In 1968 The Club of Rome begins at a 2 day meeting in Rome, Italy on the topic of “The Predicament of Mankind”  – the catalyst to technocratic globalisation.

Oil tycoon/ “environmentalist” Maurice Strong is a member of the Club of Rome… he is the founder of the UN “Environmental” movement! [1, 2]

MORE INFO TO COME in the mean time WATCH

On April 1, 1968 Robert S. McNamara takes up the role of the 5th President of the World Bank Group, having resigned as Secretary of Defense under President Kennedy and then President Johnson.  McNamara was a “staunch believer in population control” and in his lead “position he was able to dictate a new policy, making World Bank loans to Third World countries contingent upon their governments’ submission to population control, with yearly sterilization quotas set by World Bank experts. Cash-short and heavily in debt, many poor nations found this pressure very difficult to withstand.”[1, 2]

The World Health Organisation, the World Bank, IMF, USAID and BMGF work hand in glove “aiding” developing nations  which has morphed into “aiding” everyone.

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) and International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (World Bank) were formed on December 27, 1945 following WWII, as permanent institutions, unlike the US “Marshall Plan” (a precursor to USAID) which “was specific: To stabilize Europe, not as a permanent program for European recovery but as an emergency tool of assistance”. [3]

On November 25, 1969 in a speech, President Richard Nixon announced the end of the U.S. offensive biological warfare/weapons program which was developing deadly biological weapons. [1, 2, 3]

Since 1943 Camp Detrick was the home of biological warfare research, in 1956 it became Fort Detrick “with a mandate of continuing biological research and remaining the world’s leading research campus for biological agents that require special containment.”  Following Nov 25, 1969 Nixon announcement, “Research at Fort Detrick became focused solely on defensive measures – public health considerations, diagnostics, preventive measures, and treatments for biological warfare infections.”  It was stated at the time the “only defense that we have at present in this country against an enemy’s biological attach is purely a medical matter.. ”

Developments from 1971 allowed the US Army and HHS to work side by side on the campus, broadening into cancer research and becoming the “center of scientific excellence in the area of public health“. [4, 5, 6]

• Since the beginning Fort Detrick has been the home of anthrax research [5].  Between 1951-55 an anthrax vaccine was developed, and  in 1960 first outbreak of anthrax in the 20th Century occurred.  Since the 1950s research staff have been given anthrax vaccines, and military since 1998 [maybe before]
• On June 11, 20o1 the DOD announced the “slow down” of anthrax vaccinations due to inadequate supplies of the vaccine, which happened to ramp up again following the anthrax letter’s incident one week after 9/11, the anthrax source eventurally traced back to Fort Detrick! [8, 9]
• “Operation Whitecoat” experiments at Fort Detirck, ran on army volunteers was reported early Nov 1969 by Richard Lebherz
• In 1987 a Memorandum Of Understanding (MOU) was established between the FDA and DOD which had provided “certain exemptions, relieving the DOD from the need to meet the ordinary requirements of the Investigation New Drug (IND)…” for its Special Immunizations Program (SIP) and use of investigational vaccines, ended.  SIP then “underwent marked change”. [7]
• In 2003 the non-profit Fort Detrick Alliance, Inc. was founded to facilitate the communications between federal agencies (DOD, USDA, DHHS, VA) and the public both local and globally – in “partnership”.

This led to the 1972 United Nations the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC), which was signed and went into force in 1975.

The non-profit, international conservation organisation called Wildlife Trust is founded in 1971 by British naturalist, author and television personality Gerald M. Durrell.  It purpose is to empower conservation scientists that are “dedicated to protecting wildlife and safeguarding human and animal health.”

In a press release dated September 21, 2010, the Wildlife Trust rebrands itself as EcoHealth Alliance.

“The new branding puts health and medicine center stage with wildlife conservation taking a back seat.”

