On February 1, 2007 the US Health & Human Services released a Community Mitigation Guidance report for “Early, Targeted, Layered Use of Nonpharmaceutical Interventions” (NPIs).  This report introduced, for the first time, a Pandemic Severity Index (PSI) in which the case fatality ratio (CFR) (the proportion of deaths among clinically ill persons) serves as the critical driver for categorizing the severity of a pandemic. [1]

NPI’s of isolation and quarantine were promoted  as “voluntary”.   Teleworking was promoted – as online was still ramping up.

The CFR is “a single criterion that will likely be known even early in a pandemic when small clusters and outbreak are occurring”, such as was known for COVID-19 in February 2020. [2]

The World Health Assembly adopted revised International Health Regulations (2005) (IHR) on 23 May 2005,  and it went into force on June 15, 2007 for all 194 member states who signed. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

“This international legal instrument governs the role of the World Health Organization (WHO) and its member countries, including the United States, in identifying, responding to, and sharing information about events that might constitute a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC). A PHEIC is an extraordinary event that constitutes a public health risk to other countries through international spread of disease and potentially requires a coordinated international response. All WHO member countries are required to notify WHO of a potential PHEIC. WHO makes the final determination about the existence of a PHEIC.” [6]

“The purpose and scope of the IHR (2005) are to prevent, protect against, control and provide a public health response to the international spread of disease in ways that are commensurate with and restricted to public health risks, and which avoid unnecessary interference with international traffic and trade. The IHR (2005) provide a framework for WHO epidemic alert and rapid response activities already being implemented in collaboration with countries to control international outbreaks and to strengthen international public health security.”

History of IHR (2005) – HERE

In response to a struggling housing market, the Federal Market Open Committee (FMOC) began lowering the fed funds rate, dropping to 3.5% on January 22, 2008, then to 3.0% a week later, hoping to restore demand. This marked the start of the 2008 financial crisis, the worst economic disaster since the Great Depression of 1929. [1]

It reached a climax with the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers on September 14, 2008, and the subsequent international banking crisis.

On October 25, 2008, representatives from more than 120 countries and 26 international and regional organizations attended the 2008 International Ministerial Conference on Avian and Pandemic Influenza in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt. During this meeting, “Contributing to One World, One Health™ – A Strategic Framework for Reducing Risks of Infectious Diseases at the Animal-Human-Ecosystems Interface” was officially released. [1]

The document was put together based on recommendations of the 2007 International Ministerial Conference on Avian and Pandemic Influenza in New Delhi where FAO , OIE , WHO , UNICEF , the World Bank, and the United Nations System Influenza Coordination (UNSIC), said to be “built on the lessons learned from the highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza response during the early 2000’s and presented a strategy for applying the One Health concept to emerging infectious diseases at the animal-human-ecosystem interface.” [2, 3]

On June 11, 2009 Margaret Chan, the World Health Organisations (WHO) director general declared a “seven-week-old outbreak” of the novel H1N1 influenza A virus a pandemic, “marking it as a historic global health event”…The virus came to world’s attention on April 21, when the CDC announced it had learned of two cases of a previously unknown strain of swine flu in Southern California.”. [16, 17]

Simultaneously, Chan said the WHO is advising the world’s makers of flu vaccines “quickly to prepare commercial-scale pandemic vaccine of this H1N1 virus,” which was called swine flu at first because it is thought to have emerged in pigs.

By this statge the outbreak has reached Phase 6 of their April 2009 version (updated from 2005) of their pandemic influenza preparedness and response, PIP guidelines.  Phase 6 was a designation that indicated a global pandemic was underway, justified as a new virus spreading beyond 2 countires and highlighted the “need to implement resonse and mitigation efforts”. [1, 2, 3]

0n April 29, 2009 the WHO reported a new H1N1 influenza virus had emerged in 9 countries and spread to 74 by June 11, 2009, thus triggering the first global flu pandemic in 40 years.  On June 11, 2009, the WHO Director General Dr Margaret Chan declared  “the world is now at the start of the 2009 influenza pandemic.”  Except the virus was milder than a normal influenza outbreak, and a month earlier (May 6, 2009) the WHO changed the  definition of what criteria constitute “a pandemic“! [1, 2, 3]

There was a big push for a fast-tracked vaccine, and 4 months after the declared pandemic, in October 2009 the vaccines rolled out, with manufacturers indemnified! Depending on the countries regulator, clinical trials were either 4 weeks in a few people or not required at all “as many clinical trials were done with similar annual vaccine preparation, and the assumption is that the new pandemic vaccine will behave similarly,” thus shortening the timeline of for approval. [11]

England had ordered 132 million doses before there was any trial data. Only 6 million people, mainly pregnant women and children took the vaccine.  The US CDC in July 2009 stopped testing, and said to diagnose “probable” or “presumed” as H1N1, thus exaggerating cases, but also advised recovered patients to “go ahead and get vaccinated anyway”. [5, 6]

In August 2010, a few months into vaccine roll out Finland, Sweden and Iceland identified a problem in children and adolescents who developed narcolepsy. [4, 7]  In February 8, 2011 the WHO reported 12 countries with narcolepsy cases, but advised to vaccinate anyway as it appears to be associated with only GSK Pandemrix vaccine and not a “general worldwide phenomenon”. The vaccine was also attributed to febrile convulsions and miscarriage.

