On January 13, 2000 Bill Gates announced he stepped down as Microsoft CEO, the company he cofounded in 1975, “to concentrate on software strategy”.  Gates’ personal wealth at the time was estimated at nearly $85 billion.

In 1999, during Microsoft’s monopolistic anti-trust legal proceedings, Bill Gates began to reposition his brand from computer geek to “philanthropist” by forming the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) [ARCHIVE] as a Non-Governmental Organisation (NGO) that “gives back to global communities through increasing access to innovations in education, technology, and world health”, with a strong focus on reproductive health. [5, 6]

The BMGF was officially stated to have launched in 2000.

On January 21, 2000 President Clinton launched the National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI), which will lead the “next industrial revolution”. [1]  In his speech he stated “imagine, materials with 10 times the strength of steel and only a fraction of the weight; shrinking all the information at the Library of Congress into a device the size of a sugar cube; detecting cancerous tumors that are only a few cells in size. Some of these research goals will take 20 or more years to achieve.” [1]

One billionth of a metre is a nanometre.

Getting to this point began with the Interagency Working Group on Nanoscience‘s (IWGN) first report in December 1998 called  Nanostructure Science and Technology – A Worldwide Study this provided a “basis for the Federal government to assess how to make strategic research and development (R&D) investments in this emerging field of nanotechnology”.

Then in September 1999 the IWGN Workshop Report, Nanotechnology Research Directions, was released with a “Vision for Nanotechnology Research and Development in the Next Decade”.  Nanotechnology will fundamentally change the way materials and devices will be produced in the future.

At this point, in the year 2000, most people didn’t know much about nanotechnology, there was only a small core of scientists and engineers. In recent years new breeds of microscopes made it possible to control the movement of atoms. [2]

The previous day, on January 20, 2000 President Clinton acknowledged National Biotechnology month.

Exactly 20 years later, to the day, the US reported their first SARS-CoV-2 patient, and the day before, China confirms human-to-human transmission.  The “coronavirus pandemic” allowed both bio-technology (mRNA) and nano-technology (lipid nanoparticles (LNP)) to converge into a new technology “vaccine” used for the first time and en-masse, on a large percentage of the worlds population.

The idea of the Earth Charter originated in 1987 from the recommendations in “Our Common Future” document, when the United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development called for a new charter to guide the transition to sustainable development. [1]

The drafting of the Earth Charter text was done during a six-year worldwide consultation process (1994-2000), overseen by the independent Earth Charter Commission, which was convened by Martin Strong and Mikhail Gorbachev with the purpose of developing a global consensus on values and principles for a sustainable future. It was approved at a meeting at the UNESCO headquarters in Paris in March 12-14, 2000, it contains a preamble, 16 main principles, sixty-one supporting principles, and a conclusion entitled “The Way Forward.” [5]

The document was justified as a “five year review of the implementation of Agenda 21 demonstrated, so far the world has failed to take the new course towards sustainable development.”

The Preamble affirms that “we are one human family and one Earth community with a common destiny,” and the Earth Charter encourages all people to recognize their shared responsibility, each according to his or her situation and capacity, for the well-being of the whole human family, the greater community of life, and future generations. [2, 3]

“The Earth Charter Commission member who presided over the unveiling just happened to be none other than Steven C. Rockefeller.” [4]

In September 2000 FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) began to regulate the emerging market of human gene therapy products, which fall under the legal definition of a “biologic”.

Gene therapy research was 10 years old by this date.  The first clinical trial of a genetic therapy occurred on September 14, 1990, on a 4-year-old girl named Ashanthi DeSilva. She survived.  But then in September 1999, 18 year old Jesse Gelsinger died from a reaction to his experimental gene therapy treatment, which spurred and investigation that revealed not all trial adverse events were being reported. [1, 2]

It was reported that that since 1989 to September 2000, the FDA had “received about 300 requests from medical researchers and manufacturers to study gene therapy and to develop gene therapy products”, looking to find cures for genetic diseases. [3, 4]

The United Nations Millennium Declaration was signed on September 8, 2000 by all 191 UN member states, agreeing to try to achieve Eight Millennium Development Goals (MDG) by the end of the year 2015. [1, 2]

The Eight Millennium Development Goals were to:

1. eradicate extreme poverty and hunger;
2. achieve universal primary education;
3. promote gender equality and empower women;
4. reduce child mortality;
5. improve maternal health;
6. combat HIV/AIDS, malaria, and other diseases;
7. ensure environmental sustainability; and
8. develop a global partnership for development.

“The MDGs are inter-dependent; all the MDG influence health, and health influences all the MDGs”.

UN released an assessment report in 2012 which revealed “the poorest and those disadvantaged because of gender, age, disability or ethnicity are often bypassed.” The follow up UN agenda for 2030 focus not only on edadicating “extreme poverty” which it didn’t achive, but to eradicate ALL poverty.

