Pfizer add booster assessment to ClinicalTrials.gov

Just over 3 months into the vaccine roll out in the U.S., on March 20, 2021, Pfizer updated their original clinical trial mRNA vaccine protocol to include a new assessment criteria for a third dose (booster).  “In order to describe the boostability of BNT162… against emerging SARS-CoV-2 VOCs, an additional dose of BNT162b2 will be given to Phase 1 participants approximately 6 to 12 months after their second dose…” [1, 2] The mRNA vaccines were only assessed for reducing symptoms to COVID-19, and many vaccinated individuals are getting COVID-19, including severe symptoms – meaning the vaccines are “leaky“.  The COVID-19 vaccines do not stop transmission or infection, and were never assessed for this, they were assessed on symptoms. On April 1st, 2021 Pfizer then added “and potentially a fourth dose of prototype BNT162b2VOC (BNT162b2s01, based upon the South African variant and hereafter referred to as BNT162b2SA).” Are the mRNA synthetic codes in these “vaccines” being altered?  Is that what the “b1”, “b2” “b2SA” etc mean?  This appears to be setting the stage for boosters every 6 months with a “new” synthetic mRNA code.

WHO Emergency Committee continue PHEIC

On January 15, 2021 the WHO Emergency Committee decided to continue the Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) due to the “threat” of virus “variants”.  The PHEIC is a necessary declaration to justify "emergency use" of vaccines. At this point “the impact of vaccines in reducing transmission is yet unknown.”

South Australia goes into Lockdown

State Coordinator, Commissioner Grantley Stevens enacted a Stay at Home Direction to lockdown a million South Australians for a 6 days “circuit breaker” on the back of an alleged new “pizza box” transmission as claimed by Chief Public Health Officer Professor Spurrier. [1, 2, 3] The Direction was revoked on 22nd November, 3 days later, allowing South Australians out of home lockdown.

FOIA proves SARS-CoV-2 virus has not been isolated

The Victorian Government was asked under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to provide “a document that shows there is a test that 100% positively identifies the causal agent, SARS-CoV-2, and not other coronaviruses”.  The government response was “no relevant documents have been located”. A FOIA request in Canada asking for evidence that SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated, returned “no records responsive to your request were identified.”  These null responses, and at least 165 from other global health organisations show that Koch's Postulates seems to be no longer a requirement by the scientific community to prove that a pathogen (in it's physical isolation) is the causal agent for a disease.  Today a PCR test of a small fragment of virus genome, when amplified sufficiently, is all that is require to establish "infection" and a thus be a canditate for "transmission". If the pathogen cannot be isolated, then Koch’s postulates cannot be fulfilled. Is it possible symptoms attributed by COVID-19 disease, could actually be due to other factors such as non-ionising radiation sickness for example.  "Conspiracy Theories" will prevail until the Koch's Postulate's shaming has been addressed.

Symptoms of COVID-19 infection

Coronaviruses typically causes the "common cold" or other mild respiratory viral illnesses, and historically are highly infectious and mutate regularly.  SARS-CoV-2 has features different to normal coronaviruses and symptoms which may appear 2 to 14 days after exposure. The disease caused by SARS-CoV-2 virus is called COVID-19, which can manifest in a wide range of symptoms from nothing through a broad range of flu-like issues.  Four out of 5 had no symptoms, and about 1% of the population are susceptible to escalated symptoms, generally those predisposed with a weakened immune system. [1] As most people have no to mild symptoms (meaning their immune system is healthy), the world adopted a test (PCR) to determine if they were statistically “sick”. something never done before in history, especially using a test that is not "fit for purpose". US doctors were/are advise by the NIH protocol to do nothing until their patients symptoms have escalated to the point they require hospitalisation, something unprecedented in the any disease action.  Independent doctors didn’t heed this advice.  WHO recommendation on home care and treatment guidelines. The WHO interim guidance document for management of COVID-19 was released 28 May 2020 ( stating no early HCQ or corticosteroid..> READ MORE

Fear: any surface a source of infection!

There was a massive cleaning frenzy after it was announced the virus could remain on surfaces for 2-3 days and be a point of transmission.  Though it is actually limited on most surfaces, is easily neutralised with typical household cleaners, and it’s presence doesn’t mean it’s infectious.  At this point it is unknown how much virus is needed to be infectious.

WHO declares the COVID-19 outbreak a Pandemic

On March 11, 2020 the World Health Organisation (WHO) Director-General, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus declared the novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak a pandemic. [2] “We are deeply concerned both by the alarming levels of spread and severity and by the alarming levels of inaction...We have therefore made the assessment that COVID-19 can be characterised as a pandemic. Pandemic is not a word to use lightly or carelessly. It's a word that, if misused, can cause unreasonable fear or unjustified acceptance that the fight is over, leading to unnecessary suffering and death." WHO Director General, Tedros Adhonom Ghebreyesus on March 11, 2020 at Virtual press conference on COVID-19 [3, 4] The following day Tedros stated "this assessment for two main reasons: first, because of the speed and scale of transmission". Though the declaration of a "pandemic is no longer a designation triggering a formal response" stated Tarik Jasarevic a WHO spokesperson, the PHEIC last month put all member states on alert ! The declaration of a PHEIC, not "pandemic" it would appear, gave the WHO Director-General overreaching global powers to member states who signed the International Health Regulations (IHR) (2005).  The documents purpose is for the "control of the international spread of..> READ MORE

Determining the Incubation Period

WHO worked with an international network of statisticians and mathematical modellers to estimate key epidemiological parameters of COVID-19, such as the incubation period (the time between infection and onset of symptoms).  Preliminary estimates of median incubation period are 5-6 days (ranging from 0-14 days). By March 6, 2020, the WHO settled on incubation period of up to 14 days [2].  With the new concept of asymptomatic spread, an incubation period gives cause to isolate a PCR positive test case for the WHO declared maximum duration of 14 days.  Meaning it could be 14 days before the onset of symptoms!  That person may never produce symptoms!  Historically a disease meant "dis-ease", not well, having a symptom.  From 2020 anyone off the street can get diagnosed with COVID-19 disease if they return a positive PCR test, the lab runs the cycles of amplification up to 40 cycles (or 45) , which as Kary Mullis cautioned, you're sure to find "something" its that good!

WHO: China setting the stage for global reponse

The WHO released a report dated 16-24 February 2020, on how China responded to COVID-19 and how the virus spreads. This Joint Mission report includes relevant statements that set the stage for how the world then responded: bats seafood market no prior immunity post infection immunity droplet transmission human-to-human transmission contact tracing symptom – spectrum from asymptomatic to death 80% cases mild to moderate incubation possibly 1-14 days at highest risk are with underlying conditions – over 80 The report found “early cases identified in Wuhan are believed to have acquired infection from a zoonotic source” in the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market. [1] On February 24, 2020 the joint mission taskforce reported that lockdowns worked and the rest of the world should follow China's lead.

Images of the virus SARS-CoV-2

NIAID’s Rocky Mountain Laboratories (RML) in Hamilton, Montana, claimed to have produced images of SARS-CoV-2 using scanning and transmission electron microscopes (EM). Other claim EM images show the SARS-CoV-2 virus, but is it viral-like particles or cellular debris? [1, 2, 3, 4 ] Compare to the SARS and MERS viruses.