EcoHealth Alliance pioneered Conservation Medicine and their mission is to address the link between “wildlife, livestock, human health and survival”. Their work includes research into emerging infectious diseases. [3]

They are positioning themselves to be on “the forefront of informing the public, businesses, and the scientific community about emerging diseases, including potential pandemics.” [1]

The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has been working with “EcoHealth Alliance” since 2009 to institute a new global emerging pandemic threat program called PREDICT (to research emerging diseases among high-risk wildlife and in high-risk countries) based on EcoHealth Alliance’s disease-outbreak hotspots map. [2]

Initiated by US President Nixon, following his move to shut down the US “offensive” biological weapons program, the United Nations General Assembly on December 16, 1971 agreed to prohibit the development, production, acquisition, transfer, stockpiling and use of bacteriological (biological) and toxin weapons.  [1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 9]

The United Nations Organisation for the Prohibition of Biological Weapons (OPBW) Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on Their Destruction, commonly known as the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC), was simultaneously opened for signatures in Moscow, Washington and London on April 10, 1972 and entered into force on March 26, 1975. [6]  [not virus research?]

The actual use of biological weapons was prohibited by the 1925 Geneva Protocol, the first security convention.

It was initiated by US President Nixon, and followed the United Nations General Assembly on December 16, 1971.  The purpose to prohibit the the development, production, acquisition, transfer, stockpiling and use of (bacteriological) biological and toxin weapons. [1, 2, 3, 4, 8]

As of December 2003, there were 151 UN Member States who had signed the 1972 Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention. An additional 16 countries had signed but at the time not ratified the agreement. In an August 2005 US State Department report which examined the compliance with the “obligations assumed under the BWC”  for  China, Cuba, Iran, Iraq, Libya, North Korea, Russia (and the former Soviet Union) and Syria.

They determined that “communist China maintained an offensive biological weapons program in violation of its treaty commitments and that it was run in part by an arm of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Academy of Military Medical Sciences (AMMS). That report specifically cited the AMMS’ Fifth Institute as the epicenter of the country’s bioweapons program.”  [5]

From  June 5-16, 1972 the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment [3] was held in Stockholm, Sweden headed by Maurice Strong, who at the time was a Rockefeller Foundation trustee. The conference is “hailed as a landmark moment in the history of the modern environmental movement.”  One of the major resolutions of this conference was for the creation of the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) [9] and the adoption of an action plan – EarthWatch. [1, 2, 6, 7].

“In the light of the results of the Stockholm Conference, the United Nations General Assembly decided to establish UNEP to “serve as a focal point for environmental action and co-ordination within the United Nations system” (General Assently resolution 2997(XXVII) of 15 December 1972)”, a “global enviromnental organization at Government level.” [8]

The early mission of UNEP is to” provide leadership and encourage partnerships in caring for the environment by inspiring, informing and enabling nations and people to improve their quality of life without compromising that of future generations.” …”One of the most important functions of UNEP is the promotion of environmental science and information.” to generate reports and “created world-wide awareness on emerging environmental problems”.

It is said that former UN official Maurice Strong [4, 5], “established the political vehicle the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) and the scientific vehicle, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)” to help “cause the demise of industrialized nations”… “He brought them together at the Earth Summit in Rio in 1992.”!

On October 26, 1973 Dr John Wilson, paediatric neurologist was “among 50 professors, consultants and other specialists, listening to research and discussion papers about children’s convulsive disorders” at the Royal Society of Medicine conference in London.  The topic of Wilson’s contribution was Neurological complications of pertussis inoculation, given as a triple vaccine, or DTP. [1]

Wilso stated:

“The clustering of complications in the first 24 hours after [DTP] inoculation suggests a causal rather than a coincidental relation.” …“Between January 1961 and December 1972 approximately 50 children have been seen at the Hospital for Sick Children, London, because of neurological illness thought to be due to DTP inoculation,” Wilson presented

“He was by no means the first doctor, or even the most prominent, to suggest a link between the vaccine and brain damage. But few in the lecture theatre’s steeply-ranked pews missed the dynamite in his presentation,” reports journalist Brian Deer (Dr Andrew Wakefield‘s adversary) in 1998.