The Dark Winter [7] bio-terroism exercise was held at Andrews Air Force Base in Washington, DC, on June 22-23, 2001.  The exercise portrayed a fictional scenario designed to simulate possible US reaction to the deliberate introduction of smallpox in three states during the winter of 2002.  It was supported by the Johns Hopkins Center for Civilian Biodefense Studies together with the Oklahoma City National Memorial Institute for Prevention Terrorism, the Center for Strategic and International Studies and the ANSER Institute for Homeland Security. [1, 2, 3, 5]

Health and Human Services assistant secretary for preparedness and response, Robert Kadlec, participated in the script writing and came up with the name Dark Winter, a reference to the outcome with a lack of vaccines. [4]

In the scenario, the “participants in Dark Winter, representing the National Security Council, quickly deduce that smallpox has been deliberately introduced and that this is the result of a “bioterrorist attack on the United States.” The assumption is made that the attack is “related to decisions we may make to deploy troops to the Mid-East.” – remember this is prior to 9/11! [6]

As part of the scenario, “mainstream media outlets…were sent anonymous letters that threatened renewed attacks on the U.S., including anthrax attacks, if the U.S. did not withdraw its troops from the Middle East.”

“[T]he operation showed how quickly a public health disaster could lead to widespread chaos and social collapse.”

On September 18, 2001, just days after the September 11 terrorist attack, anonymous letters laced with bacterial spores of Bacillus anthracis aka Anthrax, were mailed to media companies and congressional offices. The “anthrax letters killed five people and sickened 17”.  This type of bioterrorism attack was simulated just months before in June 2001, and game-played using letters – it was called Dark Winter.

The crime was investigated by the FBI et al for 7 years and on February 19, 2010 concluded that Dr. Bruce E. Ivins who worked at the at the United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID), worked alone and sent the letters.  In July 2008, Ivins was reported to have committed suicide. [1, 2, 3, 4]

Following this threat, the Clinton administration’s military were mandated to receive anthrax vaccines, to “protect troops against the use of anthrax as a biological weapon”, a practice which just months before in June 2001 the Department of Defense had halted! [5]

In 2003 Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ordered the 6-shot non-FDA approved, mandated anthrax vaccines to stop.  Many soldiers were injured by the vaccines, 85% of troops had reported some adverse reaction to the vaccine, this vaccination practice could explain the 1990’s Gulf War syndrome which had an alleged unknown cause! [10]  The CDC started recommending the shots in 1991, the vaccine was only FDA approved in 2005, some military refused to take it. [6, 7, 8, 9]

Just 45 days following the 9/11 terrorist attack, the Bush administration’s USA Patriot Act draft legislation was signed into law on October 26, 2001, “a law that significantly expanded the search and surveillance powers of federal law-enforcement and intelligence agencies.” [1, 2]

The 300 page document was ready to go so fast because Senator Joe Biden had written it in 1994 as the “Omnibus Counterterrorism Act of 1995” following the Oklahoma bombing, but it had been rejected up til then. [3, 4]

At the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, in January 26, 2003, Bill Gates announced a $200 million grant to establish the Grand Challenges in Global Health initiative, an effort in partnership with the non-profit Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Inc. (FNIH).  “The initiative will identify critical scientific challenges in global health and increase research on diseases that cause millions of deaths in the developing world.” [1, 2, 3, 6]

“The initiative will identify critical scientific challenges in global health and increase research on diseases that cause millions of deaths in the developing world.” The initiative is managed by the “global health experts at the FNIH, the BMGF, the CIHR, and the Wellcome Trust”

On the Scientific Board is Dr Anthony Fauci and a BMGF representative, who are “charged with identifying specific scientific or technological innovations that are likely to:

• Have a global impact
• Show high potential for feasibility
• Potentially remove a critical barrier to solving health problems”

In 2007, the Gates Foundation launched Grand Challenges Explorations, a small scale funding initiative to “engage more of the world’s innovators more quickly.” [4]

The initiative was relaunched on October 7, 2014 as the Global Grand Challenges, to expand to “a family of initiatives fostering innovation to solve key global health and development problems” [5]

“Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is a viral respiratory illness caused by a coronavirus, called SARS-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV) [10]. According to the CDC, SARS began in February 2003, it wasn’t until March that the WHO backdated it til the “end of February 2003.   According to WHO February 2003 Weekly Epidemiological Reports (WERs) [12] they mention reports of atypical pheumonia in China but Chinese officials designated the cause as chlamydia pneumoniae, which was found in 2 patients who died. [11]

WHO records from November 2002 to February 2003 reveal people in the southern Chinese province of Guangdong started to become ill from atypical pneumonia, China played down the illness. [1, 2, 3, 4]

On March 16, 2003 the WHO had released their website with the Case Definition as reported, the first recognized case was from Hanoi, Vietnam dated mid-February – not China.   At a March 25, 2003 WHO press conference it was claimed they were 10 days into an outbreak, making the official start of the SARS outbreak on March 15, 2003.

A novel coronavirus was discovered through complete viral genome sequence  and was characterised as SARS-CoV and published by May 30, 2003.

The illness spread to more than two dozen countries in North America, South America, Europe, and Asia before the SARS global outbreak of 2003 was contained

Contact with a doctor from China is said to have “seeded” the SARS pandemic with a 10% mortality rate.  The virus origin is unknown. [9]

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), a total of 8,098 people worldwide became sick with SARS during the 2003 outbreak. Of these, 774 died.  The US had 8 confirmed infections.  [5, 6, 7, 8] Since 2004, there has been no known SARS transmission anywhere in the world.  

Dr David Martin, stated that the WHO declared SARS eradicated in 2008, but I was unable to find a reference, though interestingly in October 2019 the question about SARS eradication was asked.