It took until 2013 before public health England acknowledged they had a narcolepsy problem too, and only 11 years later, in 2020 did public health England published more data that says in retrospect it was worse than we thought! [3, 8, 9, 10]

On August 10, 2010 the WHO declares an end to 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic. [12]

• In 2009 the Australian Health Management Plan for Pandemic Influenza (AHMPPI) of 2008 was used to guide Australia’s response to the H1N1 pandemic.  The AHMPPI was review in 2019, but was ignored for the COVID-19 coronavirus (respiratory virus) pandemic.  “Australia had been in the pandemic “ALERT” phase since 2005 following the emergence of the avian influenza A(H5N1) virus infection in humans.” [14] Which curiously Australia’s first Australian Action Plan for Pandemic Influenza was released Oct 2003. [13]

“The word pandemic refers to how widely dispersed a disease is, not to how severe the disease is,”… the definition of the word is “not set in stone.” said David Ozonoff, professor of environmental health at the Boston University School of Public Health, May 2009. [14]

CDC timeline >>>

October 2009, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) launched the Emerging Pandemic Threats program (EPT-1), a 5-year program targeting “the early detection of new disease threats; enhanced ‘national-level’ preparedness and response capacities for their effective control; and a reduction in the risk of disease emergence by minimizing those practices and behaviors that trigger the ‘spill-over and spread’ of new pathogens from animal reservoirs to humans.” [1, 2]

This effort “grew out of a recognition that we are now in an era of new, re-emerging and recurring global health threats that argue for a longer-term, more strategic approach to global health security.”

“EPT-1 and Avian Influenza work has been focused on building those capacities and expanding the evidence base that contributes to mitigating the impact of novel “high consequence pathogens” arising from animals.”

In 2014 EPT-2 was born which “will also make major contributions to the Global Health Security Agenda to more effectively address threats posed by the natural emergence of new disease threats, as well as the intentional and/or accidental release of dangerous pathogens.”

Thousands of emails, from the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit (CRU) were released on a server in the city of Tomsk in Siberia, Russia [19, 20, 21] on November 19, 2009, just before the Copenhagen Summit on Global Warming [8, 23, 24, 25]; the email scandal was coined Climategate first by James Delingpole. [1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, 14, 22]

CRU, who’s director is Professor Philip Jones, is recognised as one of the world’s leading institutions concerned with the study of natural and anthropogenic [man-made] climate change, they keep “the global temperature record used to monitor the state of the climate system, as well as statistical software packages and climate models.”  They are a “small group of scientists who have for years been more influential in driving the worldwide alarm over global warming than any others, not least through the role they play at the heart of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).” [26]

“[h]undreds of internal emails written by scientists working at the CRU were obtained by a hacker [or whistleblower] and posted on the internet, some of which appeared to show that researchers had deliberately faked evidence of global warming by manipulating statistics” as climate warming was inconveniently lacking evidence. [8, 18]

“Researchers at CRU, one of the world’s leading research bodies on natural and human-induced climate change, played a key role in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report, which is considered to be the most authoritative report of its kind” [15, 16]

On November 29, 2009 the CRU scientists were “forced to admit they had thrown away most of the raw data that their global temperature calculations were based upon”  which means “other academics are not able to check basic calculations said to show a long-term rise in temperature over the past 150 years.” [17]  The Climategate scientists who conspired to delete emails, escaped criminal conviction on a “statute of limitations” technicality.

“The documents and emails illustrated how prominent climatologists, affiliated with the UN’s International Panel on Climate Change [IPCC], embarked on a venomous and coordinated campaign to ostracize climate skeptics and use their influence to keep dissenting reports from appearing in peer-reviewed journals, as well as using cronyism to avoid compliance with Freedom of Information Act requests”

As reported, 2009 is when “Global Warming” become known as “Climate Change”! [5, 10, 11, 12, 13]
By 2010 when no warming has occurred for 15 years, Obama science advisor wanted to dump the term “global warming” for “global climate disruption“!

Why does IPCC always quote a temperature variation around a zero point?
What average global temperature does that zero point represent, 14 or 15 degrees C?

On the back of these “man-made” Climate Change claims, they also claim that human disease incidence is on the rise!

