlier – by 2043.”  According to the latest UN figures… the global population would “surge past 9 billion before 2050” and pass 10 billion by 2100 if current fertility rates continue at expected levels.”

With climate change allegedly linked to increased disease epidemics  and population growth this is a significant milestone.

December 16 2011

International Consortium for future pandemics is launced

The International Severe Acute Respiratory Infection Consortium (ISARIC) was launched on December 16, 2011, and is a group of international organisations taking part in a new global consortium organized to prepare clinical research for future influenza pandemics or other rapidly emerging public health threats.

Infectious outbreaks are not limited only to influenza outbreaks but are global phenomena that are occurring with increasing frequency.

The standardized and open-access protocols developed during this consortium will allow researchers from all participating countries to work with, adapt and evolve common clinical case ascertainment. This will ensure that high-quality and comparable clinical research is practiced on a global scale.

As part of The Global Health Network (TGHN) also funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, ISARIC has “an overreaching ambition to change the way in which research is carried out during and between epidemics, ISARIC aims to address the social and ethical issues related to this paradigm change.”

The ISARIC is being launched by the Wellcome Trust, and the UK Medical Research Council, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Inserm, Li Ka Shing Oxford Global Health Programme and the Singapore Ministry of Health.

2012
January 1 2012

Chinese miners fall ill after shoveling bat faeces

Sometime in 2012 in Yunnan province, China, 6 miners become seriously ill with respiratory symptoms after shovelling bat faeces at the bottom of a mine shaft.  The miner’s respiratory virus (RaBtCoV/4991) was said to came from rufous horseshoe bats.

The mineshaft floor was covered with a fungus. “Although the fungus turned out to be the pathogen that had sickened the miners”  Shi speculated “it would only have been a matter of time before they caught the coronaviruses if the mine had not been promptly shut.”

“Shi’s team had been called in to investigate the virus profile of a mineshaft in Yunnan’s mountainous Mojiang County—famous for its fermented Pu’er tea—where six miners suffered from pneumonia-like diseases (two of them died). After sampling the cave for a year the researchers discovered a diverse group of coronaviruses in six bat species. In many cases, multiple viral strains had infected a single animal, turning it into a flying factory of new viruses.” [2]

Since 2013 the Wuhan Institute of Virology has been experimenting with these bat coronaviruses, including their use in 2015 controversial gain-of-function study.

In February 3, 2020, Shi Zhengli et al published paper suggesting SARS-CoV-2 genome was almost 80% identical to that of SARS-CoV, the virus that caused SARS in 2002, but it was 96.2% similar to RaTG13 another genome from Yunnan bat caves. [1]

January 27 2012

Highly pathogenic Influenza virus research voluntarily paused, Fauci argues for it.

On January 27, 2012 it was published that the influenza virus research community implemented a 60-day voluntary moratorium on “gain-of-function” experiments related to “highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 viruses leading to the generation of viruses that are more transmissible in mammals.”

On October 9, 2012 Anthony Fauci, director of  NIAID, and as a key funder of Influenza research, publishes “The Way Forward” for this kind of gain-of-function research. [1]

Fauci wrote “the benefits of such experiments and the resulting knowledge outweigh the risks. It is more likely that a pandemic would occur in nature, and the need to stay ahead of such a threat is a primary reason for performing an experiment that might appear to be risky.”

February 19 2012

The Davos Global Risk Forum sponsors the first One Health Summit

February 19-22, 2012, the first One Health Summit was held in Davos, Switzerland sponsored by the private membership entity called the Global Risk Forum. [1, 2]

The Summit presented the One Health concept as a way to manage health threats, focusing on food safety and security. The conference ended by approving the “Davos One Health Action Plan,” which pinpointed ways to improve public health through multi-sectoral and multi-stakeholder cooperation. [3]

“Many emerging health issues are linked to increasing contact between humans and animals, the industrialization of food production, and environmental pollution. Global change has created new threats to the health of both animals and humans…[associated with the] systemic interconnections of human, animal and environmental health….Being a global movement at the interface of science, society, policy and practice, One Health is, therefore, also deeply interdisciplinary and cross-sectorial.”

February 22 2012

Global Vaccine Safety: Blueprint, Plan and Initiative

In 2011 the WHO and a group of partners developed a strategic document on vaccine safety called the Global Vaccine Safety Blueprint (GVSB) published 22 February 2012.  The Blueprint proposes a strategic plan for strengthening vaccine safety activities globally.  It focuses on building national capacity for vaccine safety in the world’s poorest countries through the coordinated efforts of major stakeholders. [1, 4]

Three months after the GVS Blueprint was published 94 Member States at the 65th World Health Assembly endorsed the Global Vaccine Action Plan (GVAP) serving as a framework to guide immunization efforts through to the end of 2020.

