Australian journalist provides evidence that the WIV housed live bats

On June 13, 2021 Australian Sky News journalist Sharri Markson reveals more coverups by trusted experts investigating the Chinese Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV). The question whether the virus originated from the WIV lab is looking more and more plausible by the day. Facts as we now know them: The French built and funded the WIV, and once finished they were kicked out. The lab workers had no prior experience in a Level 4 Biosecuirty Lab (BSL-4), the place where highly dangerous virus experimentation was undertaken. The lab did house live bats, a fact previously denied, and deflected blame to a Wuhan wet-market which was known did not have live bats. The lab housed bats as revealed in May 2017 launch video  for the WIV lab, as obtained from Chinese Academy of Science. In December 2020 Daszak stated that the lab does not have live or dead bats, then in June 2021 he does a 180 turn and state’s he didn’t ask them, and wouldn’t be surprised if the lab did have bats. The WIV research team had collected over 15,000 bat samples, to isolate and characterise new viruses.  The database was wiped clean by an alleged hacker in Sept..> READ MORE

WHO launch a team to investigate SARS-CoV-2 origin

Upon the back of new evidence, the US Secretary of State ,Mike Pompeo, demanded the WHO to launch an investigation into the possibility that the virus was a “accidental” lab leak. On January 28, 2021, after 2 weeks of quarantine the WHO probe team begin their investigation in Wuhan, China tasked to learn the origins of SARS-CoV-2, this is a little over one year after the virus was discovered in humans. Part of the investigation team is Peter Daszak from EcoHealth Alliance, whos organisation provides funding to the Wuhan lab for work on bat coronavirus research, a man who is clearly conflicted. Shi Zhengli-Li who receives funding from EcoHealth Alliance and claimed no lab staff were infected, is the deputy director of the Wuhan Institute of Virology.  The Wuhan lab deleted their data. A cluster of COVID-19 case was found at the Huanan wet market, where bats were not sold, according to a paper sited by US officials in February 2020. Lab origin is not ruled out!

Scientific Consensus: Lancet letter used to “debunk” lab-leak theory

On February 19, 2020 a letter was published in The Lancet by 27 expert scientists to debunk “rumours and misinformation” about potential lab leak origins of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.  This consensus was used as “evidence” for suppressing debate on whether the virus could have escaped the Wuhan lab; demonstrating the power of “scientific consensus” coupled with the media influence to rule a narrative. [1] They stated: “we stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin” They claimed no competing interests! Though 2021, it was revealed that 26 of the 27 scientists have links to Wuhan scientists including Professor John Mackenzie from Australia, who also served on WHO Emergency Committee. [2, 3] Emails gained under FOI request shows planning by Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance in who should sign the letter! [4] In June 2021 we learn: Peter Daszak who heads EcoHealth Alliance who funds Wuhan Institute of Virology and is a WHO investigator clearly has competing interests. Daszak thanked Fauci in an email for dismissing the lab-leak theory Peter Palese does a 180 turn in opinion. Jeremy Farrar, of the Wellcome Trust and on the CEPI executive and SAC is very conflicted,..> READ MORE

Poor interest in coronavirus research is a concern

Statnews draws attention to the field of coronavirus research to be "small and modestly funded" and as the past two decades have proven is a “boom-and-bust” research area, as such coronavirus experts are minimal to few. In addition, there are no drugs approved specifically to treat coronavirus infection, and the demand for funding and career focus is driven by the need. A “declared” pandemic would “highlight” that immediate need, the "economics will follow the hype" said Peter Daszak in March 2015 workshop.  The hype is needed to sustain the research funding!