Climategate WATCH, NOTES
CNN version of Climategate: PART 1, PART 2, PART 3
Australian Bolt Report on Climate Science – 2011

At the WEF in Davos on January 29, 2010 Bill and Melinda Gates pledged their foundation would commit $10 billion over the next 10 years to help research, develop and deliver vaccines for the world’s poorest countries. And so the Decade of Vaccines (DOV) was “born”. [5, 6]

“Increased vaccination could save more than 8 million children by 2020; significant funding gaps remain,
others must join the effort.”…“We must make this the decade of vaccines,”  said Bill Gates.

“The Gates Foundation’s commitment to vaccines is unprecedented, but just a small part of what is needed. It’s absolutely crucial that both governments and the private sector step up efforts to provide life-saving vaccines to children who need them most.” said WHO Director-General Margaret Chan

On April 2010 three international orgaisations FAO, OIE & WHO released  A Tripartite Concept Note document which “sets a strategic direction for FAO-OIE-WHO to take together and proposes a long term basis for international collaboration aimed at coordinating global activities to address health risks at the human-animal- ecosystems interfaces.” [1]

• Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
• World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH, founded as OIE)
• World Health Organization (WHO)

“The emergence of new or the re-emergence of existing animal diseases, including zoonoses, the growing threat of transboundary animal
diseases, the impact of environmental changes and globalization, as well as new societal demands related to food security, food safety, public health and animal welfare, emphasize the critical need for collaboration between the three organizations.”  This builds the foundation for One Health.

• “In February 2021, the three organizations called on the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) to join the Tripartite, reaffirming the importance of the environmental dimension of the One Health collaboration”
• On October 14, 2022 the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) joined to become The Quadripartite Organizations

On June 22, 2010, Shi Zhengli from the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China along with other authors including two from Australia’s CSIRO in Geelong, Victoria, published the study “Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) proteins of different bat species confer variable susceptibility to SARS-CoV entry” which called for the “continuation and expansion of field surveillance studies among different bat populations” as “bats could be the natural reservoir of SARS-CoV” with 2 species in particular.

They looked at 7 additional bat species and “tested their interactions with human SARS-CoV spike protein using both HIV-based pseudotype and live SARS-CoV infection assays. …Further, the alteration of several key residues either decreased or enhanced bat ACE2 receptor efficiency.”

It was stated “[c]himeric ACE2 was constructed by combining the N-terminal region of bat ACE2 with the C-terminal portion of human ACE2″… to see if SARS-CoV that infects human cells could infect bat cells via ACE2 receptors.

The 2019 SARS-CoV-2 genome was said to have HIV insertions.  Could this have resulted from continuation of this chimeric work? [1, 2]

In a press release September 21, 2010 the “Wildlife Trust”, a non-profit international conservation organization founded in 1971, and stated to be “dedicated to protecting wildlife and safeguarding human and animal health”, announced that the organization will be re-branded with a new name and tagline: EcoHealth Alliance, “Local Conservation, Global Health.” [1, 2]

Dr. Peter Daszak, president of EcoHealth Alliance said

“Building on our strong history, we have grown beyond our original conservation focus to become the central organization defining the intersection of local conservation and global health…A leader in the One Health movement which began in 2004, EcoHealth Alliance is on the forefront of informing the public, businesses, and the scientific community about emerging diseases, including potential pandemics.” [3]

Through The Intercept FOI requests over $95 million of EcoHealth Alliance funding comes from USAID and US Department of Defence into potential “bioweapons” research. [4, 5]

EcoHealth Alliance is in the center of tracking and cataloguing animal viruse genetic sequences and providing finance to laboratories for Gain-of-Function/Dual Use research.

The CDC/FDA post marketing safety surveillance system known as the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) is where doctors are supposed to report post vaccination injury, most don’t even know it exists, and many doctors don’t recognise or acknowledge vaccine injury.

Harvard Medical School was hired by US HHS’s Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and paid $1 million to investigate the efficiency of the VAERS reporting system, and determine if the system could be automated. Their last assessment period data point captured September 30, 2010. The Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, 3-year long Study which was released end 2010/early 2011 revealed the incredible under reporting of an alleged “safety” system in that “fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported“.  They also found that advers events following vaccination was “much higher than the “1 in a million” frequently spouted by the medical community”. [1, 3, 6]

The Harvard “developers asked the CDC to take the final step of linking VAERS and the Vaccine Safety Datalink with the Harvard Pilgrim system so that these reports could be automatically transmitted into VAERS.”  The “CDC refused to cooperate to finalize the system after realizing that automating VAERS revealed a high rate of adverse events after vaccination” [6]

Stunningly, and without any reason, in January 2011 the CDC decided that it would only published (make public) the initial reports into VAERS and would no longer publish updates.  It is now known that they many initial reports, during the COVID-19 era have not been published.  So the degree of death and morbidity following immunizations is completely unknown and secret. [2]

The COVID-19 vaccines had more VAERS reports than all vaccines ever reported, and tens of thousands of deaths, all of which is underreported and the CDC/FDA still does nothing to fix the system or stop the CV-19 jabs! [4, 5]