Coronaviruses were mostly known for causing common colds. “The SARS outbreak was a game changer,” says Linfa Wang, formally of CSIRO Australia, it caused coronaviruses to now receive global “public health” attention and research funding.

SARS timeline >>>

The International Declaration on Human Genetic Data (2003) was adopted unanimously and by acclamation at the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization’s (UNESCO) 32nd General Conference on 16 October 2003.  This document began several years before the Human Genome Project drew to an end. [1, 2]

With the rapidly developing field of genomic research and increasing speed with which to sequence genomes, many people fear that human genetic data will be used for purposes contrary to human rights and freedom. Governments, non-governmental organizations, the intellectual community and society in general are calling for guidelines at the international level.

This Declaration and the Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights (1997) are the only international points of reference in the field of biological-ethics.

In December 20, 2003 the Australian and New Zealand Governments signed a treaty to establish a single, bi-national agency to regulate therapeutic products, including medical devices and prescription, over-the-counter and complementary medicines, as part of “Globalisation and the way “Towards a harmonised regulatory pathway”. [2, 3, 4]

“Harmonisation of therapeutic products regulation is a relatively recent development, but there are ongoing activities at both the global and regional levels, as well as numerous formal and informal bilateral arrangements. For example, a number of states have chosen to recognise approvals by the United States FDA, either de jure, through a formal agreement, or de facto“.

“The single agency, which will replace the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) and the New Zealand Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Authority (Medsafe), will be accountable to both the Australian and New Zealand Governments. It is expected that the same regulation in force in Australia will also apply to New Zealand as per the amended law.” [1]

If the bi-national regulator is “implemented, the joint agency could serve as a model that would usefully inform initiatives in other jurisdictions”.  On January 12, 2012 the “Australia New Zealand Therapeutic Products Agency (ANZTPA)” had their “first meeting” following June 20, 2011 agreement to proceed, and completed a “harmonisation activity”.  But on November 20, 2014 the Oceania Regulator ANZTPA was officially scrapped. [5]

Harmonisation is still alive. The FDA is a founding member of International Conference on Harmonisation, on March 26, 2020 encouraged the “pharmaceutical regulatory authorities globally” to implement the ICH Guidelines to achieve International Regulatory Harmonization.

On September 29, 2004 a “One World, One Health” symposium organized by the Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) [3, 4] was held at The Rockefeller University, and was followed by many other workshops, to bring into plan One Health.

Health experts “focused on the current and potential movements of diseases among human, domestic animal, and wildlife populations.” They state “A broader understanding of health and disease demands a unity of approach achievable only through a consilience of human, domestic animal and wildlife health” what they call One Health. [1]

“Phenomena such as species loss, habitat degradation, pollution, invasive alien species, and global climate change are fundamentally altering life on our planet from terrestrial wilderness and ocean depths to the most densely populated cities. The rise of emerging and resurging infectious diseases threatens not only humans (and their food supplies and economies), but also the fauna and flora comprising the critically needed biodiversity that supports the living infrastructure of our world”

William H. Foege, a Fellow at the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation gave the Keynote Speech:  “One World, One Health, Could We Muddle Through?” and Dr. Steven Sanderson, a Political Scientist [7] who was President & Chief Executive Officer of the Wildlife Conservation Society in Bronx, NY, Introduced the Manhattan Principles on “One World, One Health” written by Robert A. Cook, William B. Karesh, and Steven A. Osofsky. [2]

The Manhattan Principles “lists 12 recommendations (see below) for establishing a more holistic approach to preventing epidemic / epizootic disease and for maintaining ecosystem integrity for the benefit of humans, their domesticated animals, and the foundational biodiversity that supports us all.” [6]

• Dr Karesh became Executive VP for Health and Policy for EcoHealth Alliance and the WHO’s IHR roster (in case of a public health emergency) as well CFR and other influential organisations and is quoted as coining the term “One Health” in 2003.
• Dr Osofsky launched and managed some of the first major applied One Health global programs, [5] which WCS expressed as an “exciting societal ‘tipping point’ toward ‘One Health’ thinking” – the  One World, One Health™ approach.

In November 2004 the United Kingdom treasury and France announce their commitment to launch an International Finance Facility for Immunisation (IFFIm) – a pilot that would apply the principles of the broader IFF on a smaller scale to the immunisation sector.  The International Finance Facility (IFF) starting January 2003, was inspired to provide development assistance funds for the United Nations 2015 Millennium Development Goals (MDG) to end global poverty. [1]

In his speech in May 2005 addressing the World Health Assembly, Bill Gates mentioned the International Financing Facility for Immunizations which was “[p]roposed by the United Kingdom, with support pledged by France, Germany, Sweden, and Italy.”  Gates went on to say that “this initiative would provide developing countries with the reliable funding they need, year after year, to buy vaccines, which gives the private sector the market incentive to make them and deliver them. Market forces will work for poor people only if governments put up the funds to create a market.”