Three months after the conference in January 1974, J. Wilson et al published their paper in the British Medical Association’s Archives of Disease in Childhood, Volume 49  [2]  Deer quotes it as becoming “an instant classic” and “often quoted a quarter of a century later as it was when it first appeared”

This paper and others [1953] “urge” a prospective study Precaustion has been suggested in 1953, and again now in 1974, and possibly in between.

Deer writes the “national furore…was the prototype for modern health scares.” Following an 1974 ITV broadcast featuring Wilson British DTP vaccination rates went from 80% to 31% by 1978, he reported “cases of whooping cough sored”.  In 1978 a government vaccine compenstation was established.

The paper also stated:

“Finally, we urge the systematic reporting of reactions to all forms of inoculation to the Committee on Safety of Medicines, since we understand that few, if any, reactions from DTP inoculation are notified to the Committee.

“After a frightening television broadcast in the United States in April 1982, American vaccine makers were hit with lawsuit claims worth $10 billion. Wilson’s paper was repeatedly cited” according to Deer.

It was because of the DTP vaccine that the US 1986 Act was established.  In 2011 a Harvard study concluded that only 1% of vaccine adverse reactions are reported into VAERS, and in 2023 not much has changed.

The WHO establishes the Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI) in May 23, 1974 through a World Health Assembly resolution (WHA27.57) to build on the success of the global smallpox eradication programme, and “to ensure that all children in all countries benefited from life-saving vaccines”   It aimed was to control six major childhood diseases through immunization: diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, polio, measles and Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) a vaccine against tuberculosis. [1, 2, 3, 4]

“Following the impressive success of the smallpox eradication programme, the World Health Organization looked for other activities that could build on what had already been achieved. … “Expanded” because most programmes until then had only used smallpox, BCG and diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis (DTP) vaccines.” EPI included two new diseases namely poliomyelitis and measles.

The vaccine “selection was “made on the basis of a high burden of disease and the availability of a well-tried vaccines at an affordable price. “Expanded” also meant increased coverage – incredibly, less than 5% of children in developing countries were being reached at that time by immunization services.”

The EPI program was looking to end in 1977 due to lack of funding, but got a boost when UNICEF stepped in!  The programme developed training materials and disseminated them widely.  The push for universal childhood immunization in the 1980s meant “almost every country in the world adopted the principle of a national immunization programme.”  Each decade the WHO pushes an new Immunization Agenda. [5]

“EPI has marked several key milestones over the years, including the [declaring the] eradication of smallpox in 1980, which stands as a monumental triumph in the history of immunization.” They’re still working on polio etc.

The National Security Study Memorandum (NSSM 200): Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests (The Kissenger Report) was a top-secret document [4] completed by the United States National Security Council (NSC) and released as classified on December 10, 1974, (and declassified ~1989?). This US policy document, named after the document architect Henry Kissenger, was the World Population Plan of Action to keep global population under 8 billion humans. [1, 2]

The Kissenger report research funding plan included the areas of: fertility, biomedical, field testing technologies, developing new technology, oral contraceptives, IUDs, Sterilisation, fertility control, injectable contraceptives for women, male contraceptives and much in the name of “family planning” health services.  They propose to utilise “traditional medical practitioners,” to help get to their goal (think mass vaccination?), and mandatory population control measures may be needed, also in relation to food. [2]

NSSM 200 was reworked and adopted as official United States policy through the US National Security Decision Memorandum (NSDM) 314  by President Gerald Ford on November 26, 1975. [3]  Statements within MSDM 314 include: “[a]n examination should be undertaken of the effectiveness of population control programs in countries at all levels of development, but with emphasis on [least developed countries] LDC’s” and “reductions in fertility are most needed for economic and social progress” and “[l]eaders of key developing countries should be encouraged to support national and international population assistance programs“.

