EU hosts Coronavirus Global Response pledging summit for vaccines

On 4 May 2020 a fund-raising teleconference conference event, organized by the European Union, brought in monetary pledges from countries around the world (except the US) raising 7.4 billion euros ($8 billion) for the Coronavirus Global Response which went to CEPI, Gavi, The Global Fund, and Unitaid for coronavirus vaccine research, distribution and the newly formed ACT-Accelerator. [2, 3, 4] The pledging summit was hosted by EU President Ursula Van de Leyen who said "none of this would have been possible" without her friend Victor Dzau of the GPMB (the organisation who wrote the report that "started" Event 201).  She also  warned that it is just the start of an effort that must be sustained over time to beat the disease. [1] For more than three hours, one by one, global leaders said a few words over video link all stated in some form the need for "diagnostics, therapeutics and universal access to a safe and effective vaccines." [@2:20] The commission then announced its joining with international advocacy organisation Global Citizen to launch the ‘Global Goal: Unite For Our Future’ a global pledging summit and concert for Saturday 27 June, it was hosted by President von der Leyen and raised..> READ MORE

Bill Gates: a vaccine for 7 billion people is the only solution

Self proclaimed health expert, Bill Gates, who has no medical or scientific qualifications, but is a “global health” philanthropist, was interviewed [with seemingly scripted questions] on BBC Breakfast on April 12, 2020 and told us that: "the thing that will get us back to the world that we had before coronavirus is the vaccine and getting that out to all 7 billion people" There was no vaccine at this time, they were all experimental and in early trials.  And why did all 7 billon need a shot when many people already had been natural infected and mounted an immune response?  Could it be because he had investments in the vaccine companies, and would make a fortune if they were force upon the world? Bill also claimed that "we didn't simulate this, we didn't practice" yet in October 2019 his foundation was a co-sponsor of a coronavirus pandemic simulation called Event 201! Bill is pushing for "global cooperation" and more funding.  According to Bill the "rich" countries are now experiencing the "second wave" of "very challenging epidemics", though he predicted the "developing countries who yet don't have a large number of cases" are likely to be worst hit because "their ability..> READ MORE

#FireFauci begins

Dr Shiva Ayyadurai (@va_shiva) started the #FireFauci hashtag in April 2020. Via his YT channel Dr Shiva addressed in videos how Dr Anthony Fauci, the director of NIAID, wasn’t using science to support his pandemic measures, he has conflicts of interest and he has neglected to address immune health. On April 3, 2020 Dr Shiva started a petition to "Fire Fauci" and in 10 days it had received 60K signatures. The petition in short: “Dr. Fauci’s policy, at best, is based on a 1950s outdated ‘one-size-fits-all,’ non-personalized approach to medicine and public health; and, at worst is derived from a ‘fake science’ understanding of the immune system…” June 2021, after Dr Fauci’s emails have been exposed, it reveals the truth that in fact the science relating to the virus origins, masks, and more wasn’t being followed publicly by Fauci, and thus we see a resurgence into #FireFauci.

Surprising evaluation of COVID-19 deaths in Italy

Italian health authorities find that “only 12 per cent of death certificates" have shown a direct causality from COVID-19, while 88% of patients who have died have at least one pre-morbidity – many had 2 or 3. Important to note, Italy has the second oldest population in Europe, the cohort that is the most susceptible to complications from SARS-CoV-2 infection if not treated early.

WHO launch their SOLIDARITY clinical trial initiative for therapeutics

On March 18, 2020 the WHO launch their SOLIDARITY initiative, a multi-arm, multi-country coordinated clinical trial effort for potential coronavirus therapies "to help find an effective treatment for COVID-19". It is one of the largest international randomised trials for COVID-19 treatments, enrolling almost 12,000 patients in 500 hospital sites in over 30 countries.” [4, 5] Global Randomised controlled clinical trials focused on hospitalised patients NOT those in an early outpatient setting which was the focus of frontline doctors who were successful in keeping their patients out of hospital. The success that front line doctors are having [1, 2, 3] is NOT being explored by health authorities in their official trials.

Symptoms of COVID-19 infection

Coronaviruses typically causes the "common cold" or other mild respiratory viral illnesses, and historically are highly infectious and mutate regularly.  SARS-CoV-2 has features different to normal coronaviruses and symptoms which may appear 2 to 14 days after exposure. The disease caused by SARS-CoV-2 virus is called COVID-19, which can manifest in a wide range of symptoms from nothing through a broad range of flu-like issues.  Four out of 5 had no symptoms, and about 1% of the population are susceptible to escalated symptoms, generally those predisposed with a weakened immune system. [1] As most people have no to mild symptoms (meaning their immune system is healthy), the world adopted a test (PCR) to determine if they were statistically “sick”. something never done before in history, especially using a test that is not "fit for purpose". US doctors were/are advise by the NIH protocol to do nothing until their patients symptoms have escalated to the point they require hospitalisation, something unprecedented in the any disease action.  Independent doctors didn’t heed this advice.  WHO recommendation on home care and treatment guidelines. The WHO interim guidance document for management of COVID-19 was released 28 May 2020 ( stating no early HCQ or corticosteroid..> READ MORE

US goes into lockdown for “15 days to slow the spread” , Stockmarket crashed

On March 16, 2020, after spending the weekend with his public health advisors, Dr Anthony Fauci and Dr Deborah Birx, with President Trump, in a press conference announced the US will go into lockdown for 15 days to get "people separated" to get the virus contained or to “flatten the curve”.  The "15 days to slow the spread" communication [5].  Dr Birx referenced the UK Imperial Model of "social distancing" is used as justification for such unprecedented, extreme measures. [1, 2, 4, 6] "This press conference is what unleashed the political panic. States all over the country locked down." Never before had healthy people been locked-down or quarantined, but Dr Birx, former military, pushed for these measures.  There was no science to support this non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPI) to control a respiratory virus, as revealed in an October 2019 WHO report. [It failed] Previously: On March 9, 2020, Trump was still of the opinion that the virus could be handled by normal means. [7] On March 12, 2020 President Trump misread the teleprompter saying "that the travel ban would include goods" triggering the first stockmarket fall (Black Thursday), then on Monday March 16, 2020 following the announcement of the lockdown plan,..> READ MORE

Imperial Model Report 9 released – it’s used to “justify” lockdowns

On March 16, 2020, the Imperial College’s epidemiological modelling team led by Prof. Neil Ferguson, released their Report 9,  which gave a “modelled” prediction for UK & US's expected death toll from SARS-CoV-2 infection with no pharma-intervention (aka vaccine) being available, predicting 40 million deaths. Unmitigated predicted deaths in 2020: UK: 510,000 US: 2,200,000 Based on this "Imperial Model", isolation of “cases”, home quarantine and social distancing was recommended to mitigate the predicted losses, but Imperial stressed it did ‘not consider the wider social and economic costs of suppression, which will be high’. Unlike Sweden who used a different model, instead partnered with their population and did not lockdown. [3, 4, 5,11] US Health officials used this mathematical model to justify lockdowns, but a "cost-benefit calculation – a basic requirement for pretty much every public health intervention – was never made". [8] Forced lockdowns and quarantining the healthy has never before been done in history, it is not based on science only a predicted model and inspired by the CCP. At this time there was no current scientific support for such NPIs, and early treatment options were being revealed by frontline doctors successfully treating patients. Nine days later, after UK..> READ MORE

UK: Goal is to reach Herd Immunity

On March 13, 2020, the UK’s chief scientific adviser Sir Patrick Vallance, said the government wants 60% of the population to catch coronavirus to try and create “herd immunity” to protect against the virus becoming an annual crisis.  He "thought the coronavirus was likely to become an "annual virus" and that the strategy was to limit the impact on the NHS but not stop the virus completely." [2] Three days later Neil Ferguson's Imperial College London's model predictions were released, predicting 260,000 could die if herd immunity was pursued.   Resulting in "541 scientists criticised Vallance's ‘herd immunity’ idea", allegedly upon the "fears for the NHS, who are already struggling to meet the demands of an increase in sick patients,". [1] The Ferguson's computer model suggested that "the new tighter controls could limit deaths to around 20,000." On May 5, 2020, Ferguson, thinking he was immune, broke his own lockdown rules by escaping to his mistress.  He resigned shortly after from his position on the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE), which Patrick Vallance heads up, along with Jeremy Farrar.

WHO declares the COVID-19 outbreak a Pandemic

On March 11, 2020 the World Health Organisation (WHO) Director-General, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus declared the novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak a pandemic. [2] “We are deeply concerned both by the alarming levels of spread and severity and by the alarming levels of inaction...We have therefore made the assessment that COVID-19 can be characterised as a pandemic. Pandemic is not a word to use lightly or carelessly. It's a word that, if misused, can cause unreasonable fear or unjustified acceptance that the fight is over, leading to unnecessary suffering and death." WHO Director General, Tedros Adhonom Ghebreyesus on March 11, 2020 at Virtual press conference on COVID-19 [3, 4] The following day Tedros stated "this assessment for two main reasons: first, because of the speed and scale of transmission". Though the declaration of a "pandemic is no longer a designation triggering a formal response" stated Tarik Jasarevic a WHO spokesperson, the PHEIC last month put all member states on alert ! The declaration of a PHEIC, not "pandemic" it would appear, gave the WHO Director-General overreaching global powers to member states who signed the International Health Regulations (IHR) (2005).  The documents purpose is for the "control of the international spread of..> READ MORE