IFFIm is a international development institution and vital component of GAVI’s capital structure.  The IFFIm is designed to accelerate the availability of funds to be used for health and immunisation programmes through the GAVI Alliance (GAVI) in 70 of the poorest countries around the world.  The IFFIm is ran by the World Bank [2, 3, 4]

In November 7, 2006 the IFFIm launch their inaugural Vaccine Bonds, their means for raising capital and being able to provide consistent and predictable finance for GAVI to fund their vaccine programs. [1]

On December 13, 2004 the first U.S. SARS vaccine trial began at NIH, tested in 10 healthy volunteers to be followed up for 32 weeks (appox. 8 months) [1]

Stated in a press release ““The Vaccine Research Center, a cutting-edge facility established here at NIH just five years ago, encompasses the entire spectrum of vaccine development from basic research to clinical testing,” says NIH Director Elias A. Zerhouni, M.D. “This is why our team at NIAID has been able to develop this vaccine at an unprecedented pace, using technological discoveries that were not available just a few short years ago.”

Dr Anthony Fauci stated: “Instead of using weakened or inactivated virus, which is typical for vaccine development, the new vaccine is composed of a small circular piece of DNA [plasmids] that encodes the viral spike protein. Scientists modified the DNA to minimize the risk of it combining with the SARS virus or other viruses of the SARS type, called coronaviruses….Scientists expect that the DNA will direct human cells to produce proteins very similar to the SARS spike protein. The immune system should recognize these proteins as foreign and then mount a defense against them. If the vaccinated person ever encounters the actual SARS virus, his or her immune system will be primed to neutralize it.”

By April 2003, NIAID-funded researchers in Hong Kong were the first to show that SARS is a viral disease. They soon proved that a newly emerging coronavirus causes SARS. By May, an international collaboration of researchers had decoded the genetic sequence of the SARS coronavirus, opening many avenues of research to develop diagnostic tests, therapies and vaccines.“

Atlantic Storm, a bioterrorism “table-top” simulation based on a scenario 0f a smallpox outbreak, was convened on January 14, 2005 and organized by the Center for Biosecurity of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), the Center for Transatlantic Relations of the Johns Hopkins University (JHU), and the Transatlantic Biosecurity Network.

The event was sponsored by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the German Marshall Fund of the United States, and the Nuclear Threat Initiative. [1, 2, 3]

“Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP) arose as part of the December 30, 2005 Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act), and “was pushed through to shield drug companies from lawsuits over products like the anthrax and smallpox vaccines, which had a relatively high rate of dangerous side effects.” [1, 2]

CICP “has just four employees and few hallmarks of an ordinary court. Decisions are made in secret by government officials, claimants can’t appeal to a judge and payments in most death cases are capped at $370,376.” – this court was “created by a 2005 law specifically to deal with vaccines developed under emergency authorization.” [3, 4, 5, 6]

On March 21, 2006 Jack Dorsey, an engineer at Odeo, sent the first-ever tweet from @Jack (“just setting up my twttr”). Four month later on July 15, 2006 the San Francisco-based podcasting company Odeo officially released Twttr to the public, and within 6 months changes it’s name to Twitter. [1, 2]

Twitter was founded by Evan Williams, Jack Dorsey, Noah Glass, Biz Stone. It began as a short messaging service (SMS) for groups, starting with a founder-imposed 140-character limit, which later extended to 280 characters. [3]

In March 2007 the platform used the South by Southwest convention in Texas to “catapult itself into the limelight”, at that time “more than 60,000 tweets were sent per day”. [4]

In September 13, 2013 Twitter tweeted, that they had filed with the SEC to go public, and on November 7, 2013 they officially became a publicly traded company opening at $45.10/share, a value of $31 billion with around 200 million users.

Twitter’s “prominence rose” with the election campaign of President Donald Trump in 2016, he used the platform to get messages to the people which the “fake news” media and “fact checkers” refused to cover without bias. [9, 10, 11]  On January 8, 2021 Twitter decided to permanent suspend President Trump’s official account claiming he incited violence.

At the beginning of 2016 Twitter employed 3,900 people and the platform has 500 million tweets sent each day [5], with 310 million users, the user base grew to 330 million by 2018 end [6]. In Q1 2019, Twitter changed its account reporting method to ‘Monetizable Daily Active Users’ (mDAUs). [8]

By year end 2019 the platform had 152 million mDAUs and 2021 yr end 217 million. In 2021 391 million accounts have no followers at all! [7]   The “platform hit its peak in Q1 2018 when it clocked in 336 million monthly active users” and declined there after, allegedly due to removing bot accounts.

On October 27, 2022 Elon Musk buys out all of Twitter for $54.20 per share, a takeover that was announced on April 25, 2022.  Musk’s objective to make Twitter the “common digital town square” and bring back free speech.

On August 21, 2006 the University of Pennsylvania (UPenn) filed a patent titled “RNA containing modified nucleosides and methods of use thereof“, on behalf of the two “inventors” Katalin Kariko and Drew Weissman.   On October 2, 2012 the patent application was granted.

The patent is, in part, for the used of “pseudouridine” in create a synthetic mRNA code, which help’s the mRNA evade immune detection and last longer than natural mRNA

In 2007, the companies mRNA RiboTherapeutics Inc. and CellScript LLC. were established, both connected to Gary Dahl, the director and CEO respectively.  mRNA RiboTherapeutics has an exclusive license to the patent from the Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania. That patent was then sublicensed to CellScript. [2, 3, 4, 5]

In 2017, CellScript signed a “Patent Sublicense Agreement” with Moderna on Jun 26, 2017 and the next month mRNA RiboTherapeutics signed one on July 14, 2017 with BioNTech.

