In a press release on November 16, 2020, Moderna announced their intended to submission to the FDA for Emergency Use Authorisation of their COVID-19 vaccine, on the back of their Phase 3 trial returning 94.5% efficacy. [1]

A fuller analysis was released on November 30, 2020, which showed a 94.1% efficacy.

In a press release on November 9, 2020, Pfizer-BioNTech announce their preliminary phase 3 clinical trial data suggests their COVID-19 vaccine is more than 90% effective. [1, 2]

Then they announced via press release on November 18, 2020, that the final analysis of their COVID-19 vaccine Phase III clinical trial data showed it was 95% effective and with no safety concerns, stating:

“Primary efficacy analysis demonstrates BNT162b2 to be 95% effective against COVID-19 beginning 28 days after the first dose;170 confirmed cases of COVID-19 were evaluated, with 162 observed in the placebo group versus 8 in the vaccine group”.

“Efficacy was consistent across age, race and ethnicity demographics. The observed efficacy in adults over 65 years of age was over 94%,”  [1]

Those results had yet to be peer reviewed, but the media ran with the claim. Pfizer filed for emergency use authorization with the FDA “within days” of this announcement.

On November 20, 2020 the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published a webpage to explain how Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) , a regulatory mechanism to them during public health emergencies.

Under an EUA, FDA may allow the use of unapproved medical products, or unapproved uses of approved medical products in an emergency to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases or conditions when certain statutory criteria have been met, including that there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives.

They reiterated the FDA is “globally respected” as a regulator and are trusted by the public, insinuating their authorisation means a “rigorous” evaluation has been made.

A study published November 20, 2020 of a city-wide, 19 day, mass PCR screening programme of nearly 10 million residents in Wuhan, China in the post-lockdown period from May 14, 2020 (Alpha variant), shows there “were no positive tests amongst 1,174 close contacts of [the 300] asymptomatic cases.”

Meaning those who have no symptoms but return a positive PCR result (asymptomatic) did not spread virus to close contacts.

Wuhan was under strict lockdown measures from January 23, 2020 until April 8, 2020.  Lockdown was used to stop the virus spread, but mostly because “on of China’s top expert” there were “super spreaders“.  Following lockdown, “the COVID-19 epidemic was generally under control in China, and the whole country has progressed into a post-lockdown phase.”

A systematic review published December 2020 showed asymptomatic spread was not a driver of the pandemic. [2]

In May 2022 published a systematic review of nearly 30,000 people over 42 countries has found asymptomatic carriers are about 68% less likely to pass the virus on compared to those with symptoms. [1]

The “symptoms” that can be classified as COVID-19 have undergone several changes over the course of the pandemic, initially being “a high temperature, a cough and a loss of taste or smell, but then simply feeling tired and a headache were added.  So a healthy person with a headache that returns a [false] positive PCR result can be labelled “statistically sick” with COVID-19 i.e. a “case”.  The more you “tests” the more “cases” will be found.

The risk of asymptomatic spread of SARS-CoV-2 was/is the reason governments around the world pushed for  the testing and lockdown of healthy people.  Quarantine of the sick has traditionally been the public health measure.

On November 23, 2020 the US CDC published information on the expected to be authorised new technology mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. [1, 2]

Stating “facts” that emerging science showed, turned out to be misinformation.

• The “immune response” that “produces antibodies, is what protects us from getting infected if the real virus enters our bodies”.
• The protein which the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines instructs the human cells to make was advertised as “a harmless piece of what is called the “spike protein.””
• The “vaccines are given in the upper arm muscle. Once the instructions (mRNA) are inside the muscle cells, the cells use them to make the protein piece. After the protein piece is made, the cell breaks down the instructions and gets rid of them.” Which the media then spread the world, quoting CDC. [5]  – It was soon discovered the LNP carrying mRNA dosnt stay in the arm.
• “At the end of the process, our bodies have learned how to protect against future infection. The benefit of mRNA vaccines, like all vaccines, is those vaccinated gain this protection without ever having to risk the serious consequences of getting sick with COVID-19.”
• “mRNA never enters the nucleus of the cell, which is where our DNA (genetic material) is kept.” – (No evidence to support this statement) [3]
• “mRNA COVID-19 vaccines cannot give someone COVID-19″ – [COVID-19 is a collection of symptoms, the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is demonstrating to cause COVID-19 like symptoms]

The only COVID-19 vaccines theFDA will grant emergency use authorization are those that meet the ” rigorous safety and effectiveness standards” guidelines, of amongst other things,  >50% with placebo controlled trials.