Study concludes engineered viruses may be too risky to pursue

Chinese virologist Shi Zheng-Li in Wuhan, together with US virologist Ralph Baric, published a paper that “synthetically re-derived an infectious…virus”, concluding that building chimeric viruses maybe too risky to pursue. They took a 2002 SARS virus and inserted the protein from a rufous horseshoe bat, creating a new infectious human pathogen.  It was intended to “warn the world” of a potential risk of SARS-CoV re-emergence! The study was funded by NIH via EcoHealth Alliance, and NGO who's president is Peter Daszak.  This study was approved by NIH to continue even though it came under the Gain of Function funding moratorium. In 2020, Daszak thanked Dr Fauci via email, for dismissing theories that SARS-CoV-2 could be man-made. In February 2021, Daszak represented the US on the WHO probe in to the origins of SARS-CoV-2.

ACE2 Receptor identified as bat coronavirus infection site for humans.

In an October 30, 2013 paper in Nature, Shi Zheng-Li and Peter Daszak et al reported a key discovery: that certain bat viruses could potentially infect humans without first jumping to an intermediate animal. By isolating a live SARS-like bat coronavirus (from a rufous horseshoe bat in Yunnan mine 2012) for the first time, bat SL-CoV-WIV1, Shi's team found that it could enter human cells through a protein called the ACE2 receptor. [1]

VRBPAC meeting: 3 Big Pharma’s discuss their Vaccine Platforms

On January 26, 2023 the FDA's advisory committee, VRBPAC, held their 178th meeting to Discuss Future Vaccination Regimens Addressing COVID-19.   Discussions included next generation vaccines such as mucosal, plus Moderna, Pfizer/BioNTech and Novavax got to speak about their Vaccine Platforms, updating the genetic code. With the FDA accepting these vaccine platforms all they need to do in the future is "assess" the "varient" for whatever virus they choose to target with the vaccine! The emergency use of COVID-19 vaccines during the pandemic has allowed, in record time, Big Pharma companies to establish their new technology vaccine platforms into the market, Platforms that can encode for whatever virus variant they choose! What are the chances of 3 independent companies, introducing brand new technology products, all successfully gaining regulatory approval at the same time, in a record timeframe?  Now every emerging and existing disease can have a vaccine solution - just as Gates [1, 2], Fauci [2], Daszak et al wanted. [4, 5]

The term “social distancing” is first coined

On February 12, 2006 the phrase "social distancing" was first coined in a New York times article: If the avian flu goes pandemic while Tamiflu and vaccines are still in short supply, experts say, the only protection most Americans will have is "social distancing," which is the new politically correct way of saying "quarantine." But distancing also encompasses less drastic measures, like wearing face masks, staying out of elevators -- and the [elbow] bump. The "highly contagious" (spreads easily) H5N1 avian flu of 2005-06, went away "without the imposition of totalitarian controls that the U.S. president sought at the time."   The Bush government produced a national strategy pandemic report in November 2005, the proposed "plans were never deployed. At the time, not many people took the thing that seriously. There were tests and a vaccine available, though not widely used. In 2005, 98 people died globally, and another 115 the following year." [1]

Bill Gates: What wasn’t achieved with COVID-19 pandemic

In an interview with Jeremy Hunt on November 7 2021, Bill Gates comments about his post-2015 pandemic preparedness "prophecies" that weren't heeded with Ebola, but COVID-19 pandemic allowed for R&D budgets to focus on things we didn't have. [1, 2] He recounts what wasn't achieved in this COVID-19 pandemic: "we didn't have vaccines that blocked transmission...we need a new way of doing the vaccines"..."we didn't get much by way of therapeutics"..."we didn't get the diagnostics up and running in order to achieve, well at least Australia and New Zealand [both island continents] showed that competent management could keep the death rate down pretty dramatically".  It will take tens of billions in R&D" He also plants the seed to remind us about the threat of bio-terrorism such as smallpox being brought into airports. He continues setting the stage for the next pandemic preparedness:  having the  WHO "global pandemic taskforce", all in preparation for the next pandemic! "Making vaccines cheap [mRNA platform], building big factories, eradicating the flu, getting rid of the common cold, making vaccines jut a little patch you put on your arm, things that will be incredibly beneficial even in years when we don't have pandemics" Remember for every..> READ MORE