CellScript, who supplies the modified mRNA [with minimal safety data], went from $7.4M in revenue in 2019 to just under $50M in 2020.  Moderna was to pay “a non-refundable, non-creditable sublicense fee of twenty-two million U.S. dollars ($22,000,000)” by an undisclosed date in 2019, though BioNTech’s fees & royalties are not disclosed.

From October 16 to 19, 2006 Australia held a pandemic influenza live simulation called Exercise Cumpston’ 06, the largest ever health exercise and said to be one of the first major exercises on pandemic influenza conducted in any country, costing $4.1 million. [1, 2, 3]

The simulation was conducted by the Department of Health and Ageing with the aim to exercise the capacity and capability of the Australian health system to prevent, detect and respond to an influenza pandemic, it utilised 1,500 participants and control staff and was held over 4 days.  The exercise was closely observed and monitored by international health experts. [4]

• The exercise was named after Dr John Howard Lidgett Cumpston, an epidemiologist, and the first Director-General of the Commonwealth Department of Health, from 1921 to 1945. Previously, as the Commonwealth Director of Quarantine, he was largely responsible for containing the spread of Spanish Influenza in Australia in 1919.

It’s not the first simulation as Exercise Eleusis ’05 was conducted in November 2005, simulating an avian influenza outbreak in poultry with limited transmission to humans.

Both exercises showed Australia was in good shape, with some refinements recommended including updating the 2003 version of the Australian Health Management Plan for Pandemic Influenza (AHMPPI) using undated evidence.

Wikileaks was founded in 2006 by Australian computer programmer and activist Julian Assange, it’s first scoop was posted on the website on December 29, 2006. [1, 2, 3]

Wikileaks is a multi-national, award winning, media organization and whistleblower platform that specializes in the analysis and publication of large datasets of censored or otherwise leaked restricted official materials involving war, spying and corruption.  There are many mirrored sites in various countries.

“We believe that transparency in government activities leads to reduced corruption, better government and stronger democracies.”

WikiLeaks received its first batch of sensitive documents not from a whistleblower but from The Onion Router (Tor), an encryption network designed to allow users to transmit data anonymously. By early 2007 Wikileaks had “received over 1.2 million documents so far from dissident communities and anonymous sources.”

Wikileaks has helped to reveal the level of corruption in the world:  Climategate, Hillary’s private and DNC emails, John Podesta emails, Guantánamo Bay, wars, CIA, chlorine dioxide, Vault 7, and so much more.

On February 1, 2007 the US Health & Human Services released a Community Mitigation Guidance report for “Early, Targeted, Layered Use of Nonpharmaceutical Interventions” (NPIs).  This report introduced, for the first time, a Pandemic Severity Index (PSI) in which the case fatality ratio (CFR) (the proportion of deaths among clinically ill persons) serves as the critical driver for categorizing the severity of a pandemic. [1]

NPI’s of isolation and quarantine were promoted  as “voluntary”.   Teleworking was promoted – as online was still ramping up.

The CFR is “a single criterion that will likely be known even early in a pandemic when small clusters and outbreak are occurring”, such as was known for COVID-19 in February 2020. [2]

The World Health Assembly adopted revised International Health Regulations (2005) (IHR) on 23 May 2005,  and it went into force on June 15, 2007 for all 194 member states who signed. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

“This international legal instrument governs the role of the World Health Organization (WHO) and its member countries, including the United States, in identifying, responding to, and sharing information about events that might constitute a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC). A PHEIC is an extraordinary event that constitutes a public health risk to other countries through international spread of disease and potentially requires a coordinated international response. All WHO member countries are required to notify WHO of a potential PHEIC. WHO makes the final determination about the existence of a PHEIC.” [6]

“The purpose and scope of the IHR (2005) are to prevent, protect against, control and provide a public health response to the international spread of disease in ways that are commensurate with and restricted to public health risks, and which avoid unnecessary interference with international traffic and trade. The IHR (2005) provide a framework for WHO epidemic alert and rapid response activities already being implemented in collaboration with countries to control international outbreaks and to strengthen international public health security.”

History of IHR (2005) – HERE

In response to a struggling housing market, the Federal Market Open Committee (FMOC) began lowering the fed funds rate, dropping to 3.5% on January 22, 2008, then to 3.0% a week later, hoping to restore demand. This marked the start of the 2008 financial crisis, the worst economic disaster since the Great Depression of 1929. [1]

It reached a climax with the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers on September 14, 2008, and the subsequent international banking crisis.

On October 25, 2008, representatives from more than 120 countries and 26 international and regional organizations attended the 2008 International Ministerial Conference on Avian and Pandemic Influenza in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt. During this meeting, “Contributing to One World, One Health™ – A Strategic Framework for Reducing Risks of Infectious Diseases at the Animal-Human-Ecosystems Interface” was officially released. [1]

The document was put together based on recommendations of the 2007 International Ministerial Conference on Avian and Pandemic Influenza in New Delhi where FAO , OIE , WHO , UNICEF , the World Bank, and the United Nations System Influenza Coordination (UNSIC), said to be “built on the lessons learned from the highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza response during the early 2000’s and presented a strategy for applying the One Health concept to emerging infectious diseases at the animal-human-ecosystem interface.” [2, 3]