The Global Vaccine Safety Initiative (GVSI) was set up to implement the Blueprint strategy and to provide WHO and partners with a framework for enhancing vaccine pharmacovigilance, that is to better detect, report, and analyse adverse events.

The eight strategic objectives (1-4 pharmacovigilance, 5-8 regulatory system)

  1. Adverse Event Following Immunisation (AEFI) detection
  2. Investigation of safety signals
  3. Vaccine safety communication
  4. Tools and methods
  5. Regulatory framework
  6. Technical support and trainings
  7. Global Analysis and response
  8. Public-private information exchange

How it works: A Global Vaccine Safety Initiative meeting is a general meeting which guides the Global Vaccine Safety Initiative (GVSI) who is the implementation mechanism for the Global Vaccine Safety Blueprint. [2, 3]

As of 2021 the GVS Blueprint is under review, which began December 2018 and again June 2019, in line with deploying the new plan, Immunization Agenda 2030 at the 73rd World Health Assembly in May 2020.  No longer will vaccines be focused be on the ” the world’s poorest countries” they intend to “leave no one behind”.

April 20 2012

Paper cautions use of coronavirus vaccine in humans

A paper published on April 20, 2012 testing a coronavirus vaccine in mice, concludes by warning of “proceeding to application of a SARS-CoV vaccine in humans” because of the reaction the mice experience upon challenged with the virus post vaccination.  Many mice died because of immune priming or antibody dependent enhancement (ADE), where the vaccine induced an immune response that enhanced the bodies reaction upon rechallenge, sending the animals into a cytokine storm.

April 26 2012

Dr Fauci testifies to US Government on H5N1 transmissibility research

Dr Anthony Fauci testifies to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs regarding the “important and intense discourse” to recent manuscripts highlighting the potential risks of conducting “dual use research of concern” (DURC) on the H5N1 avian influenza virus.

These dual use experiments, that genetically manipulate pathogens, could “yield new information” and help “identify molecular targets on pathogenic microbes” that can lead to the development of new vaccines, but also has the potential for bioweapon applications, the latter being DURC.

DURC can yield products that if “misapplied…pose a significant threat with broad potential consequences to public health and safety.”

The research is justified because of the worldwide “thread to public health” from seasonal and pandemic influenza, which is said to be “among the leading global cause of death due to infectious diseases” and is estimated by WHO to cause annually between “250,000 to 500,000 influenza-related deaths” globally.

Experimenting to see “which genetic mutations” alter virus transmissibility or pathogenicity using ferrets as models helps with the goal of developing a “universal” influenza vaccine, of which a “prime-boost” gene-based vaccine seems promising.

June 20 2012

UN Rio+20: the Second Earth Summit: “The Future We Want”

On June 20-22, 2012 the first Earth Summit in 20 years was held again in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil this “marks the 40th anniversary of the first major international political conference that specifically had the word “environment” in its title”.  Officially knowns as the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio+20).  The last Earth Summit was held in Rio in 1992. [1, 2, 3] 40th anniversary of the first major international political conference that specifically had the word “environment” in its title

In January 2012 the committee relesed their “Zero Draft” [6] version of what would be the final document titledThe Future We Want” an extension of the Brundtland Commission’s 1987 “Our Common Futurereport [6].  Members states  were asked to sign onto “10 new sustainable development goals for the planet”.  The “zero draft” was developed by the Co-Chairs and Bureau of the UNCSD Preparatory Committee from March 2011 meetings in New York. [5]

The document was allegedly “leaked” to ahead of time [marketing?!]. [4]

Member States adopted the outcome document The Future We Want that launched a process to develop a set of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to build upon the Millennium Development Goals. The SDGs were intended [for] all countries, not just developing countries. This paradigm shift moves away from outdated development assumptions of the past, and ensures no one is left behind.” [7]

“The Conference also adopted ground-breaking guidelines on green economy policies” in the “context of sustainable development and poverty eradication”.

On March 14,  2013, the first 30-member Open Working Group (OWG) met, to develop a proposal on the SDGs, they held a total of 13 meetings between March 2013 and July 2014, formulating a report containing 17 SDGs and 169 targets. The OWG submitted their proposal to the UNGA for consideration and action at its 68th session in September 2014″. [7] Ahead of the pivotoal  2015 GA.

June 28 2012

UN World Happiness Day is born – brining together 3 pillars of sustainable development

On April 2, 2012, the United Nations held the first ever High-Level Meeting on Happiness and Wellbeing: Defining a New Economic Paradigm. At this meeting “United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon said, “We need a new economic paradigm that recognizes the parity between the three pillars of sustainable development. Social, economic and environmental well-being are indivisible. Together they define gross global happiness.” [3, 4]

It was attended by Australia’s Honourable Tim Fisher (comments in report)

UN International Happiness Day was founded by Jayme Illien and “was officially sanctioned by the United Nations in their UN Resolution 66/281 on June 28,2012, because “happiness as a fundamental human right and goal”. It was first celebrated on March 20, 2013 and annually ever since on the same date all over the world.