Researchers have been studying and working with mRNA vaccines “for decades” even though there “are currently no licensed mRNA vaccines”.

“Interest has grown in these vaccines because they can be developed in a laboratory using readily available materials. This means the process can be standardized and scaled up, making [ALL] vaccine development faster than traditional methods of making vaccines.”

“Future mRNA vaccine technology may allow for one vaccine to provide protection for multiple diseases, thus decreasing the number of shots needed for protection against common vaccine-preventable diseases.”

The CDC later quitely removed from website, their claim that the “mRNA and the spike protein do not last long in the body”, which follows is later edited after the science shows it can remain in blood for at least 28 days, let alone the arm muscle.

On December 1, 2020 the International Consortium of Scientists in Life Sciences (ICSLS), led by ex-Pfizer scientists Dr Michael Yeadon and German public health expert Dr Wolfgang Wodarg, filed an application with the European Medicine Agency (EMA), the body responsible for EU-wide drug approval, requesting the immediate suspension of all SARS-CoV-2 vaccine studies. [1]

In their 43 page document they lay out their reasons for the urgent request to halt the trials, which include:

• Possible Infertility issues: Syncytin-1 is a prerequisite for a successful human pregnancy and is also found in “homologous form in the spike proteins of SARS viruses”, it could be possible anti-spike antibodies could also act as anti-Syncytin-1 antibodies thus a vaccinated woman could be rendered infertile for an unknown duration.
• Likely ADE: The formation of “non-neutralising antibodies” could lead to an exaggerated immune reaction, known as antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) phenomenon; when a vaccinated person is exposed to a “wild” coronavirus they could die, as was demonstrated in animal studies.  The vaccine induced “immune response” rendered them vulnerable when re-infected
• PEG anaphylaxis: The mRNA vaccines contain polyethylene glycol (PEG) which 70% of people develop antibodies against, as such exposing them to potentially fatal allergic reactions upon vaccination.
• Unknown long-term side effects: It simply can not be determined what long term health issues could result when only short-term clinical trials are conducted, as was the case with narcolepsy experienced post-2009 swine flu vaccination, thus an emergency approval could expose an unsuspecting population of hundreds of millions of people to unacceptable risks.

On December 2, 2020, the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine was “temporarily authorised“, by UK’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency ( MHRA), becoming the first COVID-19 vaccine to be authorised anywhere in the world, “paving the way for mass vaccination”. [1, 2]

The vaccine was reported to offer “up to 95% protection against Covid-19 illness”.  Pfizer’s CEO stated on December 3, 2020 that Pfizer don’t know if the vaccine will prevent transmission – the entire purpose of a mass vaccination campaign.

The governments authorisation “follows months of rigorous clinical trials and a thorough analysis of the data by experts at the MHRA who have concluded that the vaccine has met its strict standards of safety, quality and effectiveness”, contradictory to Pfizer FOIA documents.

On 30 December “the cheaper and easier-to-distribute Oxford-AstraZeneca  COVID-19 vaccine” was approved.  A third vaccine, produced by Moderna, was approved for use in the UK in January 2021. Finally, Janssen’s single-dose vaccine was approved in May 2021, although it is yet to be used. [1, 2]

The US Department of Defense (DoD) released the first images of a COVID-19 vaccination record card and vaccination kits on December 3, 2020, prior to anticipated EUA of COVID-19 vaccines. [3]

“Vaccination cards will be used as the “simplest” way to keep track of Covid-19 shots, said Dr. Kelly Moore, associate director of the Immunization Action Coalition, which is supporting frontline workers who will administer Covid-19 vaccinations.” [1, 2]