On June 11, 2009, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the novel influenza A (H1N1) virus (called Swine Flu) had reached Phase 6 of their April 2009 (updated from 2005) version of the pandemic influenza preparedness and response, PIP guidelines.  Phase 6 was a designation that indicated a global pandemic was underway, justified as a new virus spreading beyond 2 countires and highlighted the “need to implement resonse and mitigation efforts”. [1, 2, 3]

0n April 29, 2009 the WHO reported a new H1N1 influenza virus had emerged in 9 countries and spread to 74 by June 11, 2009, thus triggering the first global flu pandemic in 40 years.  On June 11, 2009, the WHO Director General Dr Margaret Chan declared  “the world is now at the start of the 2009 influenza pandemic.”  Except the virus was milder than a normal influenza outbreak, and a month earlier (May 6, 2009) the WHO changed the  definition of what criteria constitute “a pandemic“! [1, 2, 3]

There was a big push for a fast-tracked vaccine, and 4 months after the declared pandemic, in October 2009 the vaccines rolled out, with manufacturers indemnified! Depending on the countries regulator, clinical trials were either 4 weeks in a few people or not required at all “as many clinical trials were done with similar annual vaccine preparation, and the assumption is that the new pandemic vaccine will behave similarly,” thus shortening the timeline of for approval. [11]

England had ordered 132 million doses before there was any trial data. Only 6 million people, mainly pregnant women and children took the vaccine.  The US CDC in July 2009 stopped testing, and said to diagnose “probable” or “presumed” as H1N1, thus exaggerating cases, but also advised recovered patients to “go ahead and get vaccinated anyway”. [5, 6]

In August 2010, a few months into vaccine roll out Finland, Sweden and Iceland identified a problem in children and adolescents who developed narcolepsy. [4, 7]  In February 8, 2011 the WHO reported 12 countries with narcolepsy cases, but advised to vaccinate anyway as it appears to be associated with only GSK Pandemrix vaccine and not a “general worldwide phenomenon”. The vaccine was also attributed to febrile convulsions and miscarriage.

It took until 2013 before public health England acknowledged they had a narcolepsy problem too, and only 11 years later, in 2020 did public health England published more data that says in retrospect it was worse than we thought! [3, 8, 9, 10]

On August 10, 2010 the WHO declares an end to 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic. [12]

• In 2009 the Australian Health Management Plan for Pandemic Influenza (AHMPPI) of 2008 was used to guide Australia’s response to the H1N1 pandemic.  The AHMPPI was review in 2019, but was ignored for the COVID-19 coronavirus (respiratory virus) pandemic.  “Australia had been in the pandemic “ALERT” phase since 2005 following the emergence of the avian influenza A(H5N1) virus infection in humans.” [14] Which curiously Australia’s first Australian Action Plan for Pandemic Influenza was released Oct 2003. [13]

“The word pandemic refers to how widely dispersed a disease is, not to how severe the disease is,”… the definition of the word is “not set in stone.” said David Ozonoff, professor of environmental health at the Boston University School of Public Health, May 2009. [14]

CDC timeline >>>

October 2009, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) launched the Emerging Pandemic Threats program (EPT-1), a 5-year program targeting “the early detection of new disease threats; enhanced ‘national-level’ preparedness and response capacities for their effective control; and a reduction in the risk of disease emergence by minimizing those practices and behaviors that trigger the ‘spill-over and spread’ of new pathogens from animal reservoirs to humans.” [1, 2]

This effort “grew out of a recognition that we are now in an era of new, re-emerging and recurring global health threats that argue for a longer-term, more strategic approach to global health security.”

“EPT-1 and Avian Influenza work has been focused on building those capacities and expanding the evidence base that contributes to mitigating the impact of novel “high consequence pathogens” arising from animals.”

In 2014 EPT-2 was born which “will also make major contributions to the Global Health Security Agenda to more effectively address threats posed by the natural emergence of new disease threats, as well as the intentional and/or accidental release of dangerous pathogens.”

Thousands of emails, from the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit (CRU) were released on a server in the city of Tomsk in Siberia, Russia [19, 20, 21] on November 19, 2009, just before the Copenhagen Summit on Global Warming [8, 23, 24, 25]; the email scandal was coined Climategate first by James Delingpole. [1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, 14, 22]

CRU, who’s director is Professor Philip Jones, is recognised as one of the world’s leading institutions concerned with the study of natural and anthropogenic [man-made] climate change, they keep “the global temperature record used to monitor the state of the climate system, as well as statistical software packages and climate models.”  They are a “small group of scientists who have for years been more influential in driving the worldwide alarm over global warming than any others, not least through the role they play at the heart of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).” [26]

“[h]undreds of internal emails written by scientists working at the CRU were obtained by a hacker [or whistleblower] and posted on the internet, some of which appeared to show that researchers had deliberately faked evidence of global warming by manipulating statistics” as climate warming was inconveniently lacking evidence. [8, 18]

“Researchers at CRU, one of the world’s leading research bodies on natural and human-induced climate change, played a key role in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report, which is considered to be the most authoritative report of its kind” [15, 16]

On November 29, 2009 the CRU scientists were “forced to admit they had thrown away most of the raw data that their global temperature calculations were based upon”  which means “other academics are not able to check basic calculations said to show a long-term rise in temperature over the past 150 years.” [17]  The Climategate scientists who conspired to delete emails, escaped criminal conviction on a “statute of limitations” technicality.

