PCR-cycle-threshold-graph CDC Januray 2020
Posted inPCR

RT-PCR Tests Used to Determine a “Case”

PCR testing was used around the world to "diagnose" the disease COVID-19 in anyone, whether they had symptoms or not. It was meant to determine if they were infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus and thus were potentially "infectious" and able…
12 May 2023Posted inPCR

CDC adds COVID-19 vaccine to childhood vaccine schedule – to help “normalise” it!

On February 10, 2023 the CDC adds COVID-19 vaccines to the US childhood immunization schedule, not for health or community transmission reasons (which it doesn't target) but to help "normalize" the COVID-19 vaccine and sends a "powerful message" everyone over six months of age to "stay up to date" with recommended COVID-19 vaccines. [1, 2, 3, 4] It comes as the FDA are considering switching the COVID-19 vaccine to a yearly schedule similar to the flu shot program, and as ACIP were considering the bivalent shot as a primary series. Since 1986, any vaccine on the childhood schedule means the vaccine manufacturer is exempt of liability! On October 19, 2022 the ACIP committee began discussing adding COVID-19 vaccines to the childhood schedule, for "the prevention of COVID-19" [5] Stating it "is an important step toward inclusion of COVID 19 vaccines in routine vaccination program"and that "[e]quitable access to COVID 19 vaccines for all ages and populations remains critically important." This schedule vaccine-type addition allows the CDC to "begin the steps necessary to award contracts for COVID-19 vaccines", which the United States Governments (USG) response had been funding nationally while under "emergency" status.  

FDA petition to amend mRNA label: including inaccurate notion of “efficacy against infection and tranmission”

On January 31, 2023 the Coalition Advocating for Adequately Labeled Medicines (CAALM) petitioned the FDA to "amend current product labeling" for Pfizer-BioNTech's and Moderna's COVID-19 mRNA vaccines.  The petition was heavily cited. Stating "[i]ncomplete, inaccurate, or misleading labeling of any medical product can negatively impact the health and safety of Americans, with global ramifications considering the international importance of FDA decisions." They noted "[t]here is a widespread (but inaccurate) notion that efficacy against infection and transmission have been established by substantial evidence, and that these vaccines contribute to herd immunity." Statements that have been inacurately repeated by "authorities". On April 18, 2023 the FDA resonded in a letter [1] with the alarming statement: “FDA authorization and licensure standards for vaccines do not require demonstration of the prevention of infection or transmission…Similarly, a vaccine can meet the EUA standard without any evidence that the vaccine prevents infection or transmission.” [pg 11] [So what is the purpose of a vaccine? If a vaccine doesn't prevent infection or stop transmission how does it contribute to herd immunity? Define "protection"!  Isn't reducing symptoms (it this is protection) put the product in the category of a drug?  Then the product would undergo a more stringent..> READ MORE

Jacobson v. Massachusetts case – Get injected or a $5 fine

On February 20, 1905, the U.S. Supreme Court on appeal from the Supreme Court of Massachusetts, in a 7-2 majority, "in one of its most clear and conclusive paragraphs emphatically declares the preeminent rights of the individual in certain spheres" stated “There is, of course, a sphere within which the individual may assert the supremacy of his own will and rightfully dispute the authority of any human government, especially of any free government existing under a written constitution, to interfere with the exercise of that will.” In 1902, Pastor Henning Jacobson, claimed that he and his son were both injured by previous smallpox vaccines, and refused to receive any more.  In the 1904 Supreme court case of Jacobson v. Massachusetts it was concluded that the city of Cambridge, Massachusetts "at worst" could fine residents who refused to receive vaccination.  The court decision relied on the presumption that the vaccination (a word specific to vaccina-inoculation at the time) interupted infection and transmission of the disease in the community. [1, 2, 3]  This was a State law that was up held, not a federal legislation. “If a person should deem it important that vaccination should not be performed in his case and..> READ MORE

Biden mandates CV19 vaccine for 2/3 of US workforce

On September 9, 2021 President Biden issues two Executive Orders mandating COVID-19 vaccines for federal workers and contractors and announced new requirements for large employers and health care providers that he said would affect around 100 million workers, more than two-thirds of the U.S. workforce." [1, 2, 7]  At the time 80 million Americans were unvaccinated. The federal worker deadline is by November 22, 2021, and the federal contractor deadline was December 8, 2021 OSHA is directed to mandate that private sector employers with 100 or more employees to require their employees receive a COVID-19 vaccine, also the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) at the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced the requirement for all health care workers at facilities participating in Medicare and Medicaid to be fully vaccinated. [3, 4, 5] Even though an August 24, 2021 pre-print study with CDC-affiliated authors showed that the vaccinated had high viral loads (break through cases)...vaccination was not going to stop transmission. [6]