Why “Happy”, in Oct 2020 World Economic Forum (WEF) tweetedYou will own NOTHING and you WILL BE HAPPY” and The Great Reset.  According to the self appointed “leaders” the COVID-19 pandemic presented an “opportunity” for their plan to Build Back Better!

  • Who is WEF?
  • United Nations World Order
  • Agenda 2030 means that land and property ownership will be a thing of the past, as ownership leads to “social injustice” [1, 2]

Annual World Happiness Reports started 2012 interlinking with Sustainable Development – stating independence from UN – NGO Parners.

September 1 2012

USDA: First RNA technology vaccine approved – herd-specific vaccines

On September 20, 2012 US based private company Harrisvaccines Inc. announced the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) granted the first licence for a RNA technology vaccine to be used in livestock, this for swine influenza virus (SIV) H3N2. The USDA also approved Harrisvaccines manufacturing facility to make any future animal vaccine. [1]

With this new RNA technology platform “only a gene from an infected animal is required to prepare vaccines in as little as four weeks” allowing the company to “rapidly respond to pandemics” in livestock.  In 2013 Harrisvaccines gained exclusive rights to Alphavax’s technology for use with companion animals.

The advanced process, called SirraVax RNA Particle (RP) technology, which “utilizes a genetic sequence of specific viruses, which can be submitted electronically, to create a vaccine.” This unique technology allows for the production of custom, herd-specific vaccines in a matter of weeks to “rapidly mutating viruses”…”allowing for rapid response to disease outbreaks” both viral or bacterial.

When the H1N1 virus presented itself we were able to develop a custom vaccine in weeks and were the first to get it to market. That proved that we were prepared to change the landscape in regards to livestock immunology.”
says Joel Harris, Head of Sales and Marketing

Harrisvaccines was founded in 2006 in conjuntion with Uni Iowa, in 2015 they were purchased by Merck Animal Health.  In 2016 the USDA grants full license of the vaccine technology platform.

Edible Vaccines – MORE

September 20 2012

MERS: first case reported in Saudi Arabia

On September 20, 2012, a report appeared on ProMed from Saudi Arabia of a case of a novel coronavirus isolated from a male aged 60 years, who died 3 months earlier on June 6, 2012. [1, 2]

The novel betacoronavirus (HCoV-EM) was in time classified as Middle Eastern respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), the virus does not seem to pass easily from person to person. [6]

Early genetic characterization led to the recognition that MERS-CoV was related to SARS-CoV and was thought to have a bat reservoir, and transferred through a camel.

As of October 2021 there have been 2578 MERS cases over 27 countries with 888 deaths reported since April 2012, making a global case fatality rate of 34.4%. [4, 5, 7]

“The emergence of new infectious global threats in the past four decades (e.g. AIDS, H5N1, SARS) has reshaped thinking at the national and international level on the nature and level of public health responses needed for these threats.” [3]

November 1 2012

Scientists warning about Tween 80, a common vaccine ingredient

A paper by Qiu et al, from November 2012 raised “concerns with regard to the indiscriminate use of Tween® 80 in clinical applications” as it is an “extensively used surfactant in parenteral drug formulation”. Tween 80 is otherwise known as PolySorbate 80 and is a common surfactant ingredient used in vaccines.

The paper stated that “Tween® 80 induced the release of histamine, and a 2-fold increase in SC5b-9, 2.5-fold increase in C4d, 1.3-fold increase in Bb, while IgE remained unchanged. It also produced changes in pulmonary pressure, systemic pressure and ECG.”

This may explain the anaphylaxis adverse events seen following the COVID-19 jabs. [1, 2]

December 10 2012

100,000 Genome Project launched – towards genomic medicine

On December 10, 2012, then Prime Minister of UK, David Cameron, launched the 100,000 Genome Project, England’s first mission to sequence 100,000 human genomes by the end of 2017.  The initiative is ” paving the way for a digital NHS, where genomics is “driving the move away from a ‘one size fits all’ approach to treatment, towards personalised, or precision medicine, whereby each patient is treated according to their individual genome sequence.” [1, 2]

Prior genome sequencing ventures launched:

  • 1990 – The Human Genome Project – completed 2003
  • 2008 – 1,000 Genomes Project launched by Wellcome Trust [2, 3, 4, 5]
  • 2010 – 10,000 Genome (UK10K) study launched by Wellcome Trust
  • Feb 2012 – New York Genome Centre for Alzheimers [8, 9]
  • Dec 2012 – 100,000 Genomes Project [6, 7]

Timeline pages:

1800s | 1900-1945 | 1946-1979 | 1980-1999 | 2000-2015 | 2016-2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023

Scroll to Top