“The documents and emails illustrated how prominent climatologists, affiliated with the UN’s International Panel on Climate Change [IPCC], embarked on a venomous and coordinated campaign to ostracize climate skeptics and use their influence to keep dissenting reports from appearing in peer-reviewed journals, as well as using cronyism to avoid compliance with Freedom of Information Act requests”

As reported, 2009 is when “Global Warming” become known as “Climate Change”! [5, 10, 11, 12, 13]
By 2010 when no warming has occurred for 15 years, Obama science advisor wanted to dump the term “global warming” for “global climate disruption“!

Why does IPCC always quote a temperature variation around a zero point?
What average global temperature does that zero point represent, 14 or 15 degrees C?

On the back of these “man-made” Climate Change claims, they also claim that human disease incidence is on the rise!

Climategate WATCH, NOTES
CNN version of Climategate: PART 1, PART 2, PART 3
Australian Bolt Report on Climate Science – 2011

At the WEF in Davos on January 29, 2010 Bill and Melinda Gates pledged their foundation would commit $10 billion over the next 10 years to help research, develop and deliver vaccines for the world’s poorest countries. And so the Decade of Vaccines (DOV) was “born”. [5, 6]

“Increased vaccination could save more than 8 million children by 2020; significant funding gaps remain,
others must join the effort.”…“We must make this the decade of vaccines,”  said Bill Gates.

“The Gates Foundation’s commitment to vaccines is unprecedented, but just a small part of what is needed. It’s absolutely crucial that both governments and the private sector step up efforts to provide life-saving vaccines to children who need them most.” said WHO Director-General Margaret Chan

On April 2010 three international orgaisations FAO, OIE & WHO released  A Tripartite Concept Note document which “sets a strategic direction for FAO-OIE-WHO to take together and proposes a long term basis for international collaboration aimed at coordinating global activities to address health risks at the human-animal- ecosystems interfaces.” [1]

• Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
• World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH, founded as OIE)
• World Health Organization (WHO)

“The emergence of new or the re-emergence of existing animal diseases, including zoonoses, the growing threat of transboundary animal
diseases, the impact of environmental changes and globalization, as well as new societal demands related to food security, food safety, public health and animal welfare, emphasize the critical need for collaboration between the three organizations.”  This builds the foundation for One Health.

• “In February 2021, the three organizations called on the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) to join the Tripartite, reaffirming the importance of the environmental dimension of the One Health collaboration”
• On October 14, 2022 the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) joined to become The Quadripartite Organizations

On June 22, 2010, Shi Zhengli from the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China along with other authors including two from Australia’s CSIRO in Geelong, Victoria, published the study “Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) proteins of different bat species confer variable susceptibility to SARS-CoV entry” which called for the “continuation and expansion of field surveillance studies among different bat populations” as “bats could be the natural reservoir of SARS-CoV” with 2 species in particular.

They looked at 7 additional bat species and “tested their interactions with human SARS-CoV spike protein using both HIV-based pseudotype and live SARS-CoV infection assays. …Further, the alteration of several key residues either decreased or enhanced bat ACE2 receptor efficiency.”

It was stated “[c]himeric ACE2 was constructed by combining the N-terminal region of bat ACE2 with the C-terminal portion of human ACE2″… to see if SARS-CoV that infects human cells could infect bat cells via ACE2 receptors.

The 2019 SARS-CoV-2 genome was said to have HIV insertions.  Could this have resulted from continuation of this chimeric work? [1, 2]

In a press release September 21, 2010 the “Wildlife Trust”, a non-profit international conservation organization founded in 1971, and stated to be “dedicated to protecting wildlife and safeguarding human and animal health”, announced that the organization will be re-branded with a new name and tagline: EcoHealth Alliance, “Local Conservation, Global Health.” [1, 2]

Dr. Peter Daszak, president of EcoHealth Alliance said

“Building on our strong history, we have grown beyond our original conservation focus to become the central organization defining the intersection of local conservation and global health…A leader in the One Health movement which began in 2004, EcoHealth Alliance is on the forefront of informing the public, businesses, and the scientific community about emerging diseases, including potential pandemics.” [3]

Through The Intercept FOI requests over $95 million of EcoHealth Alliance funding comes from USAID and US Department of Defence into potential “bioweapons” research. [4, 5]

EcoHealth Alliance is in the center of tracking and cataloguing animal viruse genetic sequences and providing finance to laboratories for Gain-of-Function/Dual Use research.

The CDC/FDA post marketing safety surveillance system known as the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) is where doctors are supposed to report post vaccination injury, most don’t even know it exists, and many doctors don’t recognise or acknowledge vaccine injury.