• Note: Henry Kissenger was a key mentor of Klaus Schwab, the man who in January 1971 started the NGO which would become the World Economic Forum, which was actually a “CIA-funded Harvard program”. [5]
• If US policy is still in place to keep the global human population under 8 billion and 2020 it had reached 7.84 billion, is it a coincidence that the COVID-19 pandemic interventions have coincided with unprecedented global excess mortality? [2]

In 2009 Bill Gates wanted to cap this number at 8.3 billion, the next year in a Ted Talk he proposed if “we do a really good job on new vaccines, health care and reproductive health services” then we can control population growth.

Whether the “official population control/depopulation policy items influenced COVIDcrisis public health policy” can not be confirmed as yet, but, as Dr Malone writes, “one must recognize and acknowledge the amazing parallels between preceding population policy and many of the “public health” policies and actions which were implemented in USA and most western countries (particularly the “five eyes” nations)” of Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and UK with the US. – READ

From May 31 to June 11, 1976 in Vancouver, Canada, the United Nations held the first “Habitat” [Habitat I] conference where the Vancouver Declaration on Human Settlements was signed.  The United Nations began to recognize “the magnitude and consequences of rapid urbanization“.  This marks one of the earliest meetings defining the “sustainability” of the looming UN aganda.

Habitat I “provided the foundations for the birth, in 1978, of the United Nations Human Settlements Program or UN-Habitat” which “now promotes socially and environmentally sustainable towns and cities“. [2, 5]  Think “15 minute cities”. [3, 4]

This conference forms the roots of  Agenda 21 & Sustainable Development Goals, where they identified private land ownership as a threat to equity on the planet. [1]

The agreement stated that “land cannot be treated as an ordinary asset controlled by individuals” and that private land ownership is “a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth, therefore contributes to social injustice.”… “Public control of land use is therefore indispensable,” the U.N. declaration said, a prelude to the World Economic Forum’s now infamous 2017 “prediction” that by 2030, “you’ll own nothing and be happy.” [6]

Seems since 1990 “ownership” or property rights have been an illusion in the US – unbeknownst to the public.

At the International Conference on Primary Health Care (PHC) held in Almaty (formerly Alma-Ata, USSR) on September 12, 1978, the Health-For-All (HFA) Alma Ata Declaration was launched.  The declaration reaffirmed the WHO Constitution that health included physical, mental and social well-being, but that “large numbers of people and even whole countries, were not enjoying an acceptable standard of health.” From  then on primary health care was to be the key to attaining the goal of health for all by the year 2000. Which “enshrined community-based healthcare as the core of decision-making”. [1, 2, 3, 5]

“As stated in the Declaration of Alma-Ata adopted in 1978, the key to attaining the goal of health for all by the year 2000 is primary health care.” Since primary health care “services reflect and evolve from the local economic conditions and social values, they vary in different countries and communities…but should include at least education concerning prevailing health problems and the methods of preventing and controlling them… including family planning; immunization against the major infectious diseases;prevention and control of locally endemic diseases…”

Out of this declaration global targets for health were established and measured. The strategy of health-for-all has been endorsed at the highest political level, but a gap remained between what is preached and what is practised. In 1995 the HFA for the 21st Century was launched.

WHO’s dependence on private foundations and pharmaceutical companies for funding began in 1993, as such private influence to grown and “the balance of power has shifted away from populations, represented by nation states.” It “has coincided with a growing reliance on [vested-intrests] vaccine-based strategies” as the primary solution for public health. “This top-down approach represents an abandonment of the community-based healthcare principles enshrined in the Alma Ata Declaration and in the founding charter of WHO. History has come full circle” catalysed by COVID-19. [4, 6]

By 1998 it was recognised “Changes in the economic and political situation in the 1980s proved to be a major obstacle to the implementation of the health-for-all strategy…. WHO continued to support the principles of health for all, but organized itself in such a way as to deal with prevalent diseases in developingcountries. It pushed the medical approach as far as it could go, even in prevention, by giving greater emphasis to vaccinations and vertical programmes.” [7, 8]