The 100 million DoD vaccine kits “include a card, a needle and syringe, alcohol wipes and a mask. Operation Wa

The card for the 2-shot vaccines already has additional spaces for 2 booster shots – as though it was planned! The vaccination clinics are to also report the data electronically to their state immunization registries and the CDC – making a card redunant unless they planned ahead of time to use it as “proof of vaccination” to be eligible to move in society

On December 14, 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) released a guidance memo (dated December 7, 2020), warning that high cycles on PCR tests could result in false positives. [1]

During the pandemic positive PCR is a positive “diagnosis” for COVID-19, rendering the person a COVID-19 “case” when in fact the asymptomatic person is highly likely negative, because HIGH CYCLES of 40-45 have been used throughout 2020 to create large number of false cases.

Traditionally PCR tests are use as a confirmatory test to help a doctor determine a disease diagnosis in someone who has symptoms.

But from March 2020 when the WHO declared “test, test, test”, millions of people who were designated a “close contact” received a test whether they had symptoms or not.  If the PCR test returned a positive result, they were diagnosed as having COVID-19 (the disease), labelled asymptomatic if they were healthy, and became a “case” statistic.  If the test was amplified over 35 cycles, 97% of “positive” results would be a “false positive“.  PCR cycling was commonly run up to 40 to 45 cycles! Australia up to 40 cycles.

A few weeks before, on November 27, 2020 the European consortium of scientists requested the pivotal PCR test publication be retracted.

On December 9, 2020 the European Medical Agency (EMA) was the subject of a cyberattack which was revealed that “COVID-19 medicines and vaccines” [1] data was stolen.  This included “email screenshots, EMA peer review comments, Word documents, PDFs, and PowerPoint presentations”, of which some of those documents related to “the regulatory submission for Pfizer and BioNTech’s COVID-19 vaccine candidate, BNT162b2.” [2]

Nineteen days after the hack, on December 21, 2020, the EMA granted Conditional Marketing Authorization (CMA) to Pfizer-BioNTech, for the very vaccine in question – which the hack reveals that the EMA regulators had at the time over 100 regulatory objections.

On of the biggest objection was reported by a BMJ investigation published on March 10, 2021, that revealed by November 23, 2020 the EMA “regulators had major concerns over unexpectedly low quantities of intact mRNA” …”between the clinical batches and proposed commercial batches—from around 78% to 55%.”  Revealing concerning batch integrity instability. [3, 4, 5, 6]

On December 14, 2020 Pfizer/BioNTech removes the saline placebo control arm (unblinds) of their Phase 3 clinical trial, just 3 days after FDA issues Emergency Use Authorisation (EUA) for Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.  This unblinding  of the control group by offering the trial participants the option to take the treatment product (the vaccine) eliminates the true ability to conduct legitimate long term safety studies.

• Dec 14, 2020 – Pfizer eliminates the placebo control clinical trial group
• Jan 14, 2021 – Moderna eliminates the placebo control clinical trial group

Under EUA these new products referred to as ‘vaccines’ are still undergoing data collection and thus are experimental.  Placebo control safety data has now been compromised as the control group get the treatment. [1]

By March 2021 FOIA documents show 90% of placebo group had received at least one mRNA shot – i.e. “Pfizer stopped collecting useful data long before the planned end date of the clinical trial.”

Once a RCT is unblinded and the placebo control group is offered the treatment, the safety data is destroyed. “You cannot make conclusions from the data there in, after doing so.”

As of December 15, 2020 the CDC recommends “healthcare personnel who are pregnant” to discuss getting the COVID-19 vaccine “with a healthcare provider” as this “might help them make an informed decision”.

Currently there is “limited data about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines for people who are pregnant“, this population was excluded from clinical trails.

“While studies have not yet been done, based on how mRNA vaccines work [what about LNP], experts believe they are unlikely to pose a risk for people who are pregnant.”!!!

“Animal developmental and reproductive toxicity (DART) studies are ongoing and studies in people who are pregnant are planned.  CDC and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have safety monitoring systems in place to capture information about vaccination during pregnancy and will closely monitor reports.”