Harvard Medical School was hired by US HHS’s Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and paid $1 million to investigate the efficiency of the VAERS reporting system, and determine if the system could be automated. Their last assessment period data point captured September 30, 2010. The Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, 3-year long Study which was released end 2010/early 2011 revealed the incredible under reporting of an alleged “safety” system in that “fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported“.  They also found that advers events following vaccination was “much higher than the “1 in a million” frequently spouted by the medical community”. [1, 3, 6]

The Harvard “developers asked the CDC to take the final step of linking VAERS and the Vaccine Safety Datalink with the Harvard Pilgrim system so that these reports could be automatically transmitted into VAERS.”  The “CDC refused to cooperate to finalize the system after realizing that automating VAERS revealed a high rate of adverse events after vaccination” [6]

Stunningly, and without any reason, in January 2011 the CDC decided that it would only published (make public) the initial reports into VAERS and would no longer publish updates.  It is now known that they many initial reports, during the COVID-19 era have not been published.  So the degree of death and morbidity following immunizations is completely unknown and secret. [2]

The COVID-19 vaccines had more VAERS reports than all vaccines ever reported, and tens of thousands of deaths, all of which is underreported and the CDC/FDA still does nothing to fix the system or stop the CV-19 jabs! [4, 5]

As a progression from “It’s Time Campaign”, 14 scientists, led by Peter Hale, together with “advocacy experts” launch the Foundation for Vaccine Research incorporated in Washington DC on June 1, 2011.  The aim of the foundation is “to create global awareness for the need for increased, flexible, long-term funding for vaccine research”. [1, 2]

On September 16, 2011, Richard Resnick in his TED talk revealed that genome sequencing is now so cheap and fast it will open up opportunities for personalised genome sequencing for health care, insurance and politics!

“Now what we do is we take a genome, we make maybe 50 copies of it, we cut all those copies up into little 50-base reads, and then we sequence them, massively parallel. And then we bring that into software, and we reassemble it, and we tell you what the story is.”

The Human Genome Project sequenced 3 gigabases which took 15 years, now one run on a modern machine can process 200 gigabases in a week, and that capacity is increasing and now the price of sequencing a base has fallen 100 million times!

With a world wide capacity to sequence human genomes is 50-100 thousand per year, in 2011 and the one lab that represents 20% of all the global capacity is the Bejing Genomics Institute (BGI) in China.

[BGI provided 10 million COVID-19 PCR test kits to Australia.  It is known that the Chinese are building a DNA profiling database for genomic surveillance, which is of great concern for Australians.]

There is still much to learn about the human genome and genetic material.  In March 2022 the first complete, gapless sequence of a human genome revealed there are hidden regions! “These unresolved regions include segmental duplications, ribosomal rRNA gene arrays, and satellite arrays that harbor unexplored variation of unknown consequence” [1]

The International Severe Acute Respiratory Infection Consortium (ISARIC) was launched on December 16, 2011, and is a group of international organisations taking part in a new global consortium organized to prepare clinical research for future influenza pandemics or other rapidly emerging public health threats.

Infectious outbreaks are not limited only to influenza outbreaks but are global phenomena that are occurring with increasing frequency.

The standardized and open-access protocols developed during this consortium will allow researchers from all participating countries to work with, adapt and evolve common clinical case ascertainment. This will ensure that high-quality and comparable clinical research is practiced on a global scale.

As part of The Global Health Network (TGHN) also funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, ISARIC has “an overreaching ambition to change the way in which research is carried out during and between epidemics, ISARIC aims to address the social and ethical issues related to this paradigm change.”

The ISARIC is being launched by the Wellcome Trust, and the UK Medical Research Council, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Inserm, Li Ka Shing Oxford Global Health Programme and the Singapore Ministry of Health.

On January 27, 2012 it was published that the influenza virus research community implemented a 60-day voluntary moratorium on “gain-of-function” experiments related to “highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 viruses leading to the generation of viruses that are more transmissible in mammals.”

On October 9, 2012 Anthony Fauci, director of  NIAID, and as a key funder of Influenza research, publishes “The Way Forward” for this kind of gain-of-function research. [1]

Fauci wrote “the benefits of such experiments and the resulting knowledge outweigh the risks. It is more likely that a pandemic would occur in nature, and the need to stay ahead of such a threat is a primary reason for performing an experiment that might appear to be risky.”

In 2011 the WHO and a group of partners developed a strategic document on vaccine safety called the Global Vaccine Safety Blueprint (GVSB) published February 22, 2012.  The Blueprint proposes a strategic plan for strengthening vaccine safety activities globally.  It focuses on building national capacity for vaccine safety in the world’s poorest countries through the coordinated efforts of major stakeholders. [1, 4]

Three months after the GVS Blueprint was published 94 Member States at the 65th World Health Assembly endorsed the Global Vaccine Action Plan (GVAP) serving as a framework to guide immunization efforts through to the end of 2020.

The Global Vaccine Safety Initiative (GVSI) was set up to implement the Blueprint strategy and to provide WHO and partners with a framework for enhancing vaccine pharmacovigilance, that is to better detect, report, and analyse adverse events.

The eight strategic objectives (1-4 pharmacovigilance, 5-8 regulatory system)

1. Adverse Event Following Immunisation (AEFI) detection
2. Investigation of safety signals
3. Vaccine safety communication
4. Tools and methods
5. Regulatory framework
6. Technical support and trainings
7. Global Analysis and response
8. Public-private information exchange

How it works: A Global Vaccine Safety Initiative (GVSI) meeting is a general meeting which guides the GVSI, who is the implementation mechanism for the Global Vaccine Safety Blueprint. [2, 3]

As of 2021 the GVS Blueprint is under review, which began December 2018 and again June 2019, in line with deploying the new plan, Immunization Agenda 2030 at the 73rd World Health Assembly in May 2020.  No longer will vaccines be focused be on the ” the world’s poorest countries” they intend to “leave no one behind”.

In the 2019 report a “emerging vaccine safety themes” concluded one was “vaccine hesitancy and misinformation” [pg26]