FDA issues first COVID-19 vaccine EUA for Pfizer-BioNTech with no data on “preventing transmission”

On December 11, 2020, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted the first Emergency Use Authorisation (EUA) for a brand new technology product, the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccine, just 9 months after phase I trials began, and after only 108 days of regulatory safety review. In their press release they stated: "The FDA has determined that Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine has met the statutory criteria for issuance of an EUA".  The FDA stated the vaccine "may be effective in preventing COVID-19", then state it is 95% effective in "preventing" COVID-19, that 95% is based on "a 2 month study of a couple hundred people.  That's it!". [3] The day before, on December 10, 2020, the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) met to assess the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine and prepare a Briefing Document for the FDA. [6] The FDA stated "[t]he vaccine was 95% effective in preventing COVID-19 disease among these clinical trial participants with eight COVID-19 cases in the vaccine group and 162 in the placebo group."  8 plus 162 equals 170 trial participants was all that were used to determined the relative risk of "95% effective", where as the absolute risk (of all 36,523 trial participants)..> READ MORE

South Australia goes into Lockdown

State Coordinator, Commissioner Grantley Stevens enacted a Stay at Home Direction to lockdown a million South Australians for a 6 days “circuit breaker” on the back of an alleged new “pizza box” transmission as claimed by Chief Public Health Officer Professor Spurrier. [1, 2, 3] The Direction was revoked on 22nd November, 3 days later, allowing South Australians out of home lockdown.

ICAN demands FDA mandate inert placebo controls in COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials

Upon finding out AstraZeneca COVID-19 Vaccine clinical trials were not using a placebo control, but a neningococcal vaccine (Menveo) as a "control", the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) a non-profit organisation, petitioned the FDA to mandate inert placebo control groups in US COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials, as well as track the safety for the long-term in properly sized trial groups. [1, 2] Nine days after ICAN filed its initial petition, on June 30, 2020, the FDA changed course and issued emergency guidance to industry that all COVID-19 clinical trials must use a placebo control. Later ICAN sued the FDA to supply the safety studies on the Menveo vaccine, in case they intended to approve it as an active control for US EUA products. Many don’t realise using another vaccine for the “control” group to assess “vaccine safety”, is a common and accepted practice. They don’t use inert placebo controls.  This is why post marketing surveillance is so important, but the authorities have failed in their duty.

The Great Barrington Declaration released – need “Focused Protection”

On October 4, 2020, The Great Barrington Declaration was relased.  It was authored by the world’s leading infectious disease specialists from Stanford, Harvard & Oxford and signed by independent global experts calling for an immediate withdrawal of the lockdown strategy for healthy populations, and instead take a “Focused Protection” approach for our most vulnerable, to mitigate the "enormous cost" such as economic and mental health damage, which the current measures are unnecessarily inflicting on populations across the globe. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] The Declaration was written by three eminent doctors: Dr. Jay Bhattacharya [7], Dr. Sunetra Gupta [8] and Dr. Martin Kulldorff [9]. Shortly after the Declaration's release, Dr Fauci, Dr Collins et al, through email communications conspired to discredit these highly credentialed experts.  It was an “outright war on top scientists” according to Dr Scott Atlas who witnessed this from his advisory role on the U.S. Coronavirus Task Force. Two years in, by March 2022 "we now know the measures didn't do very much to slow down the spread" and it is coming to common light these scientist's were right all along. [6]

Drosten knew PCR test is “not fit for purpose”

A German article from October 2, 2020 reveals that Christan Drosten, the virologist responsible for the WHO PCR test parameters, has known since 2014 of the inherent limitations of the PCR test for "diagnosing an infection". (translated here). A positive PCR test result - designates a person as statistically ill - whether they have symptoms or not! PCR method is “so sensitive that it can detect a single genetic molecule of the virus.”  That doesn’t mean one is infected or infectious. In 2014 Drosten considered “the panic surrounding MERS to be largely media-made.” The more people you test, the more positive cases are reported – yet they are mostly healthy people.  This explains why when case numbers exploded, the death numbers did not follow.

AstraZeneca promised “not to profit from COVID-19 vaccine”

Geoff Hsu a Biotech Growth fund manager says he isn’t banking on pharma companies making big profits from “emergency COVID-19 vaccines” and expects them to be priced “reasonably” because he believes “companies genuinely want to do the right thing”. AstraZeneca promised “not to profit from a COVID-19 vaccine during the pandemic,” and others alleged to forgo profits, though Pfizer CEO intends to profit along with Moderna who’ve never before marketed any product. AstraZeneca, by November 2021, within 9 month start to reap profits, from COVID-19 vaccines.  By May 2021, “COVID vaccine profits minted 9 pharma billionaires.” At this time the WHO estimate 150 COVID-19 vaccines and 200 treatments currently in development.

WHO hires PR firm to influence opinion

WHO hires the PR firm Hill and Knowlton Strategies LLC to help ‘amplify’ the message. [1] Soft power influence (through stealth): Celebrities from around the world to perform virtual “One World Concert“ Celebrities used in ‘#PasstheMic to the experts” message. Religious leaders.

Global Vaccine Summit – Launched IA2030 and pledged funds COVID-19 vaccine for “developing world”

On June 4, 2020 the UK hosted the GAVI virtual Global Vaccine Summit where world leaders pledged financial commitment for “equitable immunisation coverage and global health security in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic”. Australia pledged $244 million Oxfam expected this Vaccine Alliance pledging conference "to raise at least US$ 7.4 billion to support the roll out of vaccination programs across the developing world, and establish a new fund to help developing countries buy and distribute a coronavirus vaccine." At the summit the Immunisation Agenda 2030 (IA2030) officially launched, that is the new decade of vaccines, the "utopia" goal from 2015, to achieve “a world where everyone, everywhere, at every age, fully benefits from vaccines for good health".

Two HCQ scientific papers retracted from 2 peer review journals – UNPRECEDENTED!

The media promoted a Lancet study that purported to show that hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) or chloroquine were toxic to the hearth stating "each of these drug regimens was associated with decreased in-hospital survival and increased frequency of ventricular arrhythmias when used for treatment of COVID-19". The fraudulent paper that discredited a potential early COVID-19 treatment (HCQ) was published on May 22, 2020 in The Lancet, a peer reviewed journal, and by June 5th it was retracted! [1, 2, 3, 4] The WHO used this published paper to justifying halting their HCQ SOLIDARITY arm of their trials, and so did Australia’s Department of Health, as FOI request revealed.  Other papers still reference this fraudulent study. The company Surgisphere, which provided the data for the now retracted paper was heavily scrutinised, including by Australia, resulting in another peer review journal, NEJM also retracting a paper that used this same company. Surgisphere has since been removed from the traditional internet [5, 6] but archives can be found. The doctor who started the company is suspect, and his trademarked product QuartzClinical referenced on the website was registered in only March 2020 and abandoned 9 month later! How did all this escape the alleged internal peer..> READ MORE

FOIA proves SARS-CoV-2 virus has not been isolated

The Victorian Government was asked under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to provide “a document that shows there is a test that 100% positively identifies the causal agent, SARS-CoV-2, and not other coronaviruses”.  The government response was “no relevant documents have been located”. A FOIA request in Canada asking for evidence that SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated, returned “no records responsive to your request were identified.”  These null responses, and at least 165 from other global health organisations show that Koch's Postulates seems to be no longer a requirement by the scientific community to prove that a pathogen (in it's physical isolation) is the causal agent for a disease.  Today a PCR test of a small fragment of virus genome, when amplified sufficiently, is all that is require to establish "infection" and a thus be a canditate for "transmission". If the pathogen cannot be isolated, then Koch’s postulates cannot be fulfilled. Is it possible symptoms attributed by COVID-19 disease, could actually be due to other factors such as non-ionising radiation sickness for example.  "Conspiracy Theories" will prevail until the Koch's Postulate's shaming has been addressed.