Antibody studies shows lower IFR than expected, in line with flu

On April 11, 2020 a preprint study by John Ioannidis and Jay Bhattacharya et al, looking at 3,300 people living in Santa Clara and revealed that 1 in 66 people already had SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies, a rate which extraporated out to around 2 million people already being infected, when at that same time the official number is only 1000.  This translates into an IFR of 0.12-0.5-2% which is in line with the flu. [1, 2] The sero-survey gives you a snapshot in time of who is infected in your given population.  The commercial tests can be used, which shows if a person had been infected for at least a week earlier, even if they have had no symptoms. It is an inexpensive way to get a lot of useful data. "Bhattacharya says the results probably undercount the prevalence in the wider population, because they miss anyone who has been infected too recently to have mounted an immune response, and exclude people in prisons, nursing homes and other institutional settings." A German study on April 9, 2020 had tested some 500 people in a village of more than 12,000 found that 1 in 7 had already been infected, overall estimating that 15%..> READ MORE
PCR-cycle-threshold-graph CDC Januray 2020
Posted inPCR

RT-PCR Tests Used to Determine a “Case”

PCR testing was used around the world to "diagnose" the disease COVID-19 in anyone, whether they had symptoms or not. It was meant to determine if they were infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus and thus were potentially "infectious" and able…
12 May 2023Posted inPCR

Congress to Strengthen Global Health led by Germany

On May 1, 2019, the leaders of Germany's two conservative parties, the CDU and the CSU, pledged to stick together after a year of public discord, then 7 days later on May 8, 2019, at a "top-class congress", the CDU/CSU parliamentary group met in the Bundestag with invited guests to discuss the topic "Strengthening global health - implementing the UN Sustainable Development Goal". In attendance was German Chancellor Angela Merkel, WHO's director general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, and members of the Global Health subcommittee represented by Gates Foundation, Christian Drosten, Wellcome Trust's Jeremy Farrar and the 2017 founder of the Center for Global Health Prof. Dr. Clarissa Prazeres da Costa. [1, 2, 3, 4] [NOTES] Germany has taken on a pioneering lead role in "developing a strategy for global health, and the World Health Organization (WHO) is working on an action plan." "With its G20 presidency, Germany has put global health on the international agenda."..."I think it’s fair to say that Germany is one of WHO’s greatest supporters and best friends."  Tedros said.  Tedros will present the Global Health The Plan to Nations General Assembly in September 2019! At the meeting Ilona Kickbusch warned of "thinking in national units or in..> READ MORE

WHO finally acknowledges PCR test flaw

On December 14, 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) released a guidance memo (dated December 7, 2020), warning that high cycles on PCR tests could result in false positives. [1] During the pandemic positive PCR is a positive "diagnosis" for COVID-19, rendering the person a COVID-19 "case" when in fact the asymptomatic person is highly likely negative, because HIGH CYCLES of 40-45 have been used throughout 2020 to create large number of false cases. Traditionally PCR tests are use as a confirmatory test to help a doctor determine a disease diagnosis in someone who has symptoms. But from March 2020 when the WHO declared "test, test, test", millions of people who were designated a "close contact" received a test whether they had symptoms or not.  If the PCR test returned a positive result, they were diagnosed as having COVID-19 (the disease), labelled asymptomatic if they were healthy, and became a "case" statistic.  If the test was amplified over 35 cycles, 97% of "positive" results would be a "false positive".  PCR cycling was commonly run up to 40 to 45 cycles! Australia up to 40 cycles. A few weeks before, on November 27, 2020 the European consortium of scientists requested the..> READ MORE

Doctors petition EMA to stop vax trials – serous concerns

On December 1, 2020 the International Consortium of Scientists in Life Sciences (ICSLS), led by ex-Pfizer scientists Dr Michael Yeadon and German public health expert Dr Wolfgang Wodarg, filed an application with the European Medicine Agency (EMA), the body responsible for EU-wide drug approval, requesting the immediate suspension of all SARS-CoV-2 vaccine studies. [1] In their 43 page document they lay out their reasons for the urgent request to halt the trials, which include: Possible Infertility issues: Syncytin-1 is a prerequisite for a successful human pregnancy and is also found in "homologous form in the spike proteins of SARS viruses", it could be possible anti-spike antibodies could also act as anti-Syncytin-1 antibodies thus a vaccinated woman could be rendered infertile for an unknown duration. Likely ADE: The formation of "non-neutralising antibodies" could lead to an exaggerated immune reaction, known as antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) phenomenon; when a vaccinated person is exposed to a "wild" coronavirus they could die, as was demonstrated in animal studies.  The vaccine induced "immune response" rendered them vulnerable when re-infected PEG anaphylaxis: The mRNA vaccines contain polyethylene glycol (PEG) which 70% of people develop antibodies against, as such exposing them to potentially fatal allergic reactions upon vaccination...> READ MORE

Study: asymptomatic cases NOT the driver of SARS-CoV-2 spread

A study published November 20, 2020 of a city-wide, 19 day, mass PCR screening programme of nearly 10 million residents in Wuhan, China in the post-lockdown period from May 14, 2020 (Alpha variant), shows there "were no positive tests amongst 1,174 close contacts of [the 300] asymptomatic cases." Meaning those who have no symptoms but return a positive PCR result (asymptomatic) did not spread virus to close contacts. Wuhan was under strict lockdown measures from January 23, 2020 until April 8, 2020.  Lockdown was used to stop the virus spread, but mostly because "on of China's top expert" there were "super spreaders".  Following lockdown, "the COVID-19 epidemic was generally under control in China, and the whole country has progressed into a post-lockdown phase." A systematic review published December 2020 showed asymptomatic spread was not a driver of the pandemic. [2] In May 2022 published a systematic review of nearly 30,000 people over 42 countries has found asymptomatic carriers are about 68% less likely to pass the virus on compared to those with symptoms. [1] The "symptoms" that can be classified as COVID-19 have undergone several changes over the course of the pandemic, initially being "a high temperature, a cough and..> READ MORE
WHO pandemic treaty
Posted inGlobalism Pandemic-Response Public Health

WHO “Pandemic Treaty” vs Amendments to Existing International Health Regulations

The COVID-19 pandemic has given the global community an "opportunity" to "justify" making drastic changes to international legislation to "prevent" a pandemic from ever happening again. The timeline below tracks two World Health Organisation's proposed pandemic legislative "responses", to the…
20 May 2022Posted inGlobalism, Pandemic